Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurglin Gutz: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
k |
Akronowner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Keep''' It's easy to find coverage in the ''[https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1995-11-21-9511210328-story.html Chicago Tribune]'', ''[https://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/05/nyregion/new-yorkers-co-toys-and-items-that-began-as-found-objects.html New York Times]'', ''[https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Encyclopedia_of_Major_Marketing_Campaign/MWUPAQAAMAAJ?hl=en Encyclopedia of Major Marketing Campaigns]'', &c. Our policy [[WP:ATD]] applies, "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page.''" [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 10:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' It's easy to find coverage in the ''[https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1995-11-21-9511210328-story.html Chicago Tribune]'', ''[https://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/05/nyregion/new-yorkers-co-toys-and-items-that-began-as-found-objects.html New York Times]'', ''[https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Encyclopedia_of_Major_Marketing_Campaign/MWUPAQAAMAAJ?hl=en Encyclopedia of Major Marketing Campaigns]'', &c. Our policy [[WP:ATD]] applies, "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page.''" [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 10:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Current sources passes [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Akronowner|Akronowner]] ([[User talk:Akronowner|talk]]) 06:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:02, 5 February 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gurglin Gutz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prodded with "he coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies)'s section for products requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar.". Prod removed w/out ratinale. I am not seeing any reliable discussion out there, few mentions in passing, the best is this short passage from the toy creator: [1]. This is a bit longer but of dubious reliability. Non-notable toy. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Toys-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It's easy to find coverage in the Chicago Tribune, New York Times, Encyclopedia of Major Marketing Campaigns, &c. Our policy WP:ATD applies, "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." Andrew🐉(talk) 10:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Current sources passes WP:GNG. Akronowner (talk) 06:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)