Jump to content

User talk:Cptchipjew: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Decline unblock
Cptchipjew (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:

{|
{|
|-
|-
Line 13: Line 12:


{{unblock reviewed|1=I voted in a VfD and apparently that's a bannable offense? Please unblock me. I have quality knowledge to contribute.|decline=It's a shame that you weren't doing so. -- [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] 03:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|1=I voted in a VfD and apparently that's a bannable offense? Please unblock me. I have quality knowledge to contribute.|decline=It's a shame that you weren't doing so. -- [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] 03:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)}}

{{unblock}} Just do it. Stop the death of free speech ;) wink

Revision as of 21:46, 31 January 2007

You have been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating policy against personal attacks,threats. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.

Note to sysops: Unblocking yourself should almost never be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator.

--Shanel § 19:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop that

This message which you have repeatedly posted, sure looks to me like it contains a personal attack. We don't tolerate this nonsense here. Please stop. Friday (talk) 20:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cptchipjew (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I voted in a VfD and apparently that's a bannable offense? Please unblock me. I have quality knowledge to contribute.

Decline reason:

It's a shame that you weren't doing so. -- Yamla 03:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Cptchipjew (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Just do it. Stop the death of free speech ;) wink