This article or section is in the process of an expansion or major restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this article or section, please remove this template.
If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with
|Born||c. 470 BC|
|Died||399 BC (aged approximately 71)|
|Cause of death||Execution by forced suicide by poisoning|
|Era||Ancient Greek philosophy|
|School||Classical Greek philosophy|
|Epistemology, ethics, teleology|
|Part of a series on|
"I know that I know nothing"
"The unexamined life is not worth living"
gadfly · Trial of Socrates
Socratic dialogue · Socratic intellectualism
Socratic irony · Socratic method
Socratic paradox · Socratic questioning
Socratic problem · Socratici viri
Plato · Xenophon
Antisthenes · Aristippus · Aeschines
|Academic Skepticism · Megarians · Cynicism · Cyrenaics · Platonism · Aristotelianism · Stoicism · Virtue ethics · The Clouds|
Socrates (//; Ancient Greek: Σωκράτης Sōkrátēs [sɔːkrátɛːs]; c. 470 – 399 BC) was a Greek philosopher from Athens who is credited as one of the founders of Western philosophy, and as being the first moral philosopher of the Western ethical tradition of thought. An enigmatic figure, he authored no texts, and is known chiefly through the accounts of classical writers composing after his lifetime, particularly his students Plato and Xenophon. Other sources include the contemporaneous Antisthenes, Aristippus, and Aeschines of Sphettos. Aristophanes, a playwright, is the main contemporary author to have written plays mentioning Socrates during Socrates' lifetime, although a fragment of Ion of Chios' Travel Journal provides important information about Socrates' youth.
Plato's dialogues are among the most comprehensive accounts of Socrates to survive from antiquity, from which Socrates has become renowned for his contributions to the fields of ethics and epistemology. It is this Platonic Socrates who lends his name to the concepts of Socratic irony and the Socratic method, or elenchus. However, questions remain regarding the distinction between the real-life Socrates and Plato's portrayal of Socrates in his dialogues.
Socrates exerted a strong influence on philosophers in later antiquity and in the modern era. Depictions of Socrates in art, literature and popular culture have made him one of the most widely known figures in the Western philosophical tradition.
Sources and the Socratic problem
Socrates didn't write down any of his teachings and what we know of him comes from the accounts of others; mainly his pupils, the philosopher Plato and the historian Xenophon, the comedian Aristophanes (Socrates's contemporary), and lastly Aristotle, who was born after Socrates’s death. The often contradictory stories of the ancient sources make it incredibly difficult to reliably reconstruct Socrates’s thoughts in the proper context; this dilemma is called the Socratic problem.
Xenophon was a well educated, honest man but he lacked the intelligence of a trained philosopher and couldn't conceptualize or articulate Socrates’s arguments. Xenophon admired Socrates for his intelligence, patriotic stance during wartimes, and courage. Xenophon discusses Socrates in four of his works: the Memorabilia, the Oeconomicus, the Symposium, and the Apology of Socrates—he also mentions a story with Socrates in his Anabasis. Oeconomicus hosts a discussion on practical agricultural issues. Apologia offers the speeches of Socrates during his trial but is unsophisticated compared to Plato's work of the same title. Symposium is a dialogue of Socrates with other prominent Athenieans after dinner—quite different from Plato's Symposium—differing even in the names of those attending, let alone Socrates’s presented ideas. In Memorabilia, he defends, as he proclaimed, Socrates from the accusations against him of corrupting the youth and being against State religion. Essentially, it is a collection of various stories and constituted an apology of Socrates. In a seminal work of 1818, philosopher Friedrich Schleiermacher attacked Xenophon’s accounts, and his attack was widely accepted and gave rise to the Socratic problem. Schleiermacher criticized Xenophon on his naïve representation of Socrates—the latter was a soldier and was unable to articulate Socratic ideas. Further, Xenophon is biased in favor of his friend, believing Socrates was unfairly treated by Athens, and sought to prove his points of view rather than reconstruct an impartial account—with the result being the portrayal of an uninspiring philosopher. By early 20th century, Xenophon’s account was largely rejected.
Plato's representation of Socrates is not straightforward. Plato was a pupil of Socrates and outlived him by five decades. How trustworthy Plato is on representing Socrates is a matter of debate; the view that he wouldn't alter Socratic thought (known as Tailor-Burket thesis) isn't shared by many contemporary scholars. A driver of this doubt is the inconsistency of the character of Socrates he presents. One common explanation of the inconsistency is that Plato initially tried to accurately represent the historical Socrates, but later inserted his views on Socrates’s sayings—under this understanding, there is a distinction among the early writing of Plato as Socratic Socrates, whereas late writing represent Platonic Socrates—a definitive line between the two being blurred.
The works of Xenophon and Plato on Socrates are in the form of dialogue and provide the main source of information on Socrates's life and thought and compose the major part of Logoi Socraticoi, a term coined by Aristotle to describe its contemporary newly formed literature genre on Socrates. As Aristotle first noted, authors imitate Socrates, but the extent to which they represent the real Socrates or are works of fiction is a matter of debate. Xenophon’s and Plato’s accounts differ in their presentations of Socrates as a person—in Xenophon’s portrait, he is more dull, and less humorous and ironic. Plato's Socrates is far from conservative Xenophon's Socrates. Generally, Logoi Socraticoi can not help us reconstruct historical Socrates even in cases where their narratives overlap due to possible intertextuality.
Aristotle was not a contemporary of Socrates; he studied under Plato at the latter’s Academy for twenty years. Aristotle treats Socrates without the bias of Xenophon and Plato, who had an emotional bias in favor of Socrates—he scrutinizes Socrates’s doctrines as a philosopher. Aristotle was familiar with the various written and unwritten stories of Socrates. Athenian comedians, including Aristophanes, commented on Socrates. His most important comedy with respect to Socrates, Clouds, where Socrates is a central character of the play, is the only one to survive today. Aristophanes limns a caricature of Socrates that leans towards sophistism. Current literature does not deem Aristophanes’s work as helpful to reconstruct the historical Socrates, except with respect to some characteristics of his personality. Other ancient authors on Socrates were Aeschines of Sphettus, Antisthenes, Aristippus, Bryson, Cebes, Crito, Euclid of Megara, and Phaedo; all of whom wrote after Socrates's death.
Reconstruction of Socrates
Two factors emerge from all sources pertaining to the character of Socrates: that he was “ugly” (at least as an older man), and had a brilliant intellect. He wore tattered clothes and went barefoot (the latter characteristic made its way into the play The Clouds by Aristophanes). He lived entirely within ancient Athens (at least from his late 30s, and other than when serving on military campaigns in Potidaea, Delium, etc.); he made no writings; and he was executed by being made to drink hemlock.
Socrates as a figure
The character of Socrates as exhibited in Apology, Crito, Phaedo and Symposium concurs with other sources to an extent to which it seems possible to rely on the Platonic Socrates, as demonstrated in the dialogues, as a representation of the actual Socrates as he lived in history. At the same time, however, many scholars believe that in some works, Plato, being a literary artist, pushed his avowedly brightened-up version of "Socrates" far beyond anything the historical Socrates was likely to have done or said. Also, Xenophon, being a historian, is a more reliable witness to the historical Socrates. It is a matter of much debate over which Socrates it is whom Plato is describing at any given point—the historical figure, or Plato's fictionalization. As British philosopher Martin Cohen has put it, "Plato, the idealist, offers an idol [Socrates], a master figure, for philosophy. A Saint, a prophet of 'the Sun-God', a teacher condemned for his teachings as a heretic."
It is also clear from other writings and historical artifacts, that Socrates was not simply a character, nor an invention, of Plato. The testimony of Xenophon and Aristotle, alongside some of Aristophanes' work (especially The Clouds), is useful in fleshing out a perception of Socrates beyond Plato's work.
According to one source, the name Σωκρᾰ́της (Sōkrátēs), has the meaning "whole, unwounded, safe" (the part of the name corresponding to σῶς, sôs) and "power" (the part of the name corresponding to κράτος, krátos).
Socrates as a philosopher
The problem with discerning Socrates' philosophical views stems from the perception of contradictions in statements made by the Socrates in the different dialogues of Plato; in later dialogues Plato used the character, Socrates, to give voice to views that were his own. These contradictions produce doubt as to the actual philosophical doctrines of Socrates, within his milieu and as recorded by other individuals. Aristotle, in his Magna Moralia, refers to Socrates in words which make it patent that the doctrine virtue is knowledge was held by Socrates. Within the Metaphysics, Aristotle states Socrates was occupied with the search for moral virtues, being the "first to search for universal definitions for them".
The problem of understanding Socrates as a philosopher is shown in the following: In Xenophon's Symposium, Socrates is reported as saying he devotes himself only to what he regards as the most important art or occupation, that of discussing philosophy. However, in The Clouds, Aristophanes portrays Socrates as running a Sophist school with Chaerephon. Also, in Plato's Apology and Symposium, as well as in Xenophon's accounts, Socrates explicitly denies accepting payment for teaching. More specifically, in the Apology, Socrates cites his poverty as proof that he is not a teacher.
Two fragments are extant of the writings by the Pyrrhonist philosopher Timon of Phlius pertaining to Socrates. Both appear to be from Timon's Silloi in which Timon ridiculed and lampooned dogmatic philosophers.
