User talk:Razr Nation: Difference between revisions
Razr Nation (talk | contribs) |
Razr Nation (talk | contribs) archiving |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Thanks for giving me the [[User_talk:Godot13#Steeplechase_Award|Steeplestarter]]. I just wanted to follow up on if I would be receiving the two main awards for the Steeplechase 2013. Thanks--[[User:Godot13|Godot13]] ([[User talk:Godot13|talk]]) 17:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks for giving me the [[User_talk:Godot13#Steeplechase_Award|Steeplestarter]]. I just wanted to follow up on if I would be receiving the two main awards for the Steeplechase 2013. Thanks--[[User:Godot13|Godot13]] ([[User talk:Godot13|talk]]) 17:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
:Oh, I forgot about those. Yes, I will try to give them down to you this coming week. Cheers. ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''Hahc'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''21'''</font>]] 22:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC) |
:Oh, I forgot about those. Yes, I will try to give them down to you this coming week. Cheers. ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''Hahc'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''21'''</font>]] 22:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Request help with charts == |
|||
Hey, Hahc21. Since I know you to be a chart master I was wondering if you could find the time to take a look at the charts in the ''[[Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band]]'' article. Cheers! [[User:GabeMc|<font color="green">GabeMc</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:GabeMc|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/GabeMc|contribs]])</sup> 21:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
:: Ping. [[User:GabeMc|<font color="green">GabeMc</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:GabeMc|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/GabeMc|contribs]])</sup> 21:10, 26 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:: Ping. [[User:GabeMc|<font color="green">GabeMc</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:GabeMc|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/GabeMc|contribs]])</sup> 17:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:::Thanks for pinging, [[User:GabeMc|Gabe]]. I did take a look on Sunday night but I've been extremely busy in RL and have not had time to edit or do almost anything wiki-wise. Since these chart positions are from almost 50 years ago, I think that most of them will be documented on books. However, the European ones should be available at Hung Medien, but I'm not sure. I'll take another look thos week if RL permits. ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''Hahc'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''21'''</font>]] 18:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Hubspot]] == |
== [[Hubspot]] == |
||
Hi Hahc21. As my go-to for GA issues, I'm sorry if I am bombarding you. I was wondering if you had time sometime over the next few weeks to take a look at [[Hubspot]]. It was declined due to concerns over COI/promo issues and I was told I should let others take over article improvement due to COI issues. In my experience, I am the only experienced editor that takes an interest in marketing topics and it is unlikely anyone else will make quality contributions to it. Additionally, I actually disclosed a <i>former</i> COI from a year ago or so, not a current one. I routinely go back to some of the poor COI edits I made in my early Wikipedia career to bring them more in-line with Wikipedia standards. Anyways, I would like to bring it up to GA still, but no specific content issues were described for me to address... [[User:CorporateM|CorporateM]] ([[User_talk:CorporateM|Talk]]) 23:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC) |
Hi Hahc21. As my go-to for GA issues, I'm sorry if I am bombarding you. I was wondering if you had time sometime over the next few weeks to take a look at [[Hubspot]]. It was declined due to concerns over COI/promo issues and I was told I should let others take over article improvement due to COI issues. In my experience, I am the only experienced editor that takes an interest in marketing topics and it is unlikely anyone else will make quality contributions to it. Additionally, I actually disclosed a <i>former</i> COI from a year ago or so, not a current one. I routinely go back to some of the poor COI edits I made in my early Wikipedia career to bring them more in-line with Wikipedia standards. Anyways, I would like to bring it up to GA still, but no specific content issues were described for me to address... [[User:CorporateM|CorporateM]] ([[User_talk:CorporateM|Talk]]) 23:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Hola :-) == |
|||
Hola Hahc21, vengo a pedirte ayuda, como eres el único que habla español xD. Se trata del usuario [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tprg Tprg], ya le he dejado varios mensajes e incluso le dejaron una advertencia y el usuario parece no entender, se la pasa creando posibles artículos de telenovelas que ni han sido confirmadas, lo único que se sabe de cada artículo que el crea son los nombres confirmados + no hay certeza de que estás telenovelas sean transmitidas o no, pueden o no ser canceladas ¿Quién sabe?; ya ha creado estos artículos: [[No Abras la Puerta]], [[La Otra (2015 telenovela)]], [[Luisana Mia (2014 telenovela)]], [[Buscando a María ]], [[ Caleta El Sol]], [[Chipe Libre]], [[Mi Querido Dilema]]. Hace días hizo una recreación de artículos borrados como [[Mi Corazón es Tuyo]] y [[Hasta el Fin del Mundo]], que otro bibliotecario le borró, esto es algo ya cansante, no se puede estar abriendo una consulta de borrado para cada artículo que este usuario crea. Por eso pido que se tome esto en cuenta, lo único que hace es ignorar los mensajes que se les deja, y yo no pienso seguir dejandoles mensajes. Saludos y gracias :).--[[User:GeorgeMilan|<font color="#0082B8">GeorgeMilan</font>]] [[User Talk:GeorgeMilan|<font color="#FF3333"><small> <sup>TALK2ME</sup></small></font>]] 03:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Triple Crown == |
|||
