Jump to content

User talk:Jamesontai: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 48h) to User talk:Jamesontai/Archive 6.
Pascal.Tesson (talk | contribs)
Line 86: Line 86:
<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist|''Signpost'' spamlist]]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] ([[User talk:Ragesoss|talk]]) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)</small><small><font color="green">[[User:ShepBot|'''§hepBot''']]</font>'''&nbsp;<small>(<font color="red">[[User talk:ShepBot|Disable]]</font>)'''</small> 19:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)</small>
<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist|''Signpost'' spamlist]]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] ([[User talk:Ragesoss|talk]]) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)</small><small><font color="green">[[User:ShepBot|'''§hepBot''']]</font>'''&nbsp;<small>(<font color="red">[[User talk:ShepBot|Disable]]</font>)'''</small> 19:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)</small>
:Yay... for once it's only one issue... [[User:Jamesontai|'''''<font color="#000066">- Jameson L. Tai</font>''''']] <sup>''<font color="#660000">[[User talk:Jamesontai|talk]] ♦ [[User:Jamesontai/Autograph_Book|guestbook]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Jamesontai|contribs]]''</font></sup> 20:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
:Yay... for once it's only one issue... [[User:Jamesontai|'''''<font color="#000066">- Jameson L. Tai</font>''''']] <sup>''<font color="#660000">[[User talk:Jamesontai|talk]] ♦ [[User:Jamesontai/Autograph_Book|guestbook]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Jamesontai|contribs]]''</font></sup> 20:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Itsmejudith ==

Hello. Please forgive the spam but since [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Itsmejudith]] is heading toward a very close decision, I'm contacting all editors who were in the "Neutral" section in the hope that they can take a second look at the RfA and make a more explicit recommendation (either way). Thank you, [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] ([[User talk:Pascal.Tesson|talk]]) 18:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:27, 17 January 2009


Please read before posting here for the first time
  • Please sign your messages with four tildes, like ~~~~. You can also click the button above the edit box.
  • You may want to read the talk page guidelines before leaving a message.
  • All messages posted here will be replied to on this page unless requested otherwise.
  • Please post new messages at the bottom. This is so I can see who just left me a message without going into history.

  • Click here to quickly leave a new message.

I got this from NASCAR Fan24.--->

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 2 10 January 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: December themed Main Page Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yay... for once it's only one issue... - Jameson L. Tai talkguestbookcontribs 20:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Itsmejudith

Hello. Please forgive the spam but since Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Itsmejudith is heading toward a very close decision, I'm contacting all editors who were in the "Neutral" section in the hope that they can take a second look at the RfA and make a more explicit recommendation (either way). Thank you, Pascal.Tesson (talk) 18:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]