Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive 6) (bot |
SpicyBiryani (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
::They're a lot of pretty serious allegations against me so my statement was kind of doomed to be long from the start. If any further word count cutting is needed I'll just add a diff to the removed content, but considering the stage of discussion we've reached now, I don't think any more long statements and cutting will be necessary. [[User:SpicyBiryani |<span style="color:#d4ac0d">SpicyBiryani</span>]] [[User talk:SpicyBiryani|<span style="color: #3563f1">(talk)</span>]] 19:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC) |
::They're a lot of pretty serious allegations against me so my statement was kind of doomed to be long from the start. If any further word count cutting is needed I'll just add a diff to the removed content, but considering the stage of discussion we've reached now, I don't think any more long statements and cutting will be necessary. [[User:SpicyBiryani |<span style="color:#d4ac0d">SpicyBiryani</span>]] [[User talk:SpicyBiryani|<span style="color: #3563f1">(talk)</span>]] 19:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
:::{{u|SpicyBiryani}}, that is incorrect. Significant trimming is still necessary as your response to the complaint continues to grossly exceed to assigned word limit. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 19:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC) |
:::{{u|SpicyBiryani}}, that is incorrect. Significant trimming is still necessary as your response to the complaint continues to grossly exceed to assigned word limit. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 19:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
:::: Right, I'm doing it now. It was 1 in the morning for me when you posted this so I couldn't do it then. [[User:SpicyBiryani |<span style="color:#d4ac0d">SpicyBiryani</span>]] [[User talk:SpicyBiryani|<span style="color: #3563f1">(talk)</span>]] 07:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:55, 27 February 2021
![]() | Note: This talk page should only be used for discussion about the way arbitration enforcement operates: how to use the enforcement noticeboard, who can post and why, etc. All discussion about specific enforcement requests should be routed through the main noticeboard or other relevant pages for discussion. Discussion about the committee in general should go to a wider audience at WT:AC or WT:ACN.
→ Please click here to start a new topic. ← |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
Note about these archives In 2008 the committee amalgamated all talk pages of the various arbitration requests subpages, and from then AE-related discussion took place at WT:AC. In 2015 this decision was overturned and AE regained a stand-alone talk page (with the committee ruling that it should have one solely for procedural and meta-discussion, with it not being used to rehash enforcement requests themselves). There are therefore two distinct archives for this page. Archive 3 and onwards are from after the restoration of the talk page. Archive 1 and 2 above are the archives from before the amalgamation. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Page restriction request
Could someone assist Armatura with asking for a page restriction as a discretionary sanction? See Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan_2#1RR_for_Battle_of_Shusha_(2020). The template doesn't seem to work for page restrictions. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 00:20, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- Many thanks, KevinL, for trying to help. Also asked on the article talk page, hoping that one of the admins who dealt with NKR-related topics previously might assist. Regards, Armatura (talk) 00:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- WP:AN would be the easiest one, but the request makes perfect sense to me, and I will impose the sanction in about an hour when I get to the office, no need to duplicate.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:53, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Time to archive
Could we possibly switch from seven days to at most like five days? This board is getting a little cramped with closed requests. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Info about the 500 words limit
Hi, I didn't understand if, for the one who fills out the form, the limit of 500 words only concerns this part:
Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation how these edits violate it
Or also this part
Additional comments by editor filing complaint
Can I write 500 words in all? Or only in the first part 500, while in the second there are no limits?
Thank you, I'm so noob.--Mhorg (talk) 19:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- I think the word limit applies to the total of all the explanatory words you add, in whatever section. EdJohnston (talk) 19:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Concern about recent influx of collapsed content
My sense is that this doesn't happen often here (trimming by collapsing). But ever since MVBW started doing so in the report that features themselves, it seems to have spread to most other AE requests currently live. I just wanted to emphasize that I'm not particularly a fan of the practice, so I do hope it doesn't become a regular thing. Thoughts? El_C 17:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I will not do it again. My very best wishes (talk) 17:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hey, no worries. El_C 17:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Collapsing in a thread about collapsing? Well, yes! Anyway, let's not have the actual content behind these various complaints spillover tooo much in this discussion. Thanks. El_C 18:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
|
---|
|
- Additional pings to users who are using collapsed content in AE requests at the present moment: Paul Siebert, Nicoljaus, Springee, LokiTheLiar, SpicyBiryani (a lot). Also, to expand a bit: my view is that collapsed content sorta works to circumvent the word limit, so, I think that a simple diff showing what was removed, would better live up to the spirit of that requirement. Thanks! El_C 17:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- My collapsed content is a timeline, and needs to be to show reverts over time. I would just link the relevant history page except that people specifically requested that I provide more evidence when I did that. Loki (talk) 17:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough, Loki. That kind of usage of collapsed content is one which I think actually is appropriate for the noticeboard. El_C 18:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- They're a lot of pretty serious allegations against me so my statement was kind of doomed to be long from the start. If any further word count cutting is needed I'll just add a diff to the removed content, but considering the stage of discussion we've reached now, I don't think any more long statements and cutting will be necessary. SpicyBiryani (talk) 19:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- SpicyBiryani, that is incorrect. Significant trimming is still necessary as your response to the complaint continues to grossly exceed to assigned word limit. El_C 19:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Right, I'm doing it now. It was 1 in the morning for me when you posted this so I couldn't do it then. SpicyBiryani (talk) 07:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- SpicyBiryani, that is incorrect. Significant trimming is still necessary as your response to the complaint continues to grossly exceed to assigned word limit. El_C 19:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- My collapsed content is a timeline, and needs to be to show reverts over time. I would just link the relevant history page except that people specifically requested that I provide more evidence when I did that. Loki (talk) 17:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)