Jump to content

User talk:Lightdarkness: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MadmanBot (talk | contribs)
Line 60: Line 60:
:That's what was in the article. (This is Peridon, by the way. Lightdarkness hasn't been around since November 2010 and isn't an admin any more so far as I know.) We don't do that thing of quoting the content in the deletion reason now - for reasons that should be fairly obvious (and should have been then as well...). The missing bit is 'er", and well as two Charlie Brown specials.' followed by a link to your website. The editor who created it is also no longer around. There's no point in restoring it, as nowadays articles have to meet new requirements - which that doesn't. Please see [[WP:BIO]] and [[WP:RS]] (reliable independent sources - not own sites for example). I'd advise reading [[WP:COI]] and [[WP:AUTOBIO]] too if you're thinking about a new article. There was an earlier article of the same title about a drummer who went to work in CGI stuff - don't know if that's you or someone else. There's more in that, but nothing that would pass BIO. You can reply here or at my talk page. (It was lucky that you put the whole deletion template in or no-one would have seen this...) [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 17:35, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
:That's what was in the article. (This is Peridon, by the way. Lightdarkness hasn't been around since November 2010 and isn't an admin any more so far as I know.) We don't do that thing of quoting the content in the deletion reason now - for reasons that should be fairly obvious (and should have been then as well...). The missing bit is 'er", and well as two Charlie Brown specials.' followed by a link to your website. The editor who created it is also no longer around. There's no point in restoring it, as nowadays articles have to meet new requirements - which that doesn't. Please see [[WP:BIO]] and [[WP:RS]] (reliable independent sources - not own sites for example). I'd advise reading [[WP:COI]] and [[WP:AUTOBIO]] too if you're thinking about a new article. There was an earlier article of the same title about a drummer who went to work in CGI stuff - don't know if that's you or someone else. There's more in that, but nothing that would pass BIO. You can reply here or at my talk page. (It was lucky that you put the whole deletion template in or no-one would have seen this...) [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 17:35, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
::Lightdarkness is still an admin but on the 'inactive' list. [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 17:39, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
::Lightdarkness is still an admin but on the 'inactive' list. [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 17:39, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Following a [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/suspend sysop rights of inactive admins|community discussion]] in June 2011, consensus was reached to [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural removal for inactive administrators|provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year]] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard]] and the userright will be restored per the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Resysopping|re-sysopping process]] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> [[User:MadmanBot|MadmanBot]] ([[User talk:MadmanBot|talk]]) 20:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:57, 1 November 2012

lightdarkness' messages (+)

Orphaned non-free image File:Disney - Brink.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Disney - Brink.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 12:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xenotalk 14:04, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Interview Regarding Wikipedia Bots

Greetings Lightdarkness-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a graduate student at the University of Oregon, currently collecting data for my dissertation on Wikipedia editors who create and use bots and assisted editing tools, as well as editors involved in the initial and/or ongoing creation of bot policies on Wikipedia. As a member of BAG and the bot community, I would very much like to interview you for the project at a time and in a method that is most convenient for you (Gchat, another IM client, Skype, email, telephone, etc.). I am completely flexible and can work with your schedule. The interview will take approximately 30-45 minutes.

My dissertation project has been approved both by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Oregon, and by the Research Committee at the Wikimedia Foundation. You can find more information on the project on my meta page.

Please let me know if you have any questions, and I look forward to hearing from you to set up a time to chat. Thank you very much.

Randall Livingstone, School of Journalism & Communication, University of Oregon

UOJComm (talk) 00:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:I Take Thee Quagmire.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:I Take Thee Quagmire.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM 01:59, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my page deleted?

Hi,

My name is Tony Morales www.tonymorales.com. I know this is several years later but I just read the reason for the deletion of my page on Wikipedia.

"02:22, 21 December 2006 Lightdarkness (talk | contribs) deleted page Tony Morales (content was: '{{db-bio}} Film & television composer, who did uncredited composing on several episode of season six of the populat TV series, "Buffy the Vampire Slay...')"

I'm pretty sure that this was a mistake as my bio on my web site does not mention "Buffy the Vampire Slay...'"

What do I have to do to get the page back?

Thanks,

Tony

That's what was in the article. (This is Peridon, by the way. Lightdarkness hasn't been around since November 2010 and isn't an admin any more so far as I know.) We don't do that thing of quoting the content in the deletion reason now - for reasons that should be fairly obvious (and should have been then as well...). The missing bit is 'er", and well as two Charlie Brown specials.' followed by a link to your website. The editor who created it is also no longer around. There's no point in restoring it, as nowadays articles have to meet new requirements - which that doesn't. Please see WP:BIO and WP:RS (reliable independent sources - not own sites for example). I'd advise reading WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIO too if you're thinking about a new article. There was an earlier article of the same title about a drummer who went to work in CGI stuff - don't know if that's you or someone else. There's more in that, but nothing that would pass BIO. You can reply here or at my talk page. (It was lucky that you put the whole deletion template in or no-one would have seen this...) Peridon (talk) 17:35, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lightdarkness is still an admin but on the 'inactive' list. Peridon (talk) 17:39, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 20:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]