Jump to content

Talk:Biotin/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created page with '==GA Review== {{Good article tools}} {{subst:GAN/subst|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}} '''Reviewer:''' [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]] (User...'
 
→‎GA Review: initial
Line 7: Line 7:
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
Will look at this. Looking forward to review it while educating myself in another vitamin, {{u|David notMD}}! [[User:HaEr48|HaEr48]] ([[User talk:HaEr48|talk]]) 21:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Will look at this. Looking forward to review it while educating myself in another vitamin, {{u|David notMD}}! [[User:HaEr48|HaEr48]] ([[User talk:HaEr48|talk]]) 21:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Initial comments:
* Biotin is composed of a ureido ring … any link for ureido?
* Is biotin a single compound or a group of related ones like [[Vitamin B12]]?
* "The frequency of marginal biotin status is not known" I don't understand this, is it possible to have other wording or add links to improve understanding?
* The final part of "cofactor biochemistry" seems to be missing citation?
* The lead hints about genetic disorders that cause biotin deficiency, is this the same as the [[biotinidase deficiency]] described in #Deficiency? If yes, can you mention it? If not, what are the genetic disorders?
* "This enzyme is responsible...": How about "Biotinidase is an enzyme responsible ..." ?
* Biotinidase deficiency seems to be introduced twice, in #Deficiency and in #Metabolic disorders. Maybe better combine them? Or just describe fully in the first mention, and name it without intro in the second usage?
* the proteolytic degradation products of each holocarboxylase: Could you explain what ''each'' holocarboxylase refers to?

Per usage talk, will continue reviewing after the nominator finishes making other updates. Thank you! [[User:HaEr48|HaEr48]] ([[User talk:HaEr48|talk]]) 22:40, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:40, 16 January 2021

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HaEr48 (talk · contribs) 21:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will look at this. Looking forward to review it while educating myself in another vitamin, David notMD! HaEr48 (talk) 21:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments:

  • Biotin is composed of a ureido ring … any link for ureido?
  • Is biotin a single compound or a group of related ones like Vitamin B12?
  • "The frequency of marginal biotin status is not known" I don't understand this, is it possible to have other wording or add links to improve understanding?
  • The final part of "cofactor biochemistry" seems to be missing citation?
  • The lead hints about genetic disorders that cause biotin deficiency, is this the same as the biotinidase deficiency described in #Deficiency? If yes, can you mention it? If not, what are the genetic disorders?
  • "This enzyme is responsible...": How about "Biotinidase is an enzyme responsible ..."  ?
  • Biotinidase deficiency seems to be introduced twice, in #Deficiency and in #Metabolic disorders. Maybe better combine them? Or just describe fully in the first mention, and name it without intro in the second usage?
  • the proteolytic degradation products of each holocarboxylase: Could you explain what each holocarboxylase refers to?

Per usage talk, will continue reviewing after the nominator finishes making other updates. Thank you! HaEr48 (talk) 22:40, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]