Hey Hahc, what's the process for receiving a triple crown award? I think I am eligible with [[Jim Thome]] (FA), any of several GAs, and any of several DYKs. Thanks. '''[[User:Go Phightins!|<font color="blue">Go</font>]] [[User talk:Go Phightins!|<font color="#E90004">''Phightins''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Go Phightins!|<font color="#008504">!</font>]]''' 01:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:Hey! Follow the instructions here: [[WP:TRIPLE/NOM]], and I'll be giving you the Crown soon. Remember to check for which Crown you apply (it appears on the main TC page). ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''Hahc'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''21'''</font>]] 03:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
==GA review== |
==GA review== |
||
Hello Hahc21, I noticed that you are listed at the GA Help Desk as a GA mentor who is interested in video game articles and referencing issues. I'm conducting my first GA review, which is of the article [[PETA satirical browser games]], and if you have some time, I was wondering if you could take a quick look at my review at [[Talk:PETA satirical browser games/GA1]]. It's a small article and a brief review, but I'm looking for a second opinion on whether a couple of the sources are reliable, and I'd appreciate any feedback of the review generally as well. Thanks! –[[User:Prototime|Prototime]] ([[User_talk:Prototime|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Prototime|contribs]]) 03:18, 1 June 2014 (UTC) |
Hello Hahc21, I noticed that you are listed at the GA Help Desk as a GA mentor who is interested in video game articles and referencing issues. I'm conducting my first GA review, which is of the article [[PETA satirical browser games]], and if you have some time, I was wondering if you could take a quick look at my review at [[Talk:PETA satirical browser games/GA1]]. It's a small article and a brief review, but I'm looking for a second opinion on whether a couple of the sources are reliable, and I'd appreciate any feedback of the review generally as well. Thanks! –[[User:Prototime|Prototime]] ([[User_talk:Prototime|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Prototime|contribs]]) 03:18, 1 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Please comment on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Character notability (for full articles)#rfc_B82F61D|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Character notability (for full articles)]] == |
|||
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the [[Wikipedia:Request for comment|request for comment]] on '''[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Character notability (for full articles)#rfc_B82F61D|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Character notability (for full articles)]]'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding|suggestions for responding]]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:Feedback request service]]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 10106 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 00:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
==POTD notification== |
|||
[[File:Enterprise free flight.jpg|thumb|100px|right|[[Wikipedia:Picture of the day/June 2014#June 20 - Fri|POTD]]]] |
|||
Hi Hahc, |
|||
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture [[:File:Enterprise free flight.jpg]] is due to make an appearance as [[Wikipedia:Picture of the day|Picture of the Day]] on June 20, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at [[Template:POTD/2014-06-20]]. Thank you for all of your contributions! — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 01:38, 3 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
{{-}} |
|||
== Thank you for your support == |
|||
Hahc21, I would like to take this moment and thank you for the trust you had placed in me and for your support in my RfA that happened a while ago. Although it didn't turn out as I had planned, I certainly appreciated all the comments and suggestions given by you and other people. I will learn from all of them and will hopefully run again someday when I'm fully ready. Thank you. [[User:TheGeneralUser|TheGeneralUser]] ([[User talk:TheGeneralUser|talk]]) 13:01, 3 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:You are very very welcome :) ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''Hahc'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''21'''</font>]] 21:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== GitLab deletion == |
|||
Hi Hahc21, |
|||
I would like to undo the deletion of the GitLab page in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GitLab |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review says that this can be done when "if significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page; |
|||
" |
|||
I hope that an article on the homepage of [[The Next Web]] qualifies as such: http://thenextweb.com/insider/2014/06/04/github-rival-gitlab-building-business-just-0-1-paying-customers/ |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review states that before listing a review request, I should discuss the matter with the closing administrator |
|||
I saw that on the user talk page of Mark Arsten that he is unavailable and you can maybe help. |
|||
Please let me know what I should do, I've never done this before, I tried to read all the documentation, I hope this action is OK. |
|||
Best regards, |
|||
Sytse Sijbrandij |
|||
CEO GitLab B.V. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sytses|Sytses]] ([[User talk:Sytses|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sytses|contribs]]) 13:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Please comment on [[Wikipedia:VisualEditor/VisualEditor default state 2014 part 1#rfc_E59843E|Wikipedia:VisualEditor/VisualEditor default state 2014 part 1]] == |
|||