Socrates was born in 469 or 470 BC in Alopece, a deme of Athens, with both of his parents, Sophroniscus and Phaenarete being wealthy Athenians, thus he was an Athenian citizen. Sophroniscus was a stoneworker while Phaenarete was a midwife. He was raised living close to his father's relatives and inherited, as it was the custom in Ancient Athens, part of his father estate, that secured a life without financial scourges. His education was according to laws and custums of Athens, he learned the basic skills to read and write, as all Athenians and also, as most wealthy Athenians received extra lessons in various other fields such as gymnastic, poetry and music. He married once or twice. One of his marriages was with Xanthippe when Socrates was in his 50s, the other one was with the daughter of Aristides, an Athenian statesman. He had 3 sons with Xanthippe. Socrates fulfilled his military service during the Peloponnesian War and distinguished in three campaigns.
During 406 Socrates participated as a member of the Boule to the trial of six commanders since his tribe (the Antiochis) comprised the prytany. The generals were accused that they had abandoned the survivors of foundered ships to pursue the defeated Spartan navy. The generals were seen by some to have failed to uphold the most basic of duties, and the people demanded their capital punishment by having them under trial all together- not separately as the law of Athens dictated. While other members of the prytany bow to public pressure, Socrates stand alone not accepting an illegal suggestion.
Another incident that illustrates Socrates attachment to the law, is the arrest of Leon. As Plato describes in his Apology Socrates and four others were summoned to the Tholos, and told by representatives of the oligarchy of the Thirty (the oligarchy began ruling in 404 BC) to go to Salamis to arrest Leon the Salaminian, who was to be brought back to be subsequently executed. However, Socrates was the only one of the five men who chose not to go to Salamis as he was expected to, because he did not want to be involved in what he considered a crime and despite the risk of subsequent retribution from the tyrants.
As a character Socrates was a fascinating man, attracting the interest of Athenian crowd and especially youth like a magnet. He was notoriously ugly—having flat turned-up nose, bulky eyes and a belly—his friends used to joke with his appearance. On top of being ugly, Socrates didn't pay any attention to his personal appearance. He walked barefoot, had only one torn coat and didn't bathe frequently, friends called him "the unwashed". He restrained from excesses such as food and sex despite his high sex drive, also he did consumed much wine but never was he drunk. Socrates was physically attracted by both sexes- common and accepted in ancient Greece- but resisted his passion towards young men as he was interested in educating their souls. Socrates was known for his self control and never sought to gain sexual favors from his disciplines, as it happened with other older men while teaching adolescents. Politically, he was sitting on the fence in terms of the rivalry between the democrats and the oligarchs in the ancient Athens—he criticizes sharply both while they were on power.
Trial of Socrates
In 399 BC, Socrates went on trial for corrupting the minds of the youth of Athens and for impiety. Socrates defended himself but was subsequently found guilty by a jury of 500 male Athenian citizens (280 vs 220 votes). According to the then custom, he proposed a penalty (in his case Socrates offered some money) but jurors declined his offer and commanded the death penalty. The official charges were corrupting youth, worshipping false gods and not worshipping the state religion.
In 404 BC, Athenians were crushed by Spartans at the decisive naval Battle of Aegospotami, and subsequently, Spartans sieged Athens. They replaced the democratic government with a new, pro-oligarchic government, named the Thirty Tyrants. Because of their tyrannical measures, some Athenians organized to overthrow the Tyrants – and indeed they managed in doing so briefly – but as the Spartan request for aid from the Thirty arrived, a compromise was sought. But as Spartans left again, democrats seized the opportunity to kill the oligarchs and reclaim the government of Athens. Under this politically tense climate in 399, Socrates was charged.
The accusations against Socrates were initiated by a poet, Meletus, who asked for the death penalty because of Asebeia. Other accusers were Anytus and Lycon, of which Anutus was a powerful democratic politician who was despised by Socrates, and his pupils, Critias and Alkiviadis. After a month or two, in late Spring or early Summer, the trial started and lasted a day.
The charges stood true; indeed Socrates criticized the anthropomorphism of traditional Greek religion, describing it in several cases as a daimonion, an inner voice. 
The Socratic apology (meaning the defense of Socrates) started with Socrates answering the various rumors against him that gave rise to the indictment. Firstly, Socrates defended against the rumor that he was an atheist naturalist philosopher, as portrayed in Aristophanes' The Clouds, or a sophist – a category of professional philosophy teachers notorious for their relativism. Against these corruption allegations, Socrates answered that he did not corrupt anyone intentionally, since corrupting someone would mean that one would be corrupted back, and that corruption is not desirable. On the second charge, Socrates asked for clarification. Meletus, one of the accusers, clarified that the accusation was that Socrates was a complete atheist. Socrates was quick to note the contradiction with the next accusation: worshipping false gods. After that, Socrates claimed that he was God's gift, and since his activities ultimately benefited Athens, by condemning him to death, Athens would lose. After that, he claimed that even though no human can reach wisdom, philosophizing is the best thing someone can do, implying money and prestige are not as precious as commonly thought. After jurors convicted him and sentenced him to death, he warned Athenians that criticism by his many disciplines was inescapable, unless they became good men.
Socrates had the chance to offer alternative punishments for himself after being found guilty. He could have requested permission to flee Athens and live in exile, however he didn't bring it up. Instead, according to Plato, he asked for free meals daily, or alternatively, to pay a small fine, while Xenophon says he made no proposals. Jurors decided upon the death penalty, to be carried out the next day. Socrates spent his last day in the prison, with his friends visiting him and offering him an escape; however, he declined.
The question of what motivated Athenians to choose to convict Socrates remains a point of controversy among scholars. The two notable theories are, first, that Socrates was convicted on religious grounds and, second, on to political ones. The case for being a political persecution is usually objected to by the existence of the amnesty that was granted in 403 BC to prevent escalation to civil war; but, as the text from Socrates' trial and other texts reveals, the accusers could have fueled their rhetoric using events prior to 403. Also, later, ancient authors claimed in various unrelated events that the prosecution was political. For example, Aeschines of Sphettus (ca. 425–350 BC) writes: I wonder how one ought to deal with the fact that Alcibiades and Critias were the associates of Socrates, against whom the many and the upper classes made such strong accusations. It is hard to imagine a more pernicious person than Critias, who stood out among the Thirty, the most wicked of the Greeks. People say that these men ought not be used as evidence that Socrates corrupted the youth, nor should their sins be used in any way whatsoever with respect to Socrates, who does not deny carrying on conversations with the young." It was true that Socrates did not stand for democracy during the reign of Thirty, and that most of his pupils were anti-democrats. The argument for religious persecution is supported by the fact that the accounts of the trial by both Plato and Xenophon mostly focused on the charges of impiety. And, while it was true that Socrates didn't believe in Athenian gods, he did not dispute this while he was defending himself. On the other hand, there were many skeptics and atheist philosophers during that time that evaded prosecution, notably demonstrated in the political satire of The Clouds by Aristophanes that was staged years before the trial. Yet another interpretation, more contemporary and more convincing, synthesises religious and political arguments, since during those times, religion and state were not separated.
|Part of a series on|
|Allegories and metaphors|
A fundamental characteristic of Plato's Socrates is the Socratic method or method of "elenchus (elenchus or elenchos, in Latin and Greek respectively, means refutation). It is most prominent in the early works of Plato, such as Apology, Crito, Gorgias, Republic I and other. Socrates would initiate a discussion about a topic with a known expert on the topic, then by dialogue will prove them wrong by detecting inconsistencies in his reasoning. Firstly, Socrates asks his interlocutor for a definition of the subject, then Socrates will ask more questions where the answers of the interlocutor will be in odds with his first definition, with the conclusion the opinion of the expert is wrong. Interlocutor may came up with a different definition which again be placed under the scrutiny of Socrates questions repeatedly, with each round approaching truth even more or realizing the ignorance on the matter. Since the definition of interlocuter represent most commonly, the mainstream opinion on a matter, the discussion places doubt in the shared opinion. Also, another key component of Socratic method, is that he also tests his own opinions, exposing their weakness as with others, thus Socrates is not teaching or even preaching ex cathedra a fixed philosophical doctrine, but rather he humbly acknowledging the man's ignorance while participating himself in searching the truth with his pupils and interlocutors. 
Scholars have questioned the validity and the exact nature of socratic method or even if there is one indeed. In 1982, preeminent scholar of ancient philosophy Gregory Vlastos identified a flaw in the Socratic Method. The Socratic Method could not be used to establish truth or falsehood of any particular beliefs. It was simply a potent instrument for exposing inconsistency within an interlocutor's beliefs.  There have been two main lines of replying to Vlastos arguments, depending on whether is accepted if Socrates is seeking to prove wrong a claim. . According to the first line, known as the constructivist, Socrates indeed seeks to refute a claim by his method, and it actually helps us reaching positive statements. The non-constructivism approach holds that Socrates merely wants to establish the inconsistency among the premises and conclusion of the initial argument.
