User talk:Apollo1203: Difference between revisions
Apollo1203 (talk | contribs) →Pending changes reviewer granted: adding header |
Apollo1203 (talk | contribs) →SMVS: response |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== SMVS == |
== SMVS == |
||
[[User:Sahaj01|Sahaj01]] ([[User talk:Sahaj01|talk]]) 18:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)n the page of Swaminarayan Sampraday, you should add the information of SMVS, which is one of the upgrowing branch of Swaminarayan Sect. As, i made Edit someone restricted for some reason. But, i had that information from the SMVS wiki page.Though, you want some change then I can edit it Newly. what's your opinion. I am waiting for your answer...Sahaj01 (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[[User:Sahaj01|Sahaj01]] ([[User talk:Sahaj01|talk]]) 18:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC) |
[[User:Sahaj01|Sahaj01]] ([[User talk:Sahaj01|talk]]) 18:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)n the page of Swaminarayan Sampraday, you should add the information of SMVS, which is one of the upgrowing branch of Swaminarayan Sect. As, i made Edit someone restricted for some reason. But, i had that information from the SMVS wiki page.Though, you want some change then I can edit it Newly. what's your opinion. I am waiting for your answer...Sahaj01 (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[[User:Sahaj01|Sahaj01]] ([[User talk:Sahaj01|talk]]) 18:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC) |
||
:{{u|Sahaj01}}, thank you for your message. According to Wikipedia policy content should have reliable sources to corroborate the addition of material [[WP:RS]]. Based on the lack of academic scholarship on SMVS, I personally do not see the validity in adding it to the article. I also noticed that the [[SMVS]] article lacks reliable academic sources. [[User:Apollo1203|Apollo1203]] ([[User talk:Apollo1203#top|talk]]) 02:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:44, 28 October 2020
| This is Apollo1203's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1 |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thank you for spearheading the effort to improve the Vachanamrut article. Moksha88 (talk) 22:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC) |
Major branches edit summary
Hi Apollo1203. I've taken the liberty to split your explanations at Talk:Swaminarayan Sampradaya#Major branches edit summary into six sub-threads, to keep a workable overview; I hope you don't mind. I first moved Kevpopz's replies, and mine, to subthreads, but that didn't work; kept scrolling back and forth. Regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for doing that. It will be easier to address certain points in the sub-threads. Apollo1203 (talk) 17:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
~Swarm~ {sting} 17:19, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
SMVS
Sahaj01 (talk) 18:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)n the page of Swaminarayan Sampraday, you should add the information of SMVS, which is one of the upgrowing branch of Swaminarayan Sect. As, i made Edit someone restricted for some reason. But, i had that information from the SMVS wiki page.Though, you want some change then I can edit it Newly. what's your opinion. I am waiting for your answer...Sahaj01 (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Sahaj01 (talk) 18:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sahaj01, thank you for your message. According to Wikipedia policy content should have reliable sources to corroborate the addition of material WP:RS. Based on the lack of academic scholarship on SMVS, I personally do not see the validity in adding it to the article. I also noticed that the SMVS article lacks reliable academic sources. Apollo1203 (talk) 02:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)