Jump to content

User talk:Ryulong: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 103: Line 103:
Nah, I was only wanting to restrict the moves... what I done did that, didn't it? /[[User:Wangi|wangi]] 00:06, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Nah, I was only wanting to restrict the moves... what I done did that, didn't it? /[[User:Wangi|wangi]] 00:06, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
:Argh, scratch that. I'm an idiot. Thanks for fixing that!! /[[User:Wangi|wangi]] 00:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
:Argh, scratch that. I'm an idiot. Thanks for fixing that!! /[[User:Wangi|wangi]] 00:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

==Ryulong - Check the Other Magazine Articles==
Dude, you must hate me for no reason. Just randomly look through your magazine category at all of the sales media kits that have survived your gistappo wrath!! I can't believe the extent of "selective enforcement" going on in here. I am turning this over to my attorney who is used to dealing with these kinds of things. How about an email or something before you delete. How about do unto others Ryulong? If you have a brain cell you can go and see for yourself what you allow in here. Far worse than what I had posted. I tried nice with you. Now I will try my attorney.

Revision as of 03:26, 27 January 2007

Server time:
August 2024
Wednesday
13:15 UTC
Archives
  1. February 2006 – June 2006
  2. July 2006
  3. August 2006
  4. September 2006
  5. October 2006
  6. November 2006
  7. December 2006
  8. January 2007

When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion. --Ryūlóng


Blocking of "spambot/openproxy"

Regarding your block of 66.197.217.245 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), et al. for being spambot/open proxies: I appreciate the speed at which you block these IPs which are being exploited by people using automated software like this one to spam. However, after you block one, please put {{subst:openproxy}} on its user talk, so that if the IP allocation ever changes and its no longer a proxy, the next occupant won't be scratching their heads why they're blocked (explaining in the block log is a little terse IMO). I don't think it will slow you down a single bit, will it? :) Flyingtoaster1337 05:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okie dokie—Ryūlóng () 05:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All Hail Ryulong, the Administrator!

Congratulations, Ryulong, on your sucessful request for adminship! We think you'll do a great job as an admin. Keep it up! -- Altiris Exeunt 06:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no. he does not deserve hailing. why would u delete the pie versus cake entry? and u did it three times. duech bag. u should have all ur "awards" taken away. yeah edit this queer. i hope u have fun deleting all my posts, ive got ur profile booked marked. plus im going to tell post ur url in every single RVB fan group/forum/site. best of wishes 69.234.148.81 02:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)The_Right_Way[reply]

thanks

just wanted to say thanks in regards to 58.10.102.143, it was getting frustrating to need to continuously revert. Lord of Haha 06:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Ryulong!

Hi, thank you for unblocking me, I just want you to know, That I wrote a very large part of that Article yesturday, and some of the information has changed, and then you protected the article, how am I supposed to change it? There is wrong information, and I would like to change it please. Thank you very much MCRluvr 06:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I protected the article because of User:MCRluvsME which you apparently created. You can request that the article be editted by using {{editprotected}} on the talk page, which will notify another admin to change the article.—Ryūlóng () 06:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not create MCRluvsME, I know who did, but it wasn't me, she created it at the same time that I did.

--MCRluvr 06:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right, sorry. Names are too similar. I will block both and unprotect the article for now.—Ryūlóng () 06:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, that is one of my former friends, and once she found out what part of the article I wrote, she went and deleted it all, I called her and she admitted she did it, I really, really appreciate this! --MCRluvr 06:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats

Just heard of your recent "promotion." It's amazing how much one can miss when one isn't paying attention to it (I've had my head stuck in Michigan radio stuff for the last two weeks). Congrats on the promotion -- may you only abuse your powers if it helps me. ;-) JPG-GR 06:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Semiprotection

I had semi-portected my usertalk since I was under constant attack from Cplot et al. It doesn't seem to be working at this time. Maybe it needs to be reset at semi-protection and if you don't mind, I would appreciate it.--MONGO 07:18, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cplot is using sleepers, now. The latest one was made five days ago.—Ryūlóng () 07:19, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see, I hadn't noticed that...good eye and thanks.--MONGO 07:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

How are the new tools helping out? — Deckiller 10:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that User:Mathmo is trying to avoid being busted for a WP:3RR by editting while logged out as evidenced here. I haven't reverted the last edit as I have no desire to further this edit war. He clearly doesn't care about WP:FAIR (or possibly other policies, based on his contribs). Just bringing it to someone's attention. JPG-GR 20:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have since reverted the page and requested semi-protection. JPG-GR 20:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Cfds

Cfd nominations are per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 January 25#Actors by series.

Best wishes,

Xdamrtalk 23:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blast it!
<bangs head on table, again, again, again, again....>
Ok, give me a few minutes break and I'll see what I can do.
Xdamrtalk 23:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's what I just noticed :)
Xdamrtalk 23:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong protection

Nah, I was only wanting to restrict the moves... what I done did that, didn't it? /wangi 00:06, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Argh, scratch that. I'm an idiot. Thanks for fixing that!! /wangi 00:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ryulong - Check the Other Magazine Articles

Dude, you must hate me for no reason. Just randomly look through your magazine category at all of the sales media kits that have survived your gistappo wrath!! I can't believe the extent of "selective enforcement" going on in here. I am turning this over to my attorney who is used to dealing with these kinds of things. How about an email or something before you delete. How about do unto others Ryulong? If you have a brain cell you can go and see for yourself what you allow in here. Far worse than what I had posted. I tried nice with you. Now I will try my attorney.