Socrates and the priority of definition
Socrates used to start its discussion with his interlocutor with the search for definitions. Socrates, in most cases, expects for an someone, who claims expertly on a subject, to have knowledge of the definition of his subject, ie Virtue, or Goodness, before further discussing it. Giving definition a priority to any kind of knowledge, is profound in various of his dialogues, as in Hippias Major or Euthyphro. Some scholars thought have argued that Socrates does not endorse this usualness as a principle, either because they can locate examples of not doing so (ie in Laches, when searching examples of courage in order to define it). In this line, Gregory Vlastos, and other scholars, have argued that the endorsement of the priority principle, actually is a platonic endorsement.  Philosophy professor Peter Geach who accepts that Socrates endorses the priority of definitions, finds it though fallacious and he comments: "We know heaps of things without being able to define the terms in which we express our knowledge". Vlastos also, discussing the "Socratic fallacy", detects an inconsistency of Socrates since on one hand he portrays himself as a strong opinioned moral philosopher, on the other hand he is not sure whether his doctrines are true or not. The debate on the issue is still unsettled.
Plato's Socrates often claims that he is aware of his own lack of knowledge, especially when discussing ethics (such as areté, goodness, courage) since he does not possess the knowledge of essential nature of such concepts. For example, Socrates says during his trial, when his life was at stake: "I thought Evenus a happy man, if he really possesses this art ( technē ), and teaches for so moderate a fee. Certainly I would pride and preen myself if I knew ( epistamai ) these things, but I do not know ( epistamai ) them, gentlemen". In another case, when he was informed that the prestigious Oracle of Delphi declare that there is no-one wiser than Socrates, he concluded "So I withdrew and thought to myself: ‘I am wiser ( sophoteron ) than this man; it is likely that neither of us knows ( eidenai ) anything worthwhile, but he thinks he knows something when he does not, whereas when I do not know, neither do I think I know; so I am likely to be wiser than he to this small extent, that I do not think I know what I do not know". But, in some Plato's dialogue, Socrates appears to credit himself with some knowledge and also he seems strongly opinioned which is weird of a man to hold a strong belief when he posses he has no knowledge at all. For example, at his apology, he says "It is perhaps on this point and in this respect, gentlemen, that I differ from the majority of men, and if I were to claim that I am wiser than anyone in anything, it would be in this, that, as I have no adequate knowledge ( ouk eidōs hikanōs ) of things in the underworld, so I do not think I have. I do know ( oida ), however, that it is wicked and shameful to do wrong ( adikein ), to disobey one’s superior, be he god or man. I shall never fear or avoid things of which I do not know, whether they may not be good rather than things that I know ( oida ) to be bad."
This antiphasis has puzzled scholars. There are varying explanations of the inconsistency, mostly by interpreting knowledge with a different meaning but there is a consensus that Socrates holds that realizing one's lack of knowledge is the first step towards wisdom. While Socrates claims he acquired cognitive achievement in some domains of knowledge, in most important domains in ethics he denies any wisdom.
There is a widespread assumption that Socrates is an ironist, this is mostly based on the depiction of Socrates by Plato and Aristotle. Irony of Socrates is so subtle and slightly humorous, that often leaves reader wondering if Socrates is making an intentional pun. Plato's Euthyphro is filled with Socratic irony. The story begins when Socrates, is meeting with Euthyphro, a man that has accused his own father for murder- then turning your father to authorities was pretty unpopular. Socrates bites Euthyphro several times, without his interlocutor understanding the irony of Socrates. When Socrates first hears the details of the story, he comments, "It is not, I think, any random person who could do this [prosecute one’s father] correctly, but surely one who is already far progressed in wisdom". When Euthyphro is boasting about his understanding of divinity, Socrates responds "most important that I become your student". Socrates is seen as an ironist ironic commonly when using praises to flatter or when addressing his interlocutors.
Socratic irony was detected by Aristotle, but linked to a different meaning. Aristotle used the term eirōneia (a greek world, later latinized and ending up us the english word irony) to describe Socrates self-deprecation. Eironeia, then, contrary to modern meaning, meant to conceal a narrative that was not stated, while today's irony, the message is clear, even though untold literally. Explanation of why Socrates uses irony divides scholars. The mainstream opinion is that has been around since Cicero, perceives irony is adding a playful note to Socrates that grasp the attention of the audience. Another line is that Socrates conceals his philosophical message with irony, making it accessable only to those who can separate what parts of his thought are ironic and what is not. Gregory Vlastos identified a more complex pattern of irony in Socrates, where his words have double meaning, in which one meaning is being ironical, the other is not- an opinion that didn't convinced many other scholars though.
Not everyone were amused by Socratic irony. Epicourians, the only post-Socrates philosophical school in ancient times that didn't identified themselves as antecessors of Socrates, based their criticism to Socrates to his ironic spirit, while they preferred a more direct approach of teaching. Centuries later, Nietzsche commented on the same issue: "dialectics lets you act like a tyrant; you humiliate the people you defeat."
Socratic eudaimonism and intellectualism
For Socrates, the pursuit of eudaimonia is the cause of all human action, directedly or indirectly- eudaimonia is a Greek word standing for happiness or well-being. For Socrates, virtue and knowledge are closely linked to eudaimonia- how close Socrates consider this relation, is still debatable. Some argue that Socrates though virtue, knowledge and eudaimonia are identical, another opinion holds that for Socrates virtue serves as a mean to eudaimonism (identical and sufficiency thesis respectively). Another point of debate is whether, according to Socrates, people desire actual good- or rather what they perceive as good. Socrates total rejection of acting against your impulses or beliefs (named akrasia ) has puzzled scholars. Most scholars believe that Socrates leaves no space for irrational desires, even though some claim that Socrates acknowledge the existence of irrational motivations but do not have a primary role when someone is judging what action would he take.
No-one errs willingly is the hallmark of socratic intellectualism. Socrates intellectualist, giving prominent role to virtue and knowledge. He is also a motivational intellectualist, since he believes that humans actions are guided by their cognitive power to comprehend what they desire, while diminishing the role of impulses. Socratic priority to intellect as the mean to live a good life, diminishing or placing aside irrational beliefs or passions, is the hallmark of Socratic moral philosophy. Text that support Socrates intellectual motivism, as Socrates thesis is named, are mainly the Gorgias 467c–468e (where Socrates discuss the actions of a tyrant actions that do not benefit him) and Meno 77d-78b (where Socrates explains to Meno his view that no-one wants bad things, unless he doesn't have knowledge of what is good and bad.  Socrates total rejection of akrasia (acting because of your irrational passions contrary to your knowledge or beliefs) has puzzled scholars. Most scholars believe that Socrates leaves no space for irrational desires, even though some claim that Socrates acknowledge the existence of irrational motivations but do not have a primary role when someone is judging what action would he take.
Socrates religious nonconformity challenged views of his times and his critique reshaped religious discourse for the coming centuries. It was an era when religion was quite different from today- no organized religion and sacred text with the religion intermingling with daily life of citizen who performed their religious duties mainly with sacrifices το gods. Whether Socrates have been piety, a man of religion or a provocateur atheist has been a point of debate since ancient times, his trial included impiety accusations, and the controversy haven't yet ceased.
Socrates discusses divinity and soul mostly in Alciviades, Eythyphro and Plato's Apology. In Alciviades he links human soul to divinity. He is discussing and concludes "Then this part of her resembles God, and whoever looks at this, and comes to know all that is divine, will gain thereby the best knowledge of himself." Socrates discussions on religion, are under the scope of his rationalism.
Socrates, at Eythyphro, discussing piety where reaches a revolutionary conclussion far from the age's ussual practice. Socrates deems sacrifices to Gods useless, especially that are reward-driven. Instead he calls for philosophising and pursuit of knowledge as a mean to worship gods,  The rejection of traditional forms of piety placed moral burden to ordinary Athenians- who also were his jurors at his trial. Also, Socrates reasoning was providing an wise and just Gods, a perception far from traditional religion that. It is in is Euthyphro that arises the what is now known as Euthyphro dilemma, at where he questions his interlocutor about the relation between pious and gods will or commands: Is something pious because it is the will of god, or is something the will of gods because it is pious? Implications of this puzzle leads to the rejection of the traditional greek theology; since homeric Gods used to fight each other, whilst Socrates thought that goodness, as essence, is independent from god, and gods must be pious.
Belief in Gods is affirmed by Socrates in Plato's Apology, where Socrates says to the jurors that he recognize gods more than his accusers. For Plato's Socrates, the existence of gods is taken for granded, in no of his dialogues did he examined whether gods did exist or not.  On Apology, a case for Socrates being agnostic can be made based on Socrates talk of the unknown after death., and in Phaedo (the dialogue with his students in his last day) Socrates hinds on his hopes of the immortality of the soul. 
In Xenophon's Memorabilia, Socrates constructs an argument resonating with the argument of intelligent design. He claims that since there are lot of features in the universe that exhibit "signs of forethought" (ie eyelids), a Maker should have created universe. He then rationally deduce that the Maker should be omniscient and omnipotent and also, created the universe on the advance of humankind, since we naturally have many skills other animals do not. Worthnoting is also that Socrates did speak sometimes of a single deity, other times of gods; meaning he either believed that a supreme deity was in command of other gods, or the various gods were manifestations of the single deity.
