User talk:RobertoY20

Welcome!

Hi Roberto Sandrocko! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 20:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

baekje

Russian-American linguist Alexander Vovin believes that the ruling class of Baekje, the kingdom of Korea, is a Koreanic speaker from the north (Manchuria). Vovin believes that the Baekje elite used Koreanic from the beginning. You need to refer to Alexander Vovin's paper for further explanation on this part. The indigenous peoples of the Baekje region (formerly the territory of Korea and Mahan) used a mixture of Korean and Japanese, and mostly Japanese. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.36.134.215 (talk) 08:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

error

territory of Korea (X)

Jin state (Korea) (O) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.36.134.215 (talk) 21:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tungusic pov

Hey, why you push that the so called "Altaic-like" people was close to Tungusic or Oroqen? The study only says Altaic like and not mentions Tungusic. I will correct this misleading pov pushing.195.123.241.29 (talk) 18:42, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username , Roberto Sandrocko, appears to be too similar to the username of another Wikipedia user. You are welcome to create a new account with a username that is easily distinguishable, or ask for a request in changing username by:

1. Typing {{unblock-un|user=your new username here|reason=your reason here}} on your user talk page.

2. You will have 24 hours to fill in an unblock request for a change of username before you get re-blocked.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

RobertoY20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

RobertoY20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

changing my username

Accept reason:

I have renamed and unblocked your account. Welcome back. PhilKnight (talk) 10:43, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jōmon people

Hi! I have added a cleanup-tag to the genetics section of Jōmon people, with an edit summary: much of this is valuable and up-to-date information about good scholarship, but will the general reader profit from this kind of presentation? Plus, this relies heavily on unpruned primary sources. Using a more recent Schmidt & Seguchi-style source (is there any?) would be much more helpful for our readers.

You have built up quite some conent in the recent months, and before continuing in the same mold, you might consider trying to read the section from the viewpoint of a complete outsider with a general interest in Jomon history. Maybe there is a way to make things more digestible with less emphasis on citing every primary study that's available, and ideally relying more on secondary sources which can take from us the burden of evaluating due weight (not every primary study is of equal importance and quality). –Austronesier (talk) 12:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry for the late response. I agree that it would be useful to simplify and make it more digestible. I will take a look and try to make it more readable for a complete outsider of this topic. Best regards.RobertoY20 (talk) 08:08, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:WorldCreaterFighter per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WorldCreaterFighter. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]