Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of longest-running licensed video game franchises: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
*'''Delete''' on top of what’s been mentioned I’m don’t believe the multiple video games that are adaptions of a franchise made by multiple developers and handled by several different publishes should be considered a franchise in its own right as the article is currently implying. To put it another way it makes sense to say that [[Batman (1986 video game)]] and [[Batman: The Enemy Within]] are parts of the overall Batman franchise but considering all the Batman video game together as it’s own franchises doesn’t.--[[Special:Contributions/70.27.244.104|70.27.244.104]] ([[User talk:70.27.244.104|talk]]) 23:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' on top of what’s been mentioned I’m don’t believe the multiple video games that are adaptions of a franchise made by multiple developers and handled by several different publishes should be considered a franchise in its own right as the article is currently implying. To put it another way it makes sense to say that [[Batman (1986 video game)]] and [[Batman: The Enemy Within]] are parts of the overall Batman franchise but considering all the Batman video game together as it’s own franchises doesn’t.--[[Special:Contributions/70.27.244.104|70.27.244.104]] ([[User talk:70.27.244.104|talk]]) 23:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
* '''comment''' they are still part of the same franchise rights can transfer though the years just like unlicensed games they would be part of the same franchise so that not really a problem [[User:Fanoflionking|Fan Of Lion King 🦁]] ([[User talk:Fanoflionking|talk]]) 15:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
* '''comment''' they are still part of the same franchise rights can transfer though the years just like unlicensed games they would be part of the same franchise so that not really a problem [[User:Fanoflionking|Fan Of Lion King 🦁]] ([[User talk:Fanoflionking|talk]]) 15:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
::Yes they are part of the overall franchise but the list is suggesting they the games themselves are a franchise which is a different thing.--[[Special:Contributions/70.27.244.104|70.27.244.104]] ([[User talk:70.27.244.104|talk]]) 16:36, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:36, 4 March 2021

List of longest-running licensed video game franchises (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are many problems with this list, but I think the biggest is that it fails WP:LISTN. There's no way a list like this is appropriate, given that it's basically a duplicate of List of longest-running video game franchises, a far better list, just with some entries excluded. This list also doesn't even have a proper inclusion criterion. You could add literally any IP that got a handful of games, thus defeating the entire point of a list called "List of longest-running licensed video game franchises". Namcokid47 16:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes they are part of the overall franchise but the list is suggesting they the games themselves are a franchise which is a different thing.--70.27.244.104 (talk) 16:36, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]