Talk:Nick Zedd: Difference between revisions
Rickbruner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Rickbruner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[User:195.134.69.213|195.134.69.213]] 05:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC) |
[[User:195.134.69.213|195.134.69.213]] 05:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
What's sad about Wikipedia is that one disgruntled crank can impugn the integrity of a true artist just because he/she (of course, the crank remains anonymous) doesn't understand or agree with the edgy content of the artist. "The Theory of Xenomorphosis" may be a bit "out there," but there are dozens of [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Theory+of+Xenomorphosis%22&btnG=Search : references to it on Google]. As for whether Nick Zedd is notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia, the question is ridiculous. He may not be a household name, but that's the point of encyclopedias. He's a major figure in underground and cult cinema, with [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Nick+Zedd%22&btnG=Search : tens of thousands of Google] citations and nearly [http://imdb.com/name/nm0954143/ : two dozen films to his directorial credit on IMDB]. |
What's sad about Wikipedia is that one disgruntled crank can impugn the integrity of a true artist just because he/she (of course, the crank remains anonymous) doesn't understand or agree with the edgy content of the artist. "The Theory of Xenomorphosis" may be a bit "out there," but there are dozens of [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Theory+of+Xenomorphosis%22&btnG=Search : references to it on Google]. As for whether Nick Zedd is notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia, the question is ridiculous. He may not be a household name, but that's the point of encyclopedias. He's a major figure in underground and cult cinema, with [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Nick+Zedd%22&btnG=Search : tens of thousands of Google] citations and nearly [http://imdb.com/name/nm0954143/ : two dozen films to his directorial credit on IMDB]. -- [[Rickbruner|rickbruner]], January 28, 2007 |
Revision as of 03:20, 29 January 2007
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
Biography Unassessed | |||||||
|
"The Theory of Xenomorphosis explains the concept of the Union of Opposites in relation to audiovisual expression and the nature of external stimulae as an invasion of the nervous system,"
how such utter twaddle can be part of an encyclopedia is beyond me...
"as well as methods of achieving transcendence from consensus reality through cognitive dissonance and heightened states of awareness attainable through persistence of vision. Film as a method of applied magic is addressed in these essays."
such crap should not even be put down in writing...
It seems that sadly wikipedia is turning into a space for every idiot to sale his wares... 195.134.69.213 05:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
What's sad about Wikipedia is that one disgruntled crank can impugn the integrity of a true artist just because he/she (of course, the crank remains anonymous) doesn't understand or agree with the edgy content of the artist. "The Theory of Xenomorphosis" may be a bit "out there," but there are dozens of : references to it on Google. As for whether Nick Zedd is notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia, the question is ridiculous. He may not be a household name, but that's the point of encyclopedias. He's a major figure in underground and cult cinema, with : tens of thousands of Google citations and nearly : two dozen films to his directorial credit on IMDB. -- rickbruner, January 28, 2007