User talk:Brendon111: Difference between revisions
Brendon111 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
:::I did not start this conversation elsewhere and this is where it belongs. You show up on the day that the RfC starts and quickly turn into a [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|single purpose account]], editing that RfC solely. In less than a month you seem to know much more about Wiki formatting than most people who have been here for years - though notably you blunder your way into it (e.g. you original signature) as if you want to suggest that you didn't quite know what you were doing. You also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Muhammad_images&diff=487894150&oldid=487892335 talk about Wikipedia policy] ''as if'' you have years of experience with it. So what's going on here?[[User:Griswaldo|Griswaldo]] ([[User talk:Griswaldo|talk]]) 10:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC) |
:::I did not start this conversation elsewhere and this is where it belongs. You show up on the day that the RfC starts and quickly turn into a [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|single purpose account]], editing that RfC solely. In less than a month you seem to know much more about Wiki formatting than most people who have been here for years - though notably you blunder your way into it (e.g. you original signature) as if you want to suggest that you didn't quite know what you were doing. You also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Muhammad_images&diff=487894150&oldid=487892335 talk about Wikipedia policy] ''as if'' you have years of experience with it. So what's going on here?[[User:Griswaldo|Griswaldo]] ([[User talk:Griswaldo|talk]]) 10:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
::::Firstly, I ''don't'' find your comment polite and it severely lacks [[WP:AGF|good faith]]. <p>Secondly, as [[WP:SPA]] claims, {{quote|"many ''single-purpose accounts turn out to be well-intentioned editors with a niche interest''.. for these reasons, experienced editors often scrutinize the editing activities of new editors and single-purpose accounts carefully in a discussion to discern whether they appear to be here to ''build an encyclopedia'' (perhaps needing help and advice), or alternatively edit for promotion, advocacy or other unsuitable agendas."}} I'm here to improve Wikipedia in whatever little way I can. But aren't you supposed to treat newcomers with ''kindness'' and ''patience'' (according to [[WP:NEWCOMER]])??? I don't like your attitude. <p>Thirdly, I don't want any dispute with anyone here. This sort of personal attack reeks of your utmost [[WP:CIVIL|incivility]]. <p>Hence, I ''do not'' want to continue this conversation. <span style="text-shadow:#dd0 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:Brendon111|<font face="Ravie" color="Green"><b>Brendon is</b></font>]] [[User talk:Brendon111|<font color="brown"><b>here</b></font>]]</span> 13:36, 18 April 2012 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Griswaldo leave it. And leave me alone --> |
Revision as of 13:36, 18 April 2012
Thank you for visiting my talk page
Welcome to my talk page! Please do not bring discussions here from other pages. Please use diffs when talking about edits. If you leave me a message on my talk page, I will reply on my talk page, so you may want to watch this page. I will not continue to watch a talk page if the discussion has migrated. I check my watchlist regularly. I don't always add talk pages to my watchlist if I comment on them, unless it's a user talk page or I started an important discussion. I would like you to leave a message by clicking here Thank you.
This is our talk page. This page is where we (You and I) would probably be chatting and be having a friendly conversation. Help me build this page! :) Brendon is here 12:31, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() | Brendon is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.Albeit, he would try to reply to all the queries as soon as possible. |
Welcome to Wikipedia, Brendon111
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Culinary_fruits_front_view.jpg/300px-Culinary_fruits_front_view.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Face-smile.svg/25px-Face-smile.svg.png)
Hello, Brendon111, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- Introduction to Wikipedia | Tutorial
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! AshLin (talk) 12:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References== {{Reflist}}
Your signature is an atrocity
Please change it, surely I am not the only editor annoyed by it. Austen Frazier (talk) 06:53, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, my over-sensitive sassy (or sissy?) friend (Acfrazier, right?). I've now changed it. One can only hope you like the new face of my signature. If you still don't like it, you could always have a check up. Hahaha!! :) Brendon is here 12:31, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the change. It's still a bit eye-catching (which is of course your intent, I'm sure), but definitely less obnoxious. I know not what others may say, but I appreciate the improvement. HuskyHuskie (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- I appreciate your kind feedback. As you might already know, I'm new here. I would like to make new friends here, someone who could explain the rules and regulation of wikipedia without resorting to the use of too much of jargon. Happy editing. :) Brendon is here 08:32, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the change. It's still a bit eye-catching (which is of course your intent, I'm sure), but definitely less obnoxious. I know not what others may say, but I appreciate the improvement. HuskyHuskie (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Your Welcome
Not a big deal, but in case you didn't read the reply on my own talk page, I do want to note that I was welcomed a long time ago by SqueakBox when I was using another account... but of course, it is nice to be welcomed again, so thanks for your welcome.--New questions? 06:26, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Welcome!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg/300px-Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Face-smile.svg/25px-Face-smile.svg.png)
{{helpme}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Best Wishes Ankh.Morpork 16:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Cheers. Its never too late to be welcomed!
Best Wishes Ankh.Morpork 21:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)- You're right. Hahaha!!! Cheers! Brendon is here 21:41, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Strange coincidence
Brendon. How is it that you happened to create your account on the very day that the RfC on the Muhammad images started, and then after a handful of edits on other pages for a week you started editing pretty much nothing else but this RfC, and doing so rather extensively? It's a pretty odd coincidence if you ask me, one that a betting man might not believe is a coincidence at all. Are you really a new user?Griswaldo (talk) 04:36, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it is a coincidence. If it's a strange one or not I don't know. I will appreciate if you don't continue a conversation here which was started elsewhere. I don't want to get personal here. Please help me. Thank you! Brendon is here 07:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- I did not start this conversation elsewhere and this is where it belongs. You show up on the day that the RfC starts and quickly turn into a single purpose account, editing that RfC solely. In less than a month you seem to know much more about Wiki formatting than most people who have been here for years - though notably you blunder your way into it (e.g. you original signature) as if you want to suggest that you didn't quite know what you were doing. You also talk about Wikipedia policy as if you have years of experience with it. So what's going on here?Griswaldo (talk) 10:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Firstly, I don't find your comment polite and it severely lacks good faith.
Secondly, as WP:SPA claims,
I'm here to improve Wikipedia in whatever little way I can. But aren't you supposed to treat newcomers with kindness and patience (according to WP:NEWCOMER)??? I don't like your attitude."many single-purpose accounts turn out to be well-intentioned editors with a niche interest.. for these reasons, experienced editors often scrutinize the editing activities of new editors and single-purpose accounts carefully in a discussion to discern whether they appear to be here to build an encyclopedia (perhaps needing help and advice), or alternatively edit for promotion, advocacy or other unsuitable agendas."
Thirdly, I don't want any dispute with anyone here. This sort of personal attack reeks of your utmost incivility.
Hence, I do not want to continue this conversation. Brendon is here 13:36, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Firstly, I don't find your comment polite and it severely lacks good faith.
- I did not start this conversation elsewhere and this is where it belongs. You show up on the day that the RfC starts and quickly turn into a single purpose account, editing that RfC solely. In less than a month you seem to know much more about Wiki formatting than most people who have been here for years - though notably you blunder your way into it (e.g. you original signature) as if you want to suggest that you didn't quite know what you were doing. You also talk about Wikipedia policy as if you have years of experience with it. So what's going on here?Griswaldo (talk) 10:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)