The beliefs of Socrates, as distinct from those of Plato, are difficult to discern. Little in the way of concrete evidence exists to demarcate the two. The lengthy presentation of ideas given in most of the dialogues may be the ideas of Socrates himself, but which have been subsequently deformed or changed by Plato, and some scholars think Plato so adapted the Socratic style as to make the literary character and the philosopher himself impossible to distinguish. Others argue that Socrates did have his own theories and beliefs distinct from Plato. There is a degree of controversy inherent in the identifying of what these might have been, owing to the difficulty of separating Socrates from Plato and the difficulty of interpreting even the dramatic writings concerning Socrates. Consequently, distinguishing the philosophical beliefs of Socrates from those of Plato and Xenophon has not proven easy, so it must be remembered that what is attributed to Socrates might actually be more the specific concerns of these two thinkers instead.
The matter is complicated because the historical Socrates seems to have been notorious for asking questions but not answering, claiming to lack wisdom concerning the subjects about which he questioned others.
If anything in general can be said about the philosophical beliefs of Socrates, it is that he was morally, intellectually, and politically at odds with many of his fellow Athenians. When he is on trial for heresy and corrupting the minds of the youth of Athens, he uses his method of elenchos to demonstrate to the jurors that their moral values are wrong-headed. He tells them they are concerned with their families, careers, and political responsibilities when they ought to be worried about the "welfare of their souls". Socrates' assertion that the gods had singled him out as a divine emissary seemed to provoke irritation, if not outright ridicule. Socrates also questioned the Sophistic doctrine that arete (virtue) can be taught. He liked to observe that successful fathers (such as the prominent military general Pericles) did not produce sons of their own quality. Socrates argued that moral excellence was more a matter of divine bequest than parental nurture. This belief may have contributed to his lack of anxiety about the future of his own sons.
Also, according to A. A. Long, "There should be no doubt that, despite his claim to know only that he knew nothing, Socrates had strong beliefs about the divine", and, citing Xenophon's Memorabilia, 1.4, 4.3,:
Socrates frequently says his ideas are not his own, but his teachers'. He mentions several influences: Prodicus the rhetor and Anaxagoras the philosopher. Perhaps surprisingly, Socrates claims to have been deeply influenced by two women besides his mother: he says that Diotima (cf. Plato's Symposium), a witch and priestess from Mantinea, taught him all he knows about eros, or love; and that Aspasia, the mistress of Pericles, taught him the art of rhetoric. John Burnet argued that his principal teacher was the Anaxagorean Archelaus but his ideas were as Plato described them; Eric A. Havelock, on the other hand, did not accept the view that Socrates' view was identical with that of Archelaus, in large part due to the reason of such anomalies and contradictions that have surfaced and "post-dated his death."[clarification needed]
Virtue and Knowledge
Socrates is known for disavowing knowledge, a relevant well known comment is his axiom "I know that I know nothing" which often attributed to Socrates, based on a statement in Plato's Apology; the same view is repeatedly found elsewhere in early Plato writings on Socrates. But it contradicts other statements of Socrates, when he claims he has knowledge. For example, in Plato's Apology Socrates says: "...but that to do injustice and disobey my superior, god or man, this I know to be evil and base...".(Ap. 29B6-7) Or at his debate with Callicles: "...I know well that if you will agree with me on those things which my soul believes, those things will be the very truth..."But does it reflect a truthful opinion of Socrates or is he pretending he lacks knowledge, is a matter of debate. A usual interpretation is that he is not telling the truth. According to Norman Gulley, Socrates is trying to entice his interlocutors to a discussion. On the opposite side, Irwin Terrence claims that Socrates words should be taken literally.  Vlastos after exploring text, he argues that there is enough evidence to refute both claims. Vlastos claims that for Socrates, knowledge can take two separate meanings, Knowledge-C and Knowledge-E (C stands for Certain, and E stands for Elenchus-ie the socratic method). Knowledge-C is the something unquestionable whereas Knowlegde-E is the result of his elenchus, his way of examining things. So, Socrates speaks the truth when he says he knows-C something, and he is also true when he knows-E that is evil for someone to disobey his superiors, as he claimed in Plato's Apology  Not everyone was impressed by Vlastos semanic dualism, J.H. Lesher argued that Socrates claimed in various dialogues that one word is linked to one meaning (ie in Hippias major, Meno, Laches). Lesher way out of the problem is by suggesting that Socrates claim that he had no knowledge referred to the nature of virtues, but also Socrates thought that in some cases, someone could have knowledge on some ethical propositions.
Socrates theory of virtue stands that all virtues are essentially one since they are a form of knowledge. In Protagoras Socrates makes the case for the unity of virtues using the example of courage: if someone has knowledge of the danger, he can undertake risky tasks- for example a well trained diver can swim in a deep sea cave. Aristotle comments: "...Socrates the elder thought that the end of life was knowledge of virtue, and he used to seek for the definition of justice, courage, and each of the parts of virtue, and this was a reasonable approach, since he thought that all virtues were sciences, and that as soon as one knew [for example] justice, he would be just..."
Socratic philosophy of politics
Socrates view himself as a political artist. In 'Plato's Gorgias. He tells Callimachus: "I believe that I’m one of a few Athenians – so as not to say I’m the only one, but the only one among our contemporaries – to take up the true political craft and practice the true politics. This is because the speeches I make on each occasion do not aim at gratifi cation but at what’s best.". His claim illustrates his aversion for the established democratic asseblies and procedings as votings- as Socrates didn't held any respect for politicians and rhetorians for using tricks to mislead the public. He he never run for an office or suggested any legislation. His aim was to help the City to flourish- that was his true political art. As a citizen he was lawful. He obeyed the laws, completed his military duty with fighting wars abroad. His dialogues were not about contemporary political decisions- such as the Sicilian Expedition.
Socrates was scrutinizing citizens, among them powerful members of Athenian society and brought the contradictions of their beliefs to light- Socrates believed he was doing them a favor since, since for Socrates politics was about shaping the moral landscape of the City through philosophy rather than electoral procedures. In the polarizing climate among oligarchs and democrats in ancient Greece, there is a debate where Socrates stood. While there is no clear textual evidence, one mainline holds that Socrates was leaning towards Democracy with main arguments i)disobeyed the one order the oligarchic government of Thirty Tyrants handed to him, ii)he was respecting laws and the political system of Athens which was formulated by democrats and lastly iii)he was so satisfied with -democratic- Athens, he didn't want to escape prison and death penalty. On the other hand, oligarching leaning Socrates opinions is based on i)most of his friends were oligarchists, ii)he was contemptful the of the opinion of the many and iii) in Protagoras his argumentation had some anti-democratic elements. A less mainstream argument suggests that Socrates was for democratic republicanism as he placed the City above the persons and stands in the middle ground of democrats and oligarchs.
Another suggestion is that Socrates was in line with liberalism- a political ideology formed in the Age of Enlightenment but Socrates though has some parallel lines its moral considerations. This argument is mostly based on Critias and Apology where Socrates talk about mutual benefits of the citizen who prefers to stays in the City and the city, resonates the reasoning of 17th century social contract. Also, Socrates has been seen as the first proponent of civil disobedience. Socrates strong objection to injustice, as he says in Critias: one ought never act unjustly, even to repay a wrong that has been done to oneself" along with his refusal to serve the Thirty Tyrants order to arrest Leon are suggestive of this line. But in the broader picture, Socrates counsel would be for citizens to follow orders of the state, unless, after much reflection, are deemed unjust.
There are a couple of textual passages that suggest that Socrates had a love affair with Alkiviades and other young males but also, other text suggest that Socrates did not practice pederasty, which was common in ancient Greece, and his friendship with young boys indented to improve them. In Gorgias Socrates claims he was a dual lover of Alkiviades and philosophy, and his flirtinousness is evident at Protagoras, Meno (76a–c) and Phaedrus (227c–d). But the exact nature of the relation is not clear, since Socrates was know for his self-restraining, and, as for Alkiviades, in Symposium admits that he had tried to seduce Socrates, but failed.
The Socratic theory of love is mostly deduced by Lysis where Socrates talks about love. There, at a wrestling school, Socrates talks to Lysis and his friends. They start their dialogue with investigating parental love and how their love is manifested with respect to freedom and boundaries they set for their child. Socrates concludes that if Lysis is utterly useless, nobody will love him, not even his parents. While most scholars take this text rather humorously, Gregory Vlastos suggests that it reveals Socratic doctrine on love which is an egoistic one- according to which we only love people that they are use us in some way, we want to benefit from them. Others scholars disagree with Vlastos view, either because they affirm that Socrates leaves room for non-egoistical love to spoure, or deny that Socrates is suggesting any egoistical motivation at all. A form of utility childen have for parents, as Socrates claims in Symposium is they offer the fault impression of immortality. In any case, for Socrates, love is rational.
