User talk:Worldsendart

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diana Butler OAM (August 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Jack Frost was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not for promotion. CSD G11.

Jack Frost (talk) 11:02, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Diana Butler OAM

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Diana Butler OAM, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jack Frost (talk) 11:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 12:34, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

I have removed all the material you added to Care for Africa. Putting aside the extreme promotional nature of the material, which is in and of itself impermissible per Wikipedia's policies, much of it was copyright infringement. Most of the infringing material came from the organization's website, and some from UNICEF's website. You have been warned above about about your conflict of interest. I am reinforcing that warning. Do not edit the article directly for any reason. If you do, you risk being blocked. If you want to make changes to the article, you must propose them on the article Talk page. In addition, before you make any more edits, you must make a declaration on your userpage of your conflict of interest.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bbb23 in 2007, I was working for Matilda Media under my friend, the late Alex Hartman. We had a shared Wikipedia account, which I think was "Matilda". However, that account was still active as of last month, so... maybe not? I have since been informed that sharing a Wikipedia account is forbidden, and I will never do that again. Worldsendart (talk) 01:54, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi there BBb23,

Thank you for your edits and clarifications. I have a BA majoring in history and have been a journalist with Associated Press, Agence France Presse and other agencies and am staunchly aware of the implications of unbiased referencing. I refute your claims that the creation of this page is "extreme promotional nature". Diana Butler is a public figure. Please see the page for Hugh Evans (Humanitarian) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Evans_(humanitarian) as an example of the genre being followed here. I have previously worked with Mr Evans and am friends with his mother, I have made some contributions on that page too under an historic name based on information I have seen in the public sphere that was not referenced on the page. I do not believe that having professional knowledge and using multiple sources precludes a writer from creating or updating pages on public figures as a 'conflict of interest' under Wikipedia's terms.

My conflict of interest is that I volunteer my services to ensure there is accurate public information about Care for Africa and other organisations made available across sources in line with other publicly available information.

Please reconsider this deletion and provide feedback on the parts you believe to be inappropriate and we can work together to resolve this rather than outright deleting it.

Best, Worldsendart Worldsendart (talk) 01:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

What was the name of the account you used to edit Hugh Evans (humanitarian)?--Bbb23 (talk) 02:13, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

I believe it was Matilda or Matilda Media? Worldsendart (talk) 02:37, 5 August 2021 (UTC) worldsendart

Is User:Matilda you? That's the only Matilda who edited the article. I'm logging off shortly, so I won't be able to complete this conversation until tomorrow.--Bbb23 (talk) 03:18, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

I just deleted the mess you added. First, as I told you before, copyright infringement is impermissible, and some of what you proposed was again infringing. If you do that again, regardless of anything else, I will block you. Second, the rest of it was the same promotional material as before; you put some of it in long quotations to try to avoid copyright infringement. Wikipedia is not a WP:QUOTEFARM. Finally, you did not answer my question about your other account. Please answer it before you do anything else.--Bbb23 (talk) 07:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 04:06, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bbb23 in 2007, I was working for Matilda Media under my friend, the late Alex Hartman. We had a shared Wikipedia account, which I think was "Matilda". However, that account was still active as of last month, so... maybe not? I have since been informed that sharing a Wikipedia account is forbidden, and I will never do that again.