User talk:Dipendra2007

April 2021

Hi Dipendra2007 (talk) Similar events might take place around Bengal, but those have their individual own names and history, is different from the concept ( arguably tax collection) of "Pahela Baishakh" and have their own characteristics. Hence no relevancy in this case. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tithi.sarkar (talk • contribs) 16:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

I still do not understand why you reverted my edits supported by citations. The Bengali New Year is celebrated in Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Sri Lanka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Punjab pretty much on the same day. That sure is relevant, is it not? There are parallels here. Dipendra2007 (talk) 16:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Dipendra2007 (talk), Excuse you? I wasn't the one who reverted your edits through IP address.Please have some courtesy before accusing someone with no backup.

Thank you for letting me know, Tithi Sarkar. I appreciate that. Dipendra2007 (talk) 23:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Please don't engage in edit wars on Pahela Baishakh. Consult on the talk page before making any significant changes on the article.(Going to say the same to the other user also)

Vikrami Calendar isn't particularly Bengali calendar hence it's irrelevant to Pahela Baishakh. Adding this to the article will lead the page nowhere, would just cause a mess. If you're concerned about other new year festivals throughout South Asia, add those to "Related to" on the info box or on "See also". Please be co operative with other users, picture discriptions according to the quality/majority of sources and keep the page neutral. Thank you :) Tithi.sarkar (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:52, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

---

Tithi

I am not sure whether you and that Anonymous IP number are one and the same individual. I did explain everything on the Talk Page and with you bilaterally. You and that individual give the identical reasons to summarily revert the material I had restored. I am only restoring information provided by previous editors (Sarah Welch and others) who had provided robust and rigorous citations. As I said, that page now needs an independent review.

Dipendra2007 (talk) 03:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

I'll have to agree with Tithi here. Vikrami calendar and other Indic new years aren't relevant to this article no matter how many sources that are based on this. These festivals are already added in "related to" and in "see also". This is a page about Pahela Baishakh alone and let it be that way.Don't make a hotch potch by adding irrelevant topics directly to the article. You can just add those in related to or see also section. Okaymishti (talk) 07:50, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

---

Tithi and Okaymishti

You are deleting material pertaining to the Hindu or Indic or Bikramaditto origins while retaining information on the Mughal origins. That is not neutral. Let's move this conversation to the Talk Page of Pahela Baishakh. I will be deleting this section on my Page. This is not the Talk Page to discuss, that Talk Page is. The material you have deleted pertains to the origins of Pahela Baishakh and is therefore relevant. Dipendra2007 (talk) 10:37, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

We're giving identical reasons because that's exactly what the point is. We're keeping the Mughal origin because it's about the Bengali calendar and Bengal region itself hence it's completely relevant while other indic festivals aren't. It doesn't matter who celebrates what on the other parts on other parts of the world. Don't put irrelevant stuff on an article. Vikrami calendar and the event is mentioned is irrelevant stuff on this page. However ,for the sake of relevancy and neural understanding, it's already added in the box,check the related to section. Tithi.sarkar (talk) 12:25, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dipendra2007. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dipendra2007. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dipendra2007. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tamil calendar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pongal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Tamil calendar into Puthandu. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — 🎆 Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Diannaa

Thank you for the useful information. I was the sole author of the text/paragraph inserted in both pages. Best Dipendra2007 (talk) 14:32, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)