In the Dialogues of Plato, though Socrates sometimes seems to support a mystical side, discussing reincarnation and the mystery religions, this is generally attributed to Plato. Regardless, this view of Socrates cannot be dismissed out of hand, as we cannot be sure of the differences between the views of Plato and Socrates; in addition, there seem to be some corollaries in the works of Xenophon. In the culmination of the philosophic path as discussed in Plato's Symposium, one comes to the Sea of Beauty or to the sight of "the beautiful itself" (211C); only then can one become wise. (In the Symposium, Socrates credits his speech on the philosophic path to his teacher, the priestess Diotima, who is not even sure if Socrates is capable of reaching the highest mysteries.) In the Meno, he refers to the Eleusinian Mysteries, telling Meno he would understand Socrates' answers better if only he could stay for the initiations next week. Further confusions result from the nature of these sources, insofar as the Platonic Dialogues are arguably the work of an artist-philosopher, whose meaning does not volunteer itself to the passive reader nor again the lifelong scholar. According to Olympiodorus the Younger in his Life of Plato, Plato himself "received instruction from the writers of tragedy" before taking up the study of philosophy. His works are, indeed, dialogues; Plato's choice of this, the medium of Sophocles, Euripides, and the fictions of theatre, may reflect the ever-interpretable nature of his writings, as he has been called a "dramatist of reason". What is more, the first word of nearly all Plato's works is a significant term for that respective dialogue, and is used with its many connotations in mind. Finally, the Phaedrus and the Symposium each allude to Socrates' coy delivery of philosophic truths in conversation; the Socrates of the Phaedrus goes so far as to demand such dissembling and mystery in all writing. The covertness we often find in Plato, appearing here and there couched in some enigmatic use of symbol and/or irony, may be at odds with the mysticism Plato's Socrates expounds in some other dialogues. These indirect methods may fail to satisfy some readers.
Perhaps the most interesting facet of this is Socrates' reliance on what the Greeks called his "daimōnic sign", an averting (ἀποτρεπτικός apotreptikos) inner voice Socrates heard only when he was about to make a mistake. It was this sign that prevented Socrates from entering into politics. In the Phaedrus, we are told Socrates considered this to be a form of "divine madness", the sort of insanity that is a gift from the gods. Alternately, the sign is often taken to be what we would call "intuition"; however, Socrates' characterization of the phenomenon as daimōnic may suggest that its origin is divine, mysterious, and independent of his own thoughts.
Socrates practiced and advocated divination. Xenophon was thought skilled at foretelling from sacrifices, and attributed many of his knowledges to Socrates within his writing "The Cavalry Commander".
Plato, Xenophon, and Aristotle are the main sources for the historical Socrates; however, Xenophon and Plato were students of Socrates, and they may idealize him; however, they wrote the only extended descriptions of Socrates that have come down to us in their complete form. Aristotle refers frequently, but in passing, to Socrates in his writings. Almost all of Plato's works center on Socrates. However, Plato's later works appear to be more his own philosophy put into the mouth of his mentor.
The Socratic dialogues
The Socratic Dialogues are a series of dialogues written by Plato and Xenophon in the form of discussions between Socrates and other persons of his time, or as discussions between Socrates' followers over his concepts. Plato's Phaedo is an example of this latter category. Although his Apology is a monologue delivered by Socrates, it is usually grouped with the Dialogues.
The Apology professes to be a record of the actual speech Socrates delivered in his own defence at the trial. In the Athenian jury system, an "apology" is composed of three parts: a speech, followed by a counter-assessment, then some final words. "Apology" is an anglicized transliteration, not a translation, of the Greek apologia, meaning "defense"; in this sense it is not apologetic according to our contemporary use of the term.
Plato generally does not place his own ideas in the mouth of a specific speaker; he lets ideas emerge via the Socratic Method, under the guidance of Socrates. Most of the dialogues present Socrates applying this method to some extent, but nowhere as completely as in the Euthyphro. In this dialogue, Socrates and Euthyphro go through several iterations of refining the answer to Socrates' question, "What is the pious, and what the impious?" (see Euthyphro dilemma).
In Plato's Dialogues, learning appears as a process of remembering. The soul, before its incarnation in the body, was in the realm of Ideas (very similar to the Platonic "Forms"). There, it saw things the way they truly are, rather than the pale shadows or copies we experience on earth. By a process of questioning, the soul can be brought to remember the ideas in their pure form, thus bringing wisdom.
Especially for Plato's writings referring to Socrates, it is not always clear which ideas brought forward by Socrates (or his friends) actually belonged to Socrates and which of these may have been new additions or elaborations by Plato—this is known as the Socratic Problem. Generally, the early works of Plato are considered to be close to the spirit of Socrates, whereas the later works—including Phaedo and Republic—are considered to be possibly products of Plato's elaborations.
Socrates impact was immense in philosophy after his death. Almost all philosophical currents after Socrates, traced their roots to Socrates- Plato's Academy, Aristotle Lyceum, Cynics, Stoics. And the interest on Socrates, despite the antiphatic picture it was drawn since he left no written scriptures, kept increasing till the third century CE. He was considered as the man who shifted philosophy from the study of the Nature, as it was the case by pre-Socratic philosophers, to the study the human.They all accepted socratic priority of audaimonia happiness, restrained from excesses that ultimately end in misery but since fundamental questions on the purpose of life or the nature of arete (goodness) were not given a handed, philosophical schools diverted greatly in their interpretation of Socrates.
Immediate followers of Socratism were his pupils, Euclid, Aristippus and Antisthenes who draw independent between them trajectories. For Antisthenis had a profound concept of material goods since virtue was all that mattered, a line that lead to Diogenes and the Cynics. On the opposite end, Aristippus tought for money and lived a luxurious life, after leaving Athens and returned to his home city Cyrene, founded the Cyrenaic philosophical school which was based on hedonism, living an easy life with physical pleasures (women, scents, fine clothing). His school passed to his grandson, baring the same name. There is a dialogue in Xenophon work where Aristippus claims he wants to live without wishing to rule or be ruled by others. Also, on epistemonology, Aristippus had a sceptical stance claiming that we can be certain only on feelings resonating with socratic knowledge of our ignorace. Euclid, was a contemporary of Socrates and after his trial and death, he left Athens for the nearby town of Megara, where he founded a school, named The Megarians. His theory took from pre-Socratic monism of Parmenides of What-Is. Only one thing exists according to Parmenides and that is the good Socrates as searching for, Euclid continued Socrates thought. Anyway, their doctrine is hard to reconstruct. It is clear though their impact reached Cicero and 
Stoics relied heavily by Socrates. They applied the Socratic method as a tool to avoid inconsistencies. Their moral doctrines on how to live a smooth live through wisdom and virtue, ie the crucial role of virtue for happiness, the relation between goodness and ethical excellence, all echoed Socratic though. The same time, the philosophical current of Platonism was claiming Socrates as their predecessor, in ethics and in their theory of knowledge-skeptism. Arcesilaus, the head of the Academy after Plato, reflected Socrates ingorance, and on ethics compete with Stoics on who is the continuation of Socrates . Stoics insisted on the knowledge based ethics whereas Arcesilaus relied on Socratic ignorance. Stoics replied asserting that Socratic ignorance was part of Socratic irony (though themself weren't approving irony) an argument that ultimately became the dominant narrative of Socrates in the later antiquity.
While Aristotle did held Socrates as a major philosopher, his writing didn't include him as much as some pre-Socratic philosophers and most of his followers didnt comment on Socrates. One of Aristotle pupils though unleashed an ad hominem attack to Socrates. Aristoxenus authored a book full of Socrates scandals- but was not received well by ancient critiques. Epicureans later weaponized socratic irony in their polemic against Socrates. They also attacked him for superstition, given his story with the Delphi oracle. Epicurus, the founder of epicurianism living in the 3rd and 4th century BC came across various currents claiming to be Socratic. They critique Socrates for his character and various faults, but mostly focused on his irony which deemed as inappropriate for a philosopher, anti-pedagogical and also, his socratic ignorance didn't resonate with their criteria of truths.
Socratic thought find its way to Islamic Middle East alongside those of Aristotle and Stoicism. Plato's works on Socrates, as well as other ancient Greek literature, were translated to Arabic and prominent early Muslim scholars such as Al-Kindi, Jabir ibn Hayyan, Muʿtazila. For Muslim scholars, Socrates was hailed and admired for combining his ethics with his life stance, maybe because of resembling Prophet's life. Socratic doctrines were alter to match Islamic faith, Socrates, according to Muslim scholars made arguments for monotheism, for a caring god in particular, or of the temporality of this world and about reward in our next life. His influence on the Arabic world carried to modern days.
Socrates influence grew in Western Europe during the fourteenth century as Plato's dialogues were made available in Latin by Marsilio Ficino and Xenophon's Socratic writings were translated by Basilios Bessarion. Voltaire even went so far as to write a satirical play about the trial of Socrates. There were a number of paintings about his life including Socrates Tears Alcibiades from the Embrace of Sensual Pleasure by Jean-Baptiste Regnault and The Death of Socrates by Jacques-Louis David in the later 18th century.
To this day, different versions of the Socratic method are still used in classroom and law school discourse to expose underlying issues in both subject and the speaker. He has been recognized with accolades ranging from frequent mentions in pop culture (such as the movie Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure and a Greek rock band called Socrates Drank the Conium) to numerous busts in academic institutions in recognition of his contribution to education.
Over the past century, numerous plays about Socrates have also focused on Socrates' life and influence. One of the most recent has been Socrates on Trial, a play based on Aristophanes' Clouds and Plato's Apology, Crito, and Phaedo, all adapted for modern performance.
