Jump to content

User talk:FMSky: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1061991331 by Jonathon Phelps (talk) ???
Tags: Undo Reverted
m Undid revision 1061991403 by FMSky (talk)
Tags: Undo Reverted
Line 32: Line 32:


No, you’ve literally followed my edits on [[Brandon Bernard]], [[Ted Bundy]], [[Nate Woods]], and many others. And yes, my edits aren’t helpful even though I’ve added tons of info that only you have an issue with because facts don’t fit with your narratives. Get a life, dude. [[User:TheXuitts|TheXuitts]] ([[User talk:TheXuitts|talk]]) 06:58, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
No, you’ve literally followed my edits on [[Brandon Bernard]], [[Ted Bundy]], [[Nate Woods]], and many others. And yes, my edits aren’t helpful even though I’ve added tons of info that only you have an issue with because facts don’t fit with your narratives. Get a life, dude. [[User:TheXuitts|TheXuitts]] ([[User talk:TheXuitts|talk]]) 06:58, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

== Your recent contributions to [[Ant McPartlin]] ==

[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Ant McPartlin]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> [[User:Jonathon Phelps|Jonathon Phelps]] ([[User talk:Jonathon Phelps|talk]]) 12:45, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:46, 25 December 2021

Gothic II infobox

I'm confused. In the Template:Infobox video game page, primary sources (which would include the game itself) are mentioned, and nowhere does it mention needing secