Jump to content

Talk:Urartian language: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 21: Line 21:
The article states that the Urartians are also known as Chaldeans. Are these the same Chaldeans of the [[Chaldean Dynasty]]? Because if so, the article on [[Chaldea]] needs correcting, because it is stated there that the Chaldeans were Western Semites.[[User:Woscafrench|Woscafrench]] ([[User talk:Woscafrench|talk]]) 21:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
The article states that the Urartians are also known as Chaldeans. Are these the same Chaldeans of the [[Chaldean Dynasty]]? Because if so, the article on [[Chaldea]] needs correcting, because it is stated there that the Chaldeans were Western Semites.[[User:Woscafrench|Woscafrench]] ([[User talk:Woscafrench|talk]]) 21:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


It was old hypothesis that chaldeans were migrants from Urartu, but, it was contested in the mid-XX century. [[User:Asatrian|Asatrian]] ([[User talk:Asatrian|talk]]) 21:48, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
:It was old hypothesis that chaldeans were migrants from Urartu, but, it was contested in the mid-XX century. [[User:Asatrian|Asatrian]] ([[User talk:Asatrian|talk]]) 21:48, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
:That's a load of horse-raddish. Chaldeans were semitic people - Urartu most definitely was not.[[Special:Contributions/104.169.21.238|104.169.21.238]] ([[User talk:104.169.21.238|talk]]) 15:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:28, 26 February 2021

Edit needing clarification

Moving text from article here
there are many urartian words, that can be found in kurdish languge. It is needing a deliberate research as to the vocabulary and grammar( Asoss).

This edit requires a better reference than the oblique Asoss. __meco 12:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to Armenian language

Are there any scholarly sources that show that Armenian was spoken by the population, or just a web site. The Armenian language has not been attested before ca. 500 AD, in either inscription or in names cited in other languages. Emobatic (talk) 14:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SHALMANAZAR ||| BLAC OBLESK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.90.137.162 (talk) 05:15, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You mean the Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III? Could you please elaborate? What does it say that is relevant in this context? Please don't play guessing games with us. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 21:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chaldean?

The article states that the Urartians are also known as Chaldeans. Are these the same Chaldeans of the Chaldean Dynasty? Because if so, the article on Chaldea needs correcting, because it is stated there that the Chaldeans were Western Semites.Woscafrench (talk) 21:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was old hypothesis that chaldeans were migrants from Urartu, but, it was contested in the mid-XX century. Asatrian (talk) 21:48, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's a load of horse-raddish. Chaldeans were semitic people - Urartu most definitely was not.104.169.21.238 (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]