Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truth About Love Tour: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:22, 8 November 2012

Truth About Love Tour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Without even referring to WP:CRYSTAL which it violates terribly. The only source to the tour is first party information, except for a mention in the first reference. No other notability presented, third-party or otherwise. Presents as factual Wikipedia information which is only a promoter's hope based on procuring venues and dates, and not disappointing ticket holders. :- ) Don 04:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The sources seem notable and independent of the sources. The article itself could use improvement, but still should be kept. Vacation9 (talk) 05:51, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Oh, you still think it contains "Only first party information"? Please take an actual LOOK at the article. I've made it my duty to not use first party information. The article is an acceptable stub. Not much about it is revealed yet, as it hasn't begun yet. Statυs (talk) 12:53, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, the entire Australian leg has sold out. So it's certainly not a "hope". These are all confirmed dates that are on sale. Statυs (talk) 12:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Tours are not inherently notable, something has to make them so. A tour that hasn't even happened cannot be notable. If it turns out after the event to be notable, recreate. Until then, this is advertising and hype. Emeraude (talk) 17:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :{{la|Truth About Love Tour}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truth About Love Tour|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 7#{{anchorencode:Truth About Love Tour}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Truth_About_Love_Tour Stats]</span>)
 :({{Find sources|Truth About Love Tour}})
-* '''Delete''' - As Nominator.  Without even referring to [[WP:CRYSTAL]] which it violates terribly.  The only source to the tour is first party information, except for a mention in the first reference.  No other notability presented, third-party or otherwise. Presents as factual Wikipedia information which is only a promoter's hope based on procuring venues and dates, and not disappointing ticket holders. <b>[[User:Dcshank|<span style="color:#3cc8c8">:- )</span>]] [[User talk:Dcshank|<span style="color:#3cc8c8">Don</span>]]</b> 04:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
+Without even referring to [[WP:CRYSTAL]] which it violates terribly.  The only source to the tour is first party information, except for a mention in the first reference.  No other notability presented, third-party or otherwise. Presents as factual Wikipedia information which is only a promoter's hope based on procuring venues and dates, and not disappointing ticket holders. <b>[[User:Dcshank|<span style="color:#3cc8c8">:- )</span>]] [[User talk:Dcshank|<span style="color:#3cc8c8">Don</span>]]</b> 04:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * '''Weak keep''' The sources seem notable and independent of the sources. The article itself could use improvement, but still should be kept. [[User:Vacation9|Vacation9]] ([[User talk:Vacation9|talk]]) 05:51, 7 November 2012 (UTC)