User talk:Neutrality

Picture of the day

Acraea terpsicore

Photograph credit: Charles J. Sharp

• Archive
• More featured pictures

NYT/WSJ Breach of Science Dogma

Hi Neutrality,

I respect your interventions and fair-mindedness on these topics. However, the clear double standard being shown between the WSJ and NYT ledes strikes every first-time reader as obscene. Upon reflection, I hope you can see that matters cannot stand as they have been. Thank you. Nesher (talk) 15:44, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For significant expansions to 2021 evacuation of Afghanistan, when numerous other editors were focusing most of their attention on arguing about the correct name. Buckshot06 (talk) 05:49, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Missouri Democratic and Republican 2008 primary templates

Hello, Neutrality, I discovered Missouri Democratic primary, 2008 and Missouri Republican primary, 2008, which you created back in 2010. I've been mulling over nominating it for deletion, but I want your take on them before anything. Do you think they should be kept aside from the fact you created it? I'm not sure why a separate one was created and placed on each of Missouri's county articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:51, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Recent edit on Adrian Zenz's page

Hi Neutrality,

I see that we have met again. Anyways, your edit on the 31st of August 2021 from Adrian Zenz's page had removed multiple statements with the accusation that those statements were "Chinese government apologia", "fringe and undue weight". But this was totally unjust. While some of the statements you had disposed were exclusively backed by the deprecated news outlet the Grayzone, you made no effort to argue for any inaccuracies in the valid critiques from the Grayzone articles and not only that, but you had even blasted relevant statements made that were cited by non-deprecated and reliable news outlets.

Furthermore, these were not "undue weight" or "government apologia". They were insignificant statements only placed in the criticism section and there was no mention at all of the Chinese government in the statements you wiped out so there was no possibility that they were defending the Chinese government.

This is a partisan and grotesque silencing of factual criticism. Revert this edit immediately. ButterSlipper (talk) 07:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

• Nope. I've explained in detail on the article talk page why these edits are completely inappropriate (and yes, fringe-promotional and undue weight), especially on a BLP article. Neutrality^talk 17:27, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

• My bad. I will address your obscene falsehoods on that page instead. ButterSlipper (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

• You might be better served by dropping the over-the-top vitriol. Neutrality^talk 00:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

• I do not have "over-the-top vitriol" I am merely just falsifying the absurd claims you've made. If you cannot take criticism for your errors get off the internet.