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the [[Wikipedia:Request for comment|request for comment]] on '''[[Wikipedia:VisualEditor/VisualEditor default state 2014 part 1#rfc_E59843E|Wikipedia:VisualEditor/VisualEditor default state 2014 part 1]]'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding|suggestions for responding]]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:Feedback request service]]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 10283 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 00:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== ''The Signpost'': 04 June 2014 == |
|||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-04}} |
|||
</div><!--Volume 10, Issue 21--> |
|||
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> |
|||
* '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]] |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] |
|||
* [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 04:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
</div></div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=611617839 --> |
|||
== Lead Section [[Henrique Capriles Radonski]] == |
== Lead Section [[Henrique Capriles Radonski]] == |
||
Line 90: | Line 24: | ||
:@[[User:RJFF|RJFF]]: You know, when I work on an article, I have tho methods: from top to bottom, or from bottom to top. When you reverted me the first time, I was mid-way on my work with that article. I crafted the lead to resemble what the article length would be when I was done. However, you unilaterally came and interrupted my work. I am aware of all these guidelines (been here for 6 years now), but as I said, it was a ''work in progress''. You didn't care to notice that there was a template a bit below saying that a Wikipedian was working on the article, do you? Anyways, I have lost interest in the article and won't revert you further. Every time I have a desire to improve articles about politics, someone comes and washes my efforts so I won't care anymore. Cheers. ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''Hahc'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''21'''</font>]] 17:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC) |
:@[[User:RJFF|RJFF]]: You know, when I work on an article, I have tho methods: from top to bottom, or from bottom to top. When you reverted me the first time, I was mid-way on my work with that article. I crafted the lead to resemble what the article length would be when I was done. However, you unilaterally came and interrupted my work. I am aware of all these guidelines (been here for 6 years now), but as I said, it was a ''work in progress''. You didn't care to notice that there was a template a bit below saying that a Wikipedian was working on the article, do you? Anyways, I have lost interest in the article and won't revert you further. Every time I have a desire to improve articles about politics, someone comes and washes my efforts so I won't care anymore. Cheers. ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''Hahc'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''21'''</font>]] 17:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
::I didn't mean to annoy or disgruntle you and I am sorry if I did so. As an experienced user, you could have given a short explanation in the edit summary to avoid misunderstanding. I tried to make my reverts understandable, but you re-reverted without making your position clear. Again: I am sorry for this misunderstanding. But I think that even if the article were considerably longer, the intro you proposed would still be too long. It is in no way a ''"concise overview"'' of the subject. If someone who has no idea of who Capriles is wants to get some basic information, they do not need to know all these details. Someone who wants to get detailed information can read the respective section of the article's body. Again: I didn't mean to offend you or to put you off. I would be happy if you could overcome your understandable indignation and continue your work on the article. Kind regards, --[[User:RJFF|RJFF]] ([[User talk:RJFF|talk]]) 13:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC) |
::I didn't mean to annoy or disgruntle you and I am sorry if I did so. As an experienced user, you could have given a short explanation in the edit summary to avoid misunderstanding. I tried to make my reverts understandable, but you re-reverted without making your position clear. Again: I am sorry for this misunderstanding. But I think that even if the article were considerably longer, the intro you proposed would still be too long. It is in no way a ''"concise overview"'' of the subject. If someone who has no idea of who Capriles is wants to get some basic information, they do not need to know all these details. Someone who wants to get detailed information can read the respective section of the article's body. Again: I didn't mean to offend you or to put you off. I would be happy if you could overcome your understandable indignation and continue your work on the article. Kind regards, --[[User:RJFF|RJFF]] ([[User talk:RJFF|talk]]) 13:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
== Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Jaihind (2nd nomination) review. == |
== Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Jaihind (2nd nomination) review. == |
||
Line 96: | Line 31: | ||
Please review Naveen Jaihind page. I would like to review Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Jaihind (2nd nomination). There are two biased opinions about him as he is enough Notable.[[User:Gokulchandola|GKCH]] ([[User talk:Gokulchandola|talk]]) 13:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC) |
Please review Naveen Jaihind page. I would like to review Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Jaihind (2nd nomination). There are two biased opinions about him as he is enough Notable.[[User:Gokulchandola|GKCH]] ([[User talk:Gokulchandola|talk]]) 13:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
:Hey. Apologies but I'm not willing to review my close as of now. Feel free to take it to [[WP:DRV]] where the community can review it and reach a proper conclusion. Happy editing! ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''Hahc'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''21'''</font>]] 17:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC) |
