Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WorldCreaterFighter

WorldCreaterFighter

WorldCreaterFighter (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WorldCreaterFighter/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/WorldCreaterFighter.

23 November 2021

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

• RobertoY20 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 2001:4BC9:911:EE16:7145:5476:354C:9D9A (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 2001:4bc9:902:7dc6:b4e8:940e:827c:4a08 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 2001:4bc9:911:3da3:cc9c:43a9:ba31:4315 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 46.125.250.27 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 46.125.250.29 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 213.162.73.85 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 213.162.73.217 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 213.142.97.112 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 2001:4bc9:924:6356:e52b:2951:ff6b:600c (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

2001:4BC9:911:EE16:7145:5476:354C:9D9A sticks to RobertoY20's contributions in Genetic history of East Asians. 4BC9:911:EE16:7145:5476:354C:9D9A's diff1, 4BC9:911:EE16:7145:5476:354C:9D9A's diff2, RobertoY20's diff etc. These IPv6 IPs are adept at editing, despite having no previous contributions. And the three IPv6 IPs look very similar and are all Austrian IPs. Most of the Confirmed and suspected IP socks of World Create Fighter were Austrian IPs. RobertoY20 has the same editorial form as WorldCreaterFighter's habitual behaviors. RobertoY20 and WorldCreaterFighter believe that East Asians originated only in Southeast Asia, and tend to favor a pro-Southeast Asian/Austronesian alignment such as for the origins of the Jōmon and Ainu peoples. diff1, diff2, diff3, diff4, diff5, diff6, diff7, diff8, diff9, diff10, diff11, diff12, diff13, etc. Meanwhile, 46.125.250.27, 46.125.250.29, 213.162.73.85, 213.162.73.217, 213.142.97.112, these very similar Austrian IPs have recently contributed to Genetic history of East Asians and Jōmon people. 46.125.250.27's diff, 46.125.250.29's diff, 213.142.97.112's diff etc. these IPs are very similar to World Creator Fighter's IPs. SsSsSs0909 (talk) 15:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Additional evidence: 2001:4bc9:924:6356:e52b:2951:ff6b:600c, a new Austrian IP to repeat the same argument appeared on the article's talk page. diff--SsSsSs0909 (talk) 09:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Not sure if I should make a comment here, but something does seem really off about the filer in question. The filer was created about 2 weeks ago (November 10th, to be accurate), and this is suspicious behavior. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

@DarkMatterMan4500: Although not written in this report, I already reported copyright violation files (even arbitrarily distorted) uploaded by HunanZH, who turned out to be WorldCreaterFighter's sock account on Wikimedia. And the IPs used in Wikipedia for the HunanZH's files were all Austrian IPs. diff1, diff2, diff3, diff4 etc.--SsSsSs0909 (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Okay, I guess? DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 14:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

I signed up to report obvious copyright violations.--SsSsSs0909 (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

I respond as an accused user here: The user which created this report is currently in an edit dispute with me (I obviously use an IP address which changes after reconnecting with the internet (mobile phone)). The user made unconstructive changes by removing large parts of content and replacing it with hypotheses raised in an 2011 paper. I already explained that this is a violation of WP:Weight and WP:OR, but the user was not interested in my arguments, so I started a discussion with quoting inline citations. Than we had some exchanges, but the user does not seem to understand the problem of his edits and so on, so he started to make claims that I use socks, while I am simply editing with my IP. I suggest everyone to read this discussion here to get a better overview. I already requested third user opinion and I also explained the user his misinterpretations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Genetic_history_of_East_Asians#Southern/Northern_route_models_recent_unconstructive_edits

I hope this dispute can be settled.2001:4BC9:900:48C9:AD0A:75E7:4138:B9AA (talk) 11:07, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

And btw, were do I edit or support anything about Austronesians or Jomon? The dispute here is about if ancestors of East Asians used a northern or southern route (see discussion linked above). I pointed that these kind of edits are unconstructive and have misleading edit summaries:. (Replacing content with copy paste sentences of a 2011 study.) It is kind of suspicious that the accusing user knows more about this sock puppet thing than me, and I ask myself how a new user find all these things out of nowhere?2001:4BC9:900:48C9:AD0A:75E7:4138:B9AA (talk) 11:14, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

•  1.75x amplified ultimate quack of ultimate destiny I have so far chosen to ignore this new report, even if this is actually an obvious case, because the drama (bordering on troll fests) surrounding these SPIs is just as disruptive or even more disruptive than the actual edits made by the LTA. In the past year or so, I have chosen simply to quietly revert or cleanup their mess, or in few cases went to RPP. But now that I am even pinged[1], I have to throw in these 2 cents of mine. Being canvassed by an LTA is a bad experience. –Austronesier (talk) 11:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

I am informing you all, that I, the accused IP, created an account to respond and create a SPI against three users, one is SsSsSs0909. This account can be deactivated or blocked after wards, or I may instead rename it and stop editing with IP, but only logged in. Please see this report and the mentioned evidence regarding SsSsSs0909 :. I am 2001:4bc9:920:f3f4:1da:3ee3:8537:c81b.ToRespond (talk) 07:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I recommend checking the filer.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

---