User talk:ATS: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Isa Briones: complete screw-up Tag: Reverted |
Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
::::{{ping|Jc37}} you literally could not be interpeting this more poorly; the locus is ''last stable version'', not ''first version''—and the article would never have been granted GA status unless it was stable. No disrespect intended, but I believe we need to consult a sysop with more experience. Perhaps {{u|Nikkimaria}} would like to weigh in? —[[User:ATS|ATS]] ([[User talk:ATS#top|talk]]) 05:03, 30 August 2021 (UTC) |
::::{{ping|Jc37}} you literally could not be interpeting this more poorly; the locus is ''last stable version'', not ''first version''—and the article would never have been granted GA status unless it was stable. No disrespect intended, but I believe we need to consult a sysop with more experience. Perhaps {{u|Nikkimaria}} would like to weigh in? —[[User:ATS|ATS]] ([[User talk:ATS#top|talk]]) 05:03, 30 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
:::::You are conflating my words to try to mean something I did not say. I am disinterested in a debate. If you wish to contest the close, please feel free to take it before the community at [[WP:AN]]. - <b>[[User:Jc37|jc37]]</b> 05:08, 30 August 2021 (UTC) |
:::::You are conflating my words to try to mean something I did not say. I am disinterested in a debate. If you wish to contest the close, please feel free to take it before the community at [[WP:AN]]. - <b>[[User:Jc37|jc37]]</b> 05:08, 30 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
:::::{{ping|Jc37}} I do not contest the close; I contest the "reversion" to the first unstable edit. Revert yourself or I will. —[[User:ATS|ATS]] ([[User talk:ATS#top|talk]]) 05:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC) |
::::::{{ping|Jc37}} I do not contest the close; I contest the "reversion" to the first unstable edit. Revert yourself or I will. —[[User:ATS|ATS]] ([[User talk:ATS#top|talk]]) 05:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 05:14, 30 August 2021
|
Archives
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 | Please don't template me! Everybody fucks up, and this editor (since 2007) finds newbie warning templates impersonal and inappropriate. If I need a reminder, please take a moment to write me in your own words. Thanks. |
Isa Briones
So, GNL means nothing? The fact that it was "actor" to begin with before someone decided to change it means nothing? Weak consensus my arse—the original text should be kept in that event given that, by your own admission, "actress should not be auto-reverted"? Did you not just violate this by "reverting" to the revert? —ATS (talk) 03:18, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- First, I'm going to try to WP:AGF and treat this merely as a request for clarification, and try to respond to your questions.
- GNL is an essay. I gave weight to many things in the closure, as I noted.
- The first edit] used "actress". And in looking over the edit history of the page, I think one could pretty easily come to the conclusion that you contributed to the article's lack of stability concerning actor/actress. - jc37 03:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Jc37: speaking of AGF ... that was wholly unnecessary. You suggest I contributed to the article's instability by using its creation edit? As opposed to, say, when GA status was awarded to a stable article that wasn't changed in proven bad faith for another 11 days? Bollocks. —ATS (talk) 04:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- To clarify: In response to your assertion "The fact that it was "actor" to begin with before someone decided to change it means nothing?", I merely pointed out what the first "before" was. (It wasn't ..."'actor' to begin with...".) - jc37 04:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Jc37: you literally could not be interpeting this more poorly; the locus is last stable version, not first version—and the article would never have been granted GA status unless it was stable. No disrespect intended, but I believe we need to consult a sysop with more experience. Perhaps Nikkimaria would like to weigh in? —ATS (talk) 05:03, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- You are conflating my words to try to mean something I did not say. I am disinterested in a debate. If you wish to contest the close, please feel free to take it before the community at WP:AN. - jc37 05:08, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Jc37: I do not contest the close; I contest the "reversion" to the first unstable edit. Revert yourself or I will. —ATS (talk) 05:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- You are conflating my words to try to mean something I did not say. I am disinterested in a debate. If you wish to contest the close, please feel free to take it before the community at WP:AN. - jc37 05:08, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Jc37: you literally could not be interpeting this more poorly; the locus is last stable version, not first version—and the article would never have been granted GA status unless it was stable. No disrespect intended, but I believe we need to consult a sysop with more experience. Perhaps Nikkimaria would like to weigh in? —ATS (talk) 05:03, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- To clarify: In response to your assertion "The fact that it was "actor" to begin with before someone decided to change it means nothing?", I merely pointed out what the first "before" was. (It wasn't ..."'actor' to begin with...".) - jc37 04:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Jc37: speaking of AGF ... that was wholly unnecessary. You suggest I contributed to the article's instability by using its creation edit? As opposed to, say, when GA status was awarded to a stable article that wasn't changed in proven bad faith for another 11 days? Bollocks. —ATS (talk) 04:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)