Evaluation of and reaction to Socrates has been undertaken by both historians and philosophers from the time of his death to the present day with a multitude of conclusions and perspectives. Although he was not directly prosecuted for his connection to Critias, leader of the Spartan-backed Thirty Tyrants, and "showed considerable personal courage in refusing to submit to [them]", he was seen by some as a figure who mentored oligarchs who became abusive tyrants, and undermined Athenian democracy. The Sophistic movement that he railed at in life survived him, but by the 3rd century BC, was rapidly overtaken by the many philosophical schools of thought that Socrates influenced.
Socrates' death is considered iconic, and his status as a martyr of philosophy overshadows most contemporary and posthumous criticism. However, Xenophon mentions Socrates' "arrogance" and that he was "an expert in the art of pimping" or "self-presentation". Lactantius wrote: "Socrates therefore had something of human wisdom ... But many of his actions are not only undeserving of praise, but also most deserving of censure, in which things he most resembled those of his own class. Out of these I will select one which may be judged of by all. Socrates used this well-known proverb: 'That which is above us is nothing to us.' ... The same man swore by a dog and a goose ... Oh buffoon (as Zeno the Epicurean says), senseless, abandoned, desperate man! If he wished to scoff at religion—madman, if he did this seriously, so as to esteem a most base animal as God! For who can dare to find fault with the superstitions of the Egyptians, when Socrates confirmed them at Athens by his authority? But was it not a mark of consummate vanity, that before his death he asked his friends to sacrifice for him a cock which he had vowed to Aesculapius? He evidently feared lest he should be put upon his trial before Rhadamanthus, the judge, by Aesculapius on account of the vow. I should consider him most mad if he had died under the influence of disease. But since he did this in his sound mind, he who thinks that he was wise is himself of unsound mind." Direct criticism of Socrates the man almost disappears after his death, but there is a noticeable preference for Plato or Aristotle over the elements of Socratic philosophy distinct from those of his students, even into the Middle Ages.
Some modern scholarship holds that, with so much of his own thought obscured and possibly altered by Plato, it is impossible to gain a clear picture of Socrates amid all the contradictory evidence. That both Cynicism and Stoicism, which carried heavy influence from Socratic thought, were unlike or even contrary to Platonism further illustrates this. The ambiguity and lack of reliability serve as the modern basis of criticism—that it is nearly impossible to know the real Socrates. Some controversy also exists about Socrates' attitude towards homosexuality and as to whether or not he believed in the Olympian gods, was monotheistic, or held some other religious viewpoint. However, it is still commonly taught and held with little exception that Socrates is the progenitor of subsequent Western philosophy, to the point that philosophers before him are referred to as pre-Socratic.
- Socrates is played by Peter Ustinov in the 1966 film Barefoot in Athens.
- Socrates is played by Victor Buono in the 1971 film The Trial of Socrates.
- Socrates is played by Tony Steedman in the 1989 cult classic Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure.
- Kraut, Richard (16 August 2017). "Socrates". Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. Archived from the original on 20 October 2017. Retrieved 20 November 2017.
- Jones, Daniel; Roach, Peter, James Hartman and Jane Setter, eds. Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary. 17th edition. Cambridge UP, 2006.
- Easterling, P. E. (1997). The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy. Cambridge University Press. p. 352. ISBN 978-0-521-42351-9. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 19 November 2017.
- Smith, Nicholas D.; Woodruff, Paul (2000). Reason and Religion in Socratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press. p. 154. ISBN 978-0-19-535092-0. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 19 November 2017.
469 or 468 (corresponding to the fourth year of the 77th Olympiad), according to Apollodorus...But the year of Socrates's birth is probably only an inference from...Plato [who] has Socrates casually describe himself as having lived seventy years.
- James Rachels, The Legacy of Socrates: Essays in Moral Philosophy Archived 1 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine Columbia University Press, 2007 ISBN 0-231-13844-X Accessed 24 November 2017
- Gregory Vlastos (1991). Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cornell University Press. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-8014-9787-2.
- Moral Philosophy – The Discovery of Ethics : Socrates Archived 18 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine Jacques Maritain Center Accessed 24 November 2017
- Peter Singer (1985) – Encyclopædia Britannica Archived 20 December 2016 at the Wayback Machine Chicago, 1985, pp. 627–648 Accessed 24 November 2017
- Anne Rooney – The Story of Philosophy: From Ancient Greeks to Great Thinkers of Modern Times Archived 1 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine (search page) Archived 1 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine Arcturus Publishing, 2014 ISBN 1-78212-995-2 Accessed 24 November 2017
- Charles H. Kahn (1998) – Ethics Archived 22 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine – p. 42 Archived 22 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Cambridge University Press. 1998 ISBN 0-521-38832-5 Accessed 22 December 2017
- Stern, T (2013) – Philosophy and Theatre: An Introduction Archived 22 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine – ix Archived 22 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine Routledge 2013 ISBN 1-134-57591-2 Accessed 22 December 2017
- Kofman, Sarah (1998). Socrates: Fictions of a Philosopher. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-8014-3551-5.
- Garner., Dwight (14 March 2014). "Who's More Famous Than Jesus?". NY Times. Archived from the original on 1 April 2021.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 5-7; Dorion 2011, pp. 1-2; May 2000, p. 9; Waterfield 2013, p. 1.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 13-15.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 15.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 15-16 & 28.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 15-16.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 18.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 20-23.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 25-26.
- Dorion 2011, p. 1-3.
- Dorion 2011, pp. 2-3.
- Dorion 2011, p. 5.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 29-31; Dorion 2011, p. 6.
- Guthrie 1972.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 29-33; Waterfield 2013, p. 3-4.
- May 2000, p. 20; Dorion 2011, p. 6.
- May 2000, p. 20; Waterfield 2013, p. 3-4.
- May 2000, p. 20; Dorion 2011, p. 7; Kahn 1998, p. xvii; Waterfield 2013, p. 1.
- Dorion 2011, pp. 7-9.
- May 2000, pp. 19-20.
- Waterfield 2013, pp. 10-11.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 35-36.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 38.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 38-39.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 39-41.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 39-51.
- Waterfield 2013, p. 5.
- Vlastos 1991, p. 52; Kahn 1998, pp. 1-2.
- Morrison, D.R. (2011). The Cambridge Companion to Socrates (p. xiv). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83342-4.
- Nails, D. Socrates:Socrates' strangeness. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Archived from the original on 7 May 2015. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
- Soccio, Douglas J. (2009). Archetypes of Wisdom: An Introduction to Philosophy. Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-0-495-60382-5.
- Gilead, Amilhud (1994). The Platonic Odyssey: A Philosophical-literary Inquiry Into the Phaedo. Rodopi. ISBN 978-9-051-83746-9.
- El Murr, Dimitri (27 July 2016). "Socrates". Oxford Bibliographies. doi:10.1093/obo/9780195389661-0211. ISBN 978-0-19-538966-1.
- Peter J. Ahrensdorf – The Death of Socrates and the Life of Philosophy: An Interpretation of Plato's Phaedo p. 17 Archived 15 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine SUNY Press, 1995 ISBN 0-7914-2634-3 Accessed 23 November 2017
- CH Kahn, Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form (p. 75), Cambridge University Press, 1998, ISBN 0-521-64830-0.
- Cohen, M., Philosophical Tales: Being an Alternative History Revealing the Characters, the Plots, and the Hidden Scenes That Make Up the True Story of Philosophy, John Wiley & Sons, 2008, p. 5, ISBN 1-4051-4037-2.
- Socrates Archived 1 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine Behind the Name Accessed 28 November 2017
- Google translation – Greek for Socrates Archived 5 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine Accessed 28 November 2017
- D Nails Archived 27 March 2015 at the Wayback Machine, Agora, Academy, and the Conduct of Philosophy (p. 9), Springer, 1995, ISBN 0-7923-3543-0.
- Ahbel-Rappe, S., Socrates: A Guide for the Perplexed (p. 2 and footnote 10 on pp. 157–58), A&C Black, 2009.
- Bett, R. (11 May 2009). A Companion to Socrates. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 299–30. ISBN 978-1-4051-9260-6. (A translation of one fragment reads: "But from them the sculptor, blatherer on the lawful, turned away. Spellbinder of the Greeks, who made them precise in language. Sneerer trained by rhetoroticians, sub-Attic ironist.")
- Lieber, F. Encyclopedia Americana (pp. 266–67), published 1832 (original from Oxford University).
- CS. Celenza (2001), Angelo Poliziano's Lamia: Text, Translation, and Introductory Studies (note 34), Brill, 2010, ISBN 90-04-18590-9.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 2.
- Ober 2011, pp. 159-160; Ahbel-Rappe 2011, p. 1; Guthrie 1972, p. 58; Dorion 2011, p. 12.
- Nails 2020, A Chronology of the historical Socrates in the context of Athenian history and the dramatic dates of Plato’s dialogues; Guthrie 1972, pp. 1-2.
- Ober 2011, pp. 160-161.
- Ober 2011, pp. 161-162.
- Ober 2011, p. 161; Vasiliou 2013, p. 33.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 65.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 59.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 65; Ober 2011, pp. 167-171.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 78.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 66-67.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 69.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 73-75; Nails 2020, Socrates’s strangeness.
