Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Dratwa: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Jim Dratwa: K |
Sam Markanda (talk | contribs) →Jim Dratwa: K |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Delete'''. Looks far [[WP:TOOSOON]] for [[WP:NPROF]], and I didn't find reviews for [[WP:NAUTHOR]]. I'm seeing signs that may point to [[WP:UPE]] in the page history. [[User:Russ Woodroofe|Russ Woodroofe]] ([[User talk:Russ Woodroofe|talk]]) 07:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Looks far [[WP:TOOSOON]] for [[WP:NPROF]], and I didn't find reviews for [[WP:NAUTHOR]]. I'm seeing signs that may point to [[WP:UPE]] in the page history. [[User:Russ Woodroofe|Russ Woodroofe]] ([[User talk:Russ Woodroofe|talk]]) 07:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. Not to be disregarded: subject is also a game author, a boardgame designer. Game authors rarely do 'only that'. Now even if on the other fronts the notability might be [[WP:Too soon]], as a Board_game_designer the notability is right up there. The page should not be deleted. Please [[WP:EDITATAFD]] and add in the set of games this author designed (see [[Bill Dixon (game designer)]] for an example). [[User:Uliberty|Uliberty]] ([[User talk:Uliberty|talk]]) 13:49, 13 October 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. Not to be disregarded: subject is also a game author, a boardgame designer. Game authors rarely do 'only that'. Now even if on the other fronts the notability might be [[WP:Too soon]], as a Board_game_designer the notability is right up there. The page should not be deleted. Please [[WP:EDITATAFD]] and add in the set of games this author designed (see [[Bill Dixon (game designer)]] for an example). [[User:Uliberty|Uliberty]] ([[User talk:Uliberty|talk]]) 13:49, 13 October 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''keep'''. Secondary sources are there. I created the page initially and it has since been substantially improved by others. The process is ongoing, there is no need to preclude it. [[User:Sam Markanda|Sam Markanda]] ([[User talk:Sam Markanda|talk]]) 14:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:34, 13 October 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jim Dratwa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is almost entirely sourced to primary sources, either the subject himself, or institutions that he works for or with. There are almost no independent secondary sources tht discuss the subject. The WP:GNG is not met, nor is WP:NACADEMIC; there is no indication that the subject's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline. Vexations (talk) 21:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 21:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:Too soon for WP:Prof. A few decent cites on GS, but not enough yet. Reads like a vanity page. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC).
- Delete. Looks far WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF, and I didn't find reviews for WP:NAUTHOR. I'm seeing signs that may point to WP:UPE in the page history. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 07:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Not to be disregarded: subject is also a game author, a boardgame designer. Game authors rarely do 'only that'. Now even if on the other fronts the notability might be WP:Too soon, as a Board_game_designer the notability is right up there. The page should not be deleted. Please WP:EDITATAFD and add in the set of games this author designed (see Bill Dixon (game designer) for an example). Uliberty (talk) 13:49, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- keep. Secondary sources are there. I created the page initially and it has since been substantially improved by others. The process is ongoing, there is no need to preclude it. Sam Markanda (talk) 14:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)