User talk:Leo1pard: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
== A conversation to get out of certain disputes that we found ourselves in == |
== A conversation to get out of certain disputes that we found ourselves in == |
||
السلام عليكم، |
السلام عليكم، |
||
Firstly {{u|Tmason101}}, I agree with you that the Qur'an does not strictly say that the Earth is flat, but a problem is not every person who identifies himself as a Muslim will believe everything that the Qur'an says, then publishes books or pieces of information about his POV, which then could be treated as [[WP:Reliable sources]] in Wikipedia, but this problem is not unique to Muslims. For instance, you both probably know that any kind of violence is forbidden in [[Buddhism]], but obviously, the [[Samurai]] warriors of Japan, or [[Shaolin Kung Fu|Shaolin martial artists]] of China would not see it that way, or wouldn't like to see it that way, and since [[WP:RS]] have been published about them, Wikipedia would value them no less than what original Buddhist texts say. As for Muslims, if Muslims had strictly obeyed the Qur'an, then sects or movements like [[Wahhabism]] or [[Twelvers|Twelver]] [[Shia Islam|Shi'ism]] wouldn't exist in the first place, would they? |
Firstly {{u|Tmason101}}, I agree with you that the Qur'an does not strictly say that the Earth is flat, but a problem is not every person who identifies himself as a Muslim will believe everything that the Qur'an says, then publishes books or pieces of information about his POV, which then could be treated as [[WP:Reliable sources]] in Wikipedia, but this problem is not unique to Muslims. For instance, you both probably know that any kind of violence is forbidden in [[Buddhism]], but obviously, the [[Samurai]] warriors of Japan, or [[Shaolin Kung Fu|Shaolin martial artists]] of China would not see it that way, or wouldn't like to see it that way, and since [[WP:RS]] have been published about them, Wikipedia would value them no less than what original Buddhist texts say. As for Muslims, if Muslims had strictly obeyed the Qur'an, then sects or movements like [[Wahhabism]] or [[Twelvers|Twelver]] [[Shia Islam|Shi'ism]] wouldn't exist in the first place, would they? |
||
And {{u|VenusFeuerFalle}}, you're a [[Gnosticism|gnostic]]-[[Panentheism|panantheist]], [[Liberalism and progressivism within Islam|liberal]], [[Sufism|Sufi]]-[[Sunni Islam|Sunni]] [[Mysticism|mystic]], right? [[User:Leo1pard|Leo1pard]] ([[User talk:Leo1pard#top|talk]]) 10:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC) edited 10:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:01, 23 June 2020
Old talk
|
Thank you!
The Original Barnstar | ||
Thank you! For all of your contributions regarding mountains in the Arabian peninsula. I really appreciate your contributions. SharabSalam (talk) 12:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC) |
Mosque images
Hello. Why are you removing the images in all those mosque articles? Gogolwold (talk) 14:22, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Gogolwold Because these are public buildings that were built less than 50 years ago, see this for more details. Leo1pard (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2020 (UTC); edited 17:39, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- So at the risk of what about, why are there photos in the Burj Khalifa article? Or Louvre Abu Dhabi. Or Sheikh Zayed Mosque?Gogolwold (talk) 18:46, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Gogolwold, read the licence in File:Burj_Khalifa.jpg. The photos are in English Wikipedia and not allowed to be in commons and there is a permission from the author.--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 18:53, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- So at the risk of what about, why are there photos in the Burj Khalifa article? Or Louvre Abu Dhabi. Or Sheikh Zayed Mosque?Gogolwold (talk) 18:46, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Etosha National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White pelican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:55, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
More versus articles for you to consider
I see you contributed to Tiger versus lion and have also created Draft:Bear versus bull. I have some more suggestions. Have you considered:
- Aligator versus crocodile
- Coke versus Pepsi
- Tiger shark versus great white shark
- New Hampshire versus Vermont
- Wolverine versus Tasmanian devil
- Common law versus civil law
- Coronavirus versus flu
- Bear versus shark
- 100 duck-sized horses versus 1 horse-sized duck
- The Wikimedia Foundation versus the Arbitration Committee
- Leopard versus User:Leo1pard
I hope this helps. Natureium (talk) 23:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
EEng 00:03, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
"Black Demon Shark" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Black Demon Shark. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 3#Black Demon Shark until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 23:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:History of lions in Mesopotamia
Hello, Leo1pard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of lions in Mesopotamia".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
A conversation to get out of certain disputes that we found ourselves in
السلام عليكم،
Firstly Tmason101, I agree with you that the Qur'an does not strictly say that the Earth is flat, but a problem is not every person who identifies himself as a Muslim will believe everything that the Qur'an says, then publishes books or pieces of information about his POV, which then could be treated as WP:Reliable sources in Wikipedia, but this problem is not unique to Muslims. For instance, you both probably know that any kind of violence is forbidden in Buddhism, but obviously, the Samurai warriors of Japan, or Shaolin martial artists of China would not see it that way, or wouldn't like to see it that way, and since WP:RS have been published about them, Wikipedia would value them no less than what original Buddhist texts say. As for Muslims, if Muslims had strictly obeyed the Qur'an, then sects or movements like Wahhabism or Twelver Shi'ism wouldn't exist in the first place, would they?
And VenusFeuerFalle, you're a gnostic-panantheist, liberal, Sufi-Sunni mystic, right? Leo1pard (talk) 10:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC) edited 10:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)