:Hey. Apologies but I'm not willing to review my close as of now. Feel free to take it to [[WP:DRV]] where the community can review it and reach a proper conclusion. Happy editing! ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''Hahc'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''21'''</font>]] 17:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Counter Vandalism Unit Training == |
|||
Hi my names [[User:Schoolskater|Schoolskater]] ([[User talk:Schoolskater|talk]]). I saw that you have an open slot available for another student in you course. I am interested in joining the Counter Vandalism Unit and wanted to know whether you would enroll me into your training program. Thanks, [[User:Schoolskater|Schoolskater]] ([[User talk:Schoolskater|talk]]) 15:55, 8 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== This week's [[Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement|article for improvement]] (week 24, 2014) == |
|||
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" |
|||
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#E2E7FF; border:1px solid blue; text-align:center; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.4em; padding-bottom: 0.4em; padding-right: 0.4em; font-weight:normal">{{TAFI/Picture box|week=2014/24}} '''Hello, Hahc21.''' |
|||
The following is WikiProject [[Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement|Today's articles for improvement]]'s weekly selection: |
|||
<span style="font-size:140%;">'''{{Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement/2014/24/1}}'''</span> |
|||
---- |
|||
Previous selections: {{Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement/2014/23/1}}{{*}} {{Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement/2014/22/1}} |
|||
---- |
|||
Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... {{Plainlist| |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement/Nominated_articles#Articles|'''Nominate''' an article]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement/Nominated_articles#Instructions|'''Review''' nominations]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia talk:Today's articles for improvement#Vote|'''Have your say''' in future selections]]}} |
|||
---- |
|||
<small>Posted by: [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) on behalf of {{User0|EuroCarGT}} 00:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC) • {{edit|Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement/Members/Notifications|Opt-out instructions}}</small></div> |
|||
|}<!-- Substituted from Template:TAFI weekly selections notice --> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:EuroCarGT@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Today%27s_articles_for_improvement/Members/Notifications&oldid=611475344 --> |
|||
==Deletion review for [[Naveen Jaihind]]== |
|||
An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Naveen Jaihind|deletion review]] of [[Naveen Jaihind]]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> [[User:Gokulchandola|GKCH]] ([[User talk:Gokulchandola|talk]]) 05:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks for letting me know. ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''Hahc'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''21'''</font>]] 17:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Murder of Jessica Currin -- Could I have a copy of the deleted article? == |
== Murder of Jessica Currin -- Could I have a copy of the deleted article? == |
Revision as of 17:52, 10 June 2014
Contributions Schedule · Academy · To do · RFA · Templates · Files · Barnstars & Awards · Featured content · Good articles · GA reviews · DYK · DYK reviews · Articles |
|
Steeplechase 2013
Hi Hahc- Thanks for giving me the Steeplestarter. I just wanted to follow up on if I would be receiving the two main awards for the Steeplechase 2013. Thanks--Godot13 (talk) 17:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, I forgot about those. Yes, I will try to give them down to you this coming week. Cheers. → Call me Hahc21 22:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Hahc21. As my go-to for GA issues, I'm sorry if I am bombarding you. I was wondering if you had time sometime over the next few weeks to take a look at Hubspot. It was declined due to concerns over COI/promo issues and I was told I should let others take over article improvement due to COI issues. In my experience, I am the only experienced editor that takes an interest in marketing topics and it is unlikely anyone else will make quality contributions to it. Additionally, I actually disclosed a former COI from a year ago or so, not a current one. I routinely go back to some of the poor COI edits I made in my early Wikipedia career to bring them more in-line with Wikipedia standards. Anyways, I would like to bring it up to GA still, but no specific content issues were described for me to address... CorporateM (Talk) 23:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
GA review
Hello Hahc21, I noticed that you are listed at the GA Help Desk as a GA mentor who is interested in video game articles and referencing issues. I'm conducting my first GA review, which is of the article PETA satirical browser games, and if you have some time, I was wondering if you could take a quick look at my review at Talk:PETA satirical browser games/GA1. It's a small article and a brief review, but I'm looking for a second opinion on whether a couple of the sources are reliable, and I'd appreciate any feedback of the review generally as well. Thanks! –Prototime (talk · contribs) 03:18, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Lead Section Henrique Capriles Radonski
Hello Hahc21,
per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section (MOS:LEAD), the lead section should serve "as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important aspects", provide a "concise overview". It should have an appropriate length, depending on the length of the total article. In your version, the lead section occupies about a third of the article. It is absolutely disproportionate. It contains very detailed information that does not belong to the "most important aspects" of who Capriles is. If you cannot accept this view and disagree, I would like to ask you to please take this issue to the article's talk page instead of reverting to your version again and again.
