Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orchomen: Difference between revisions
Add |
Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Nope, that account is not one of mine. Look harder {{yo|Amaury}}. I'm just fucking with you for old times sake. He's collateral damage. [[Special:Contributions/2001:8F8:1F21:86C:2:1:393B:AA85|2001:8F8:1F21:86C:2:1:393B:AA85]] ([[User talk:2001:8F8:1F21:86C:2:1:393B:AA85|talk]]) 18:14, 6 December 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:14, 6 December 2021
Orchomen
- Orchomen (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
01 December 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- reverting to a Lirae22 edit
- reverting to a Lirae22 edit
- restoring talk page comments by Ingvario
- A bunch of edits hounding Comradeka, who was in a dispute with Ingvario and publicly called out Lirae22 as a sock: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], and [7]
Orchomen appears to back editing from one IPv4 (Special:Contributions/31.219.85.253) and a dynamic set of IPv6s in the Special:Contributions/2001:8F8:1F33:3909:2:1:14D:66DC/32 range. There are definitely some recent edits by unrelated users in that 32 range, but I don't know if it's possible to capture the problematic edits in any tighter range. Firefangledfeathers 04:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging User:Comradeka, who's getting the worst of it right now. Firefangledfeathers 04:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Sro23: understood. What can I do to help whac? Is it worth it to list individual IPv6s or /64s here? Firefangledfeathers 03:13, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- I have a feeling you're going to have a difficult time finding an admin comfortable with blocking that wide a range. We usually just end up playing whac a mole with this one. Sro23 (talk) 03:09, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- At this point, you'll get more of an immediate response at AIV. Next time he shows up you can report straight to AIV along with a link to this SPI. Sro23 (talk) 03:17, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
06 December 2021
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- CreecregofLife (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
IPs geolocate to the UAE, Orchomen's favorite place. Amaury • 18:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Nope, that account is not one of mine. Look harder @Amaury:. I'm just fucking with you for old times sake. He's collateral damage. 2001:8F8:1F21:86C:2:1:393B:AA85 (talk) 18:14, 6 December 2021 (UTC)