- O'Connor 2011, pp. 211; Obdrzalek 2013, p. 210-211; Nails 2020, Socrates’s strangeness.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 89-94; Nails 2020, Socrates’s strangeness.
- May 2000, p. 30.
- May 2000, pp. 47-48.
- May 2000, p. 41.
- Nails 2020, A Chronology of the historical Socrates.
- May 2000, p. 31.
- May 2000, p. 33-39.
- May 2000, pp. 41-42.
- May 2000, p. 42.
- May 2000, p. 43.
- May 2000, pp. 45-46.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 65-66.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 64-65.
- Ralkowski 2013, p. 302.
- Ralkowski 2013, pp. 303-304.
- Ralkowski 2013, pp. 306-307.
- Ralkowski 2013, pp. 307-308.
- Ralkowski 2013, pp. 319-322.
- Ralkowski 2013, pp. 323.
- Benson 2011, p. 179; Wolfsdorf 2013, pp. 34-35.
- Wolfsdorf 2013, p. 34:Other are Charmides, Crito, Euthydemus, Euthyphro, Hippias Major, Hippias Minor, Ion, Laches, Lysis, Protagoras. Benson (2011) also adds parts of Meno p.179
- Benson 2011, p. 182-184; Wolfsdorf 2013, pp. 34-35.
- Benson 2011, p. 184.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 125-127.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 128-129.
- Benson 2011, p. 179,185-193.
- Benson 2011, p. 185; Wolfsdorf 2013, pp. 34-35; Ambury 2020, The Elenchus: Socrates the Refuter.
- Benson 2011, p. 185; Wolfsdorf 2013, p. 44; Ambury 2020, The Elenchus: Socrates the Refuter.
- Benson 2011, p. 185.
- Ambury 2020, The Elenchus: Socrates the Refuter: Benson (2011) names in a note scholars that are of constructivist and non-constructivism approach: "Among those “constructivists” willing to do so are Brickhouse and Smith 1994 , ch. 6.1; Burnet 1924 , pp. 136–137; McPherran 1985 ; Rabinowitz 1958 ; Reeve 1989 , ch. 1.10; Taylor 1982 ; and Vlastos 1991 , ch. 6. Those who do not think a Socratic account of piety is implied by the text (“anticonstructivists”) include Allen 1970 , pp. 6–9, 67; and Grote 1865 , pp. 437–57. Beckman 1979 , ch. 2.1; Calef 1995 ; and Versényi 1982" p=118
- Benson 2013, p. 136.
- Benson 2013, p. 137-139.
- Benson 2013, p. 139-141.
- Benson 2013, pp. 143-145; Bett 2011, p. 228.
- Benson 2013, pp. 143-145, 147; Bett 2011, p. 229.
- Benson 2013, p. 145.
- Vlastos 1994, p. 67.
- Benson 2013, p. 155.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 222; Bett 2011, p. 215; McPartland 2013, p. 94-95.
- McPartland 2013, p. 98.
- McPartland 2013, p. 99.
- McPartland 2013, p. 108-109.
- McPartland 2013, p. 109.
- McPartland 2013, p. 117.
- McPartland 2013, p. 118-119.
- McPartland 2013, p. 135.
- Lane 2011, p. 239.
- Vasiliou 2013, p. 20.
- Vasiliou 2013, p. 24; Lane 2011, p. 239.
- Lane 2011, p. 249-251.
- Lane 2011, pp. 241-242.
- Lane 2011, p. 243.
- Vasiliou 2013, pp. 28-29.
- Lane 2011, p. 244.
- Penner 2011, pp. 259-261; Brickhouse & Smith 2013, p. 185; Vlastos 1991, p. 203.
- Reshotko 2013, p. 159.
- Brickhouse & Smith 2013, pp. 190-191.
- Segvic 2006, p. 190.
- Brickhouse & Smith 2013, p. 185.
- Segvic 2006, p. 171.
- Brickhouse & Smith 2013, p. 185-186.
- McPherran 2013, p. 257.
- McPherran 2013, pp. 259-260.
- McPherran 2013, pp. 257-258.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 151-153.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 153.
- McPherran 2013, pp. 260-262.
- McPherran 2013, p. 265.
- McPherran 2013, p. 266.
- McPherran 2013, p. 263; McPherran 2011, p. 117; 1ps:See also note 30, p. McPherran for further reference sfnm error: no target: CITEREF1ps:See_also_note_30,_p._McPherran_for_further_reference (help).
- McPherran 2011, p. 117.
- McPherran 2013, pp. 272-273.
- McPherran 2013, pp. 270-271.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 157-158.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 159-172.
- McPherran 2013, p. 272.
- Cohn, Dorrit (2001). "Does Socrates Speak for Plato? Reflections on an Open Question". New Literary History. 32 (3): 485–500. doi:10.1353/nlh.2001.0030. ISSN 1080-661X. S2CID 170977228.
- Plato, Republic 336c and 337a, Theaetetus 150c, Apology 23a; Xenophon, Memorabilia 4.4.9; Aristotle, Sophistical Refutations 183b7.
- Long, AA., in Ahbel-Rappe, S.; Kamtekar, R. (2009). A Companion to Socrates. John Wiley & Sons. p. 59. ISBN 978-1-4051-9260-6.
- Plato, Menexenus 235e
- Anton, John P. (1983). ""The Socratic Problem: Some Second Thoughts" by Eric A. Havelock". Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy Volume Two. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. pp. 147–73. ISBN 978-0-87395-623-9.
- Vlastos 1985, p. 1.
- Vlastos 1985, pp. 6-7.
- Vlastos 1985, p. 1-2; Lesher 1987, p. 275.
- Lesher 1987, p. 276.
- Lesher 1987, p. 276; Vasiliou 2013, p. 28.
- Lesher 1987, p. 278; McPartland 2013, p. 123.
- McPartland 2013, pp. 123-124.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 131; Ahbel-Rappe 2011, pp. 183-184.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 131.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 131; Ahbel-Rappe & Kamtekar 2009, p. 72 sfnm error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFAhbel-RappeKamtekar2009 (help).
- Griswold 2011; Johnson 2013, p. 234.
- Johnson 2013, p. 234.
- Griswold 2011, p. 334.
- Johnson 2013, p. 235.
- Johnson 2013, pp. 236-237.
- Johnson 2013, p. 238.
- Johnson 2013, pp. 238-240.
- Johnson 2013, pp. 241-242.
- Johnson 2013, pp. 255-256.
- Obdrzalek 2013, pp. 210-211.
- Obdrzalek 2013, pp. 211-212; Rudebusch 2009, p. 187.
- Obdrzalek 2013, pp. 214-215.
- Obdrzalek 2013, p. 212.
- Obdrzalek 2013, p. 231.
- Obdrzalek 2013, p. 230.
- McPherran, M.L. (1998). The Religion of Socrates. Penn State Press. p. 268.
- Olympiodorus the Younger, Life of Plato, in The Works of Plato: A New and Literal Version Chiefly from the Text of Stallbaum, p. 234, Bohm, 1854.
- J. Mikalson (June 2010). Greek Popular Religion in Greek Philosophy. OUP Oxford. p. 123. ISBN 978-0-19-161467-5. Archived from the original on 29 April 2016. Retrieved 16 December 2015.
- Khan, C.H. (1998). Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge University Press.
- Morrison, D.R. (2011). "1". The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 165; Long 2011, p. 355.
- Long 2011, pp. 355-356.
- Long 2011, p. 358.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 165-166.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 169.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 170.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 170-174.
- Guthrie 1972, p. 175-177.
- Guthrie 1972, pp. 179-183.
- Long 2011, p. 362.
- Long 2011, pp. 362-264.
- Long 2011, pp. 364-365.
- Long 2011, p. 367.
- Long 2011, pp. 368-369.
- Long 2011, p. 374.
- Campos-Daroca 2019, p. 240; Lane 2011, p. 244; Long 2011, p. 370.
- Alon 2009, pp. 317-318.
- Alon 2009, pp. 325-326.
- Alon 2009, pp. 332.
- Ahbel-Rappe, S.; Kamtekar, R. (2009). A Companion to Socrates. John Wiley & Sons. pp. xix–xx.
- Wilson, E.R. (2007). The Death of Socrates: Hero, Villain, Chatterbox, Saint. Profile Books. pp. 61–62.
- Danzig, G. (2010). Apologizing for Socrates: How Plato and Xenophon Created Our Socrates. Lexington Books. pp. 66–67.
- Institutiones Divinae, b. 3, c. 20.
- W. K. C. Guthrie, Socrates Archived 28 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine, Cambridge University Press, 1971, p. 70.
- A.A. Long "How Does Socrates' Divine Sign Communicate with Him?", Chapter 5 in: A Companion to Socrates Archived 28 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine, John Wiley & Sons, 2009, p. 63.
- "Barefoot in Athens". 11 November 1966. Archived from the original on 1 June 2019. Retrieved 10 November 2019.
- "The Trial of Socrates". 1971. Retrieved 10 November 2019.
- "Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure". De Laurentiis Entertainment Group (DEG). 17 February 1989. Archived from the original on 10 November 2019. Retrieved 10 November 2019.
