Jump to content

Talk:Nick Zedd: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
It seems that sadly wikipedia is turning into a space for every idiot to sale his wares...
It seems that sadly wikipedia is turning into a space for every idiot to sale his wares...
[[User:195.134.69.213|195.134.69.213]] 05:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
[[User:195.134.69.213|195.134.69.213]] 05:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

What's sad about Wikipedia is that one disgruntled crank can impugn the integrity of a true artist just because he/she (of course, the crank remains anonymous) doesn't understand or agree with the edgy content of the artist. "The Theory of Xenomorphosis" may be a bit "out there," but there are dozens of [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Theory+of+Xenomorphosis%22&btnG=Search : references to it on Google]. As for whether Nick Zedd is notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia, the question is ridiculous. He may not be a household name, but that's the point of encyclopedias. He's a major figure in underground and cult cinema, with [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Nick+Zedd%22&btnG=Search : tens of thousands of Google] citations and nearly [http://imdb.com/name/nm0954143/ : two dozen films to his directorial credit on IMDB].

Revision as of 03:18, 29 January 2007

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

"The Theory of Xenomorphosis explains the concept of the Union of Opposites in relation to audiovisual expression and the nature of external stimulae as an invasion of the nervous system,"

how such utter twaddle can be part of an encyclopedia is beyond me...

"as well as methods of achieving transcendence from consensus reality through cognitive dissonance and heightened states of awareness attainable through persistence of vision. Film as a method of applied magic is addressed in these essays."

such crap should not even be put down in writing...

It seems that sadly wikipedia is turning into a space for every idiot to sale his wares... 195.134.69.213 05:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's sad about Wikipedia is that one disgruntled crank can impugn the integrity of a true artist just because he/she (of course, the crank remains anonymous) doesn't understand or agree with the edgy content of the artist. "The Theory of Xenomorphosis" may be a bit "out there," but there are dozens of : references to it on Google. As for whether Nick Zedd is notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia, the question is ridiculous. He may not be a household name, but that's the point of encyclopedias. He's a major figure in underground and cult cinema, with : tens of thousands of Google citations and nearly : two dozen films to his directorial credit on IMDB.