User talk:FactZheker

Stay Off My Edits and Page

my talk page drmies, What you did was wrong and unethical. You could have deleted any language you feel was biased while still leaving the very factual information that had sources cited. Stay off my page and my edits while I request a review of the suspicious deletion. FactZheker (talk) 00:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)FactZheker

Help me!

Please help me with...

Politically Motivated Deletion

I recently had an entire edit that included cited sources and links deleted. I suspect it was politically oriented as any perceived biased language could have been edited out while maintaining the integrity of the factual information that was added. I need to request a review of the admin activity of account drmies. He appears to be a political operative and has deleted tens of thousands of edits and has blocked tens of thousands of users. How do I request a review? FactZheker (talk) 23:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

References

Helped. I suppose you are referring to Special:Diff/1000401561 that Drmies undid. I would have undone it as well. First of all, you ought to talk about it with Drmies, e.g. on the article talk page. You could follow up with the steps outlined in WP:ADMINABUSE, but I'd say you're not likely to get much support from other editors. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Happy editing, Sam Sailor 01:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Sam Sailor, thank you. I gotta be honest, I'm getting pretty damn tired of all these cries of admin abuse, right-wing vandalism, politically motived edits--this was earlier today. Drmies (talk) 01:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

my talk pageI cited a source for everything I added. Every single thing. It is a clear bias when edits with extensive cited sources, using nationally trusted news sites and congressional press releases from the Person themselves, get deleted. I am not politically motivated nor am I a "right-wing" vandal. I was asked to provide edits and given a list of items to include. If your true motives weren't political censorship then you would have reviewed the sources and deleted any biased language while leave the factual information, which it all was. Just because the actions of a politician are extreme, like Reschenthaler's racism and apology for said racism, doesn't mean that inclusion of those extreme actions in a biography is politically motivated. It's factual. It's who Reschenthaler was. I challenged both of you to find inaccurate items in what I added. FactZheker (talk) 01:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)FactZheker