Kind regards, --RJFF (talk) 11:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
By the way, as a rule of thumb (WP:LEADLENGTH) an article with less than 15,000 characters of prose should have a lead section of only one or two paragraphs. This article has about 10,000 characters. --RJFF (talk) 11:04, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- @RJFF: You know, when I work on an article, I have tho methods: from top to bottom, or from bottom to top. When you reverted me the first time, I was mid-way on my work with that article. I crafted the lead to resemble what the article length would be when I was done. However, you unilaterally came and interrupted my work. I am aware of all these guidelines (been here for 6 years now), but as I said, it was a work in progress. You didn't care to notice that there was a template a bit below saying that a Wikipedian was working on the article, do you? Anyways, I have lost interest in the article and won't revert you further. Every time I have a desire to improve articles about politics, someone comes and washes my efforts so I won't care anymore. Cheers. → Call me Hahc21 17:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to annoy or disgruntle you and I am sorry if I did so. As an experienced user, you could have given a short explanation in the edit summary to avoid misunderstanding. I tried to make my reverts understandable, but you re-reverted without making your position clear. Again: I am sorry for this misunderstanding. But I think that even if the article were considerably longer, the intro you proposed would still be too long. It is in no way a "concise overview" of the subject. If someone who has no idea of who Capriles is wants to get some basic information, they do not need to know all these details. Someone who wants to get detailed information can read the respective section of the article's body. Again: I didn't mean to offend you or to put you off. I would be happy if you could overcome your understandable indignation and continue your work on the article. Kind regards, --RJFF (talk) 13:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- It's okay. I might work on it later, I'm short of time right now :) → Call me Hahc21 17:52, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to annoy or disgruntle you and I am sorry if I did so. As an experienced user, you could have given a short explanation in the edit summary to avoid misunderstanding. I tried to make my reverts understandable, but you re-reverted without making your position clear. Again: I am sorry for this misunderstanding. But I think that even if the article were considerably longer, the intro you proposed would still be too long. It is in no way a "concise overview" of the subject. If someone who has no idea of who Capriles is wants to get some basic information, they do not need to know all these details. Someone who wants to get detailed information can read the respective section of the article's body. Again: I didn't mean to offend you or to put you off. I would be happy if you could overcome your understandable indignation and continue your work on the article. Kind regards, --RJFF (talk) 13:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Jaihind (2nd nomination) review.
Hi, Please review Naveen Jaihind page. I would like to review Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Jaihind (2nd nomination). There are two biased opinions about him as he is enough Notable.GKCH (talk) 13:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hey. Apologies but I'm not willing to review my close as of now. Feel free to take it to WP:DRV where the community can review it and reach a proper conclusion. Happy editing! → Call me Hahc21 17:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Murder of Jessica Currin -- Could I have a copy of the deleted article?
I was the creator of article "Murder of Jessica Currin" which you nominated for deletion and deleted.
Could you provide me with a copy of that article?
Thanks.
Contact Basemetal here 17:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
BTW, isn't it customary that the creator of an article be notified if that article is nominated for deletion so that they can take part in the discussion and vote?
- @Basemetal I can provide you with a copy, yes, as long as you are aware that you cannot recreate the article unless it has been significantly improved notability-wise. Else it will end up at AfD again. However, I didn't nominate it for deletion. It was Lugnuts. I just happen to be the closing administrator. → Call me Hahc21 17:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)