- Brun, Jean (1978). Socrate (sixth ed.). Presses universitaires de France. pp. 39–40. ISBN 978-2-13-035620-2. (in French)
- Ong, Walter (2002). Orality and Literacy. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-28129-4.
- Kagan, Donald. The Fall of the Athenian Empire. First. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1987.
- Pausanias, Description of Greece. W.H.S. Jones (translator). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd. (1918). Vol. 1. Books I–II: ISBN 0-674-99104-4. Vol. 4. Books VIII.22–X: ISBN 0-674-99328-4.
- Thucydides; The Peloponnesian War. London, J.M. Dent; New York, E.P. Dutton. 1910.
- Bernas, Richard, cond. Socrate. By Erik Satie. LTM/Boutique, 2006
- Bruell, C (1994). "On Plato's Political Philosophy". Review of Politics. 56 (2): 261–82. doi:10.1017/s003467050001843x.
- Bruell, C. (1999). On the Socratic Education: An Introduction to the Shorter Platonic Dialogues, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
- Grube, G.M.A. (2002). "Plato, Five Dialogues". Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
- Hanson, V.D. (2001). "Socrates Dies at Delium, 424 B.C.", What If? 2, Robert Cowley, editor, G.P. Putnam's Sons, NY.
- Irvine, Andrew David (2008). Socrates on Trial: A play based on Aristophanes's Clouds and Plato's Apology, Crito, and Phaedo, adapted for modern performance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-0-8020-9783-5 (cloth); ISBN 978-0-8020-9538-1 (paper); ISBN 978-1-4426-9254-1 (e-pub)
- Kamtekar, Rachana (2004). Plato's Euthyphro, Apology, and Crito: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-3325-7.
- Kierkegaard, Søren (1968). The Concept of Irony: with Constant Reference to Socrates. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-20111-9.
- Luce, J.V. (1992). An Introduction to Greek Philosophy, Thames & Hudson, NY.
- Maritain, J. (1930, 1991). Introduction to Philosophy, Christian Classics, Inc., Westminster, MD.
- Robinson, R (1953). Plato's Earlier Dialectic. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-824777-7. Ch. 2: "Elenchus", Ch. 3: "Elenchus: Direct and Indirect"
- Taylor, C.C.W., Hare, R.M. & Barnes, J. (1998). Greek Philosophers – Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, Oxford University Press, NY.
- Taylor, C.C.W. (2001). Socrates: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ahbel-Rappe, Sara; Kamtekar, Rachana (2009). A Companion to Socrates. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-4051-5458-1.
- Ahbel-Rappe, Sara (2011). Socrates: A Guide for the Perplexed. A&C Black. ISBN 978-0-8264-3325-1.
- Alon, Ilai (2009). "Socrates in Arabic Philosophy". In Sara Ahbel-Rappe (ed.). A Companion to Socrates. Rachana Kamtekar. Wiley. pp. 313–326. ISBN 978-1-4051-5458-1.
- Ambury, James M. (2020). "Socrates". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
- Benson, Hung H. (2011). "Socratic Method". In Donald R. Morrison (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press. pp. 179–200. ISBN 978-0-521-83342-4.
- Benson, Hung H. (3 January 2013). "The priority of definition". In Nicholas D. Smith (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. John Bussanich. A&C Black. pp. 136–155. ISBN 978-1-4411-1284-2.
- Bett, Richard (2011). "Socratic Ignorance". In Donald R. Morrison (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press. pp. 215–236. ISBN 978-0-521-83342-4.
- Brickhouse, Thomas C.; Smith, Nicholas D. (3 January 2013). "Socratic Moral Psychology". In Nicholas D. Smith (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. John Bussanich. A&C Black. pp. 185–209. ISBN 978-1-4411-1284-2.
- Campos-Daroca, F. Javier (15 May 2019). "Epicurus and the Epicureans on Socrates and the Socratics". In Kyriakos N. Demetriou (ed.). Brill's Companion to the Reception of Socrates. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-39675-3.
- Dorion, Louis André (2011). "The Rise and Fall of the Socratic Problem". In Donald R. Morrison (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–23. ISBN 978-0-521-83342-4.
- Guthrie, W. K. C. (1972). A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 3, The Fifth Century Enlightenment, Part 2, Socrates. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-09667-6.
- Griswold, Charles L. (2011). "Socrates' Political Philosophy". In Donald R. Morrison (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press. pp. 333–352. ISBN 978-0-521-83342-4.
- Johnson, Curtis (3 January 2013). "Socrates' political philosophy". In Nicholas D. Smith (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. John Bussanich. A&C Black. pp. 233–256. ISBN 978-1-4411-1284-2.
- Kahn, Charles H. (4 June 1998). Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-64830-1.
- Lane, Josiah (2011). "Socrates and Democratic Athens". In Donald R. Morrison (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press. pp. 138–178. ISBN 978-0-521-83342-4.
- Lesher, J. H. (James H.) (1987). "Socrates' Disavowal of Knowledge". Journal of the History of Philosophy. Project Muse. 25 (2): 275–288. doi:10.1353/hph.1987.0033. ISSN 1538-4586. S2CID 171007876.
- Long, A.A. (2011). "Socrates in Later Greek Philosophy". In Donald R. Morrison (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press. pp. 355–379. ISBN 978-0-521-83342-4.
- May, Hope (2000). On Socrates. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. ISBN 978-0-534-57604-2.
- McPherran, Mark L. (2011). "Socratic religion". In Donald R. Morrison (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press. pp. 111–127. ISBN 978-0-521-83342-4.
- McPherran, Mark L. (3 January 2013). "Socratic theology and piety". In Nicholas D. Smith (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. John Bussanich. A&C Black. pp. 257–277. ISBN 978-1-4411-1284-2.
- McPartland, Melissa (3 January 2013). "Reconsidering Socratic Irony". In Nicholas D. Smith (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. John Bussanich. A&C Black. pp. 237–259. ISBN 978-1-4411-1284-2.
- Nails, Debra (2020). Edward N. Zalta (ed.). "Socrates". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Ober, Josiah (2011). "Socrates and Democratic Athens". In Donald R. Morrison (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press. pp. 138–178. ISBN 978-0-521-83342-4.
- O'Connor, David K. (2011). "Xenophon and the Enviable Life of Socrates". In Donald R. Morrison (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press. pp. 48–74. ISBN 978-0-521-83342-4.
- Obdrzalek, Suzanne (3 January 2013). "Socrates on Love". In Nicholas D. Smith (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. John Bussanich. A&C Black. pp. 210–232. ISBN 978-1-4411-1284-2.
- Penner, Terry (2011). "Socratic Ethics and the Socratic Psychology of Action: A Philosophical Framework". In Donald R. Morrison (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press. pp. 260–292. ISBN 978-0-521-83342-4.
- Ralkowski, Mark (3 January 2013). "The politics of impiety why was Socrates prosecuted by the Athenian democracy ?". In Nicholas D. Smith (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. John Bussanich. A&C Black. pp. 301–327. ISBN 978-1-4411-1284-2.
- Reshotko, Naomi (3 January 2013). "Socratic eudaimonism". In Nicholas D. Smith (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. John Bussanich. A&C Black. pp. 136–155. ISBN 978-1-4411-1284-2.
- Rudebusch, George (2009). "Socratic Love". In Sara Ahbel-Rappe (ed.). A Companion to Socrates. Rachana Kamtekar. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-4051-5458-1.
- Segvic, Heda (2006). "No One Errs Willingly: The Meaning of Socratic Intellectualism". In Sara Ahbel-Rappe (ed.). A Companion to Socrates. Rachana Kamtekar. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-4051-5458-1.
- Vasiliou, Iakovos (3 January 2013). "Socratic irony". In Nicholas D. Smith (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. John Bussanich. A&C Black. pp. 20–33. ISBN 978-1-4411-1284-2.
- Vlastos, Gregory (1985). "Socrates' Disavowal of Knowledge". The Philosophical Quarterly. Oxford University Press (OUP). 35 (138): 1–31. doi:10.2307/2219545. ISSN 0031-8094. JSTOR 2219545.
- Vlastos, Gregory (1991). Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-9787-2.
- Vlastos, Gregory (1994). Socratic Studies. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-44735-5.
- Waterfield, Robin (3 January 2013). "Quest for the historical Socrates". In Nicholas D. Smith (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. John Bussanich. A&C Black. pp. 1–19. ISBN 978-1-4411-1284-2.
- Wolfsdorf, David (3 January 2013). "Quest for the historical Socrates". In Nicholas D. Smith (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. John Bussanich. A&C Black. pp. 34–67. ISBN 978-1-4411-1284-2.
|Library resources about |
- Socrates at Curlie
- Socrates at the Indiana Philosophy Ontology Project
- Socrates on In Our Time at the BBC
- Greek Philosophy: Socrates
- Original Fresque of Socrates in Archaeological Museum of Ephesus
- Socrates Narrates Plato's The Republic
- Project Gutenberg e-texts on Socrates, amongst others:
- A free audiobook of the Socratic dialogue Euthyphro at LibriVox
- Socrates and the daimonion. Ancient testimonia and extensive bibliography on the sign of Socrates