Talk:Redoxon: Difference between revisions
David notMD (talk | contribs) →Improving article: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Could use information on whether the Reichstein process is still being used for synthesizing vitamin C for Redoxon, or has been replaced by improved bacterial processes or chemistry-only processes. [[User:David notMD|David notMD]] ([[User talk:David notMD|talk]]) 15:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC) |
Could use information on whether the Reichstein process is still being used for synthesizing vitamin C for Redoxon, or has been replaced by improved bacterial processes or chemistry-only processes. [[User:David notMD|David notMD]] ([[User talk:David notMD|talk]]) 15:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC) |
||
== History == |
|||
The article is quite ok so far; hopefully the information it contains is correct. I have one small suggestion to make, though: |
|||
Currently it reads: |
|||
"After the sale of the Reichstein process patent to Hoffmann-La Roche" |
|||
I would recommend adding the year, aka when that sale happened, directly in the article. Right now the visitor has to find |
|||
out when that happened, so it would be more convenient to just add the year (once verified it is correct). On a side note, |
|||
the time to discovery/creation e. g. in 1934, may be interesting to see more details as to the build up of it. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F|2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F]] ([[User talk:2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F|talk]]) 11:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:56, 14 June 2021
![]() | Dietary Supplements Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 November 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Improving article
Could use information on whether the Reichstein process is still being used for synthesizing vitamin C for Redoxon, or has been replaced by improved bacterial processes or chemistry-only processes. David notMD (talk) 15:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
History
The article is quite ok so far; hopefully the information it contains is correct. I have one small suggestion to make, though:
Currently it reads:
"After the sale of the Reichstein process patent to Hoffmann-La Roche"
I would recommend adding the year, aka when that sale happened, directly in the article. Right now the visitor has to find out when that happened, so it would be more convenient to just add the year (once verified it is correct). On a side note, the time to discovery/creation e. g. in 1934, may be interesting to see more details as to the build up of it. 2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 11:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)