Talk:Socrates/GA1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:22, 11 July 2021

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ardenter (talk · contribs) 06:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning

Hello! I'm going to review this over the coming days.

The box

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Stability

The content has been moderately changed recently for this review, but there are no edit wars or disputes. It seems good. Ardenter (talk) 07:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Images

The images for the majority of the article are illustrative. However, there is a lack of images in the philosophy section. I'm going to review 6b once sufficient images are added. Ardenter (talk) 07:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style and neutral point of view at present

There appear to be quite a few Manual of Style issues. The section "Virtue and Knowledge" should be "Virtue and knowledge". A lot have words to watch. "But it contradicts other statements of Socrates, when he claims he has knowledge" would adhere as "In other statements by Socrates, he claims he has knowledge." "It was this sign that prevented Socrates from entering into politics, Socrates claimed at his trial" would adhere as "Socrates claimed at his trial that this sign prevented Socrates from entering into politics." Those should serve as an example. It needs serious clean up regarding words to watch and needs to clearer define who is making points. The article needs a lot of revisions here. I'm going to fail these now. Ardenter (talk) 07:21, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 |
 #It is '''reasonably well written'''.
-#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|}}<br/> b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|}}
+#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|}}<br/> b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|n}}
 #It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
 #:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|}}
@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 #:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|}}
 #It follows the '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy'''.
-#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|}}
+#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|n}}
 #It is '''stable'''.
 #:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|y}}