Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parsa Khaef: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
delete |
No edit summary |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
*'''Delete''' - The article does not [[WP:SPEAKSELF|speak for itself]] as to either [[WP:GNG|general notability]] or [[WP:NMUSIC|musical notability]]. The article has already been moved to draft space once and re-created in article space, either [[WP:TE|tendentiously]] or to [[WP:GAME|game the system]]. The article has [[WP:REFBOMB|reference-bombed]], and an article on a [[WP:MILL|run-of-the-mill]] subject with 27 sources is still an article on a run-of-the-mill subject. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 12:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - The article does not [[WP:SPEAKSELF|speak for itself]] as to either [[WP:GNG|general notability]] or [[WP:NMUSIC|musical notability]]. The article has already been moved to draft space once and re-created in article space, either [[WP:TE|tendentiously]] or to [[WP:GAME|game the system]]. The article has [[WP:REFBOMB|reference-bombed]], and an article on a [[WP:MILL|run-of-the-mill]] subject with 27 sources is still an article on a run-of-the-mill subject. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 12:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
''' Keep ''' |
|||
How long will this discussion last and will you help me improve it instead of deleting the article? I will give you whatever you want |
Revision as of 13:02, 9 June 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Parsa Khaef (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable musical artist. fails WP:GNG. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep
My friend, many sources have been mentioned and are still available, but I did not add them because it seemed to be enough. But if you think they are not enough, I will add.
Because deleting this article is cruel despite all the sources
Keep
Put a little rigor aside because this article is too valid and deleting it may not be fair
- Delete - The article does not speak for itself as to either general notability or musical notability. The article has already been moved to draft space once and re-created in article space, either tendentiously or to game the system. The article has reference-bombed, and an article on a run-of-the-mill subject with 27 sources is still an article on a run-of-the-mill subject. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep
How long will this discussion last and will you help me improve it instead of deleting the article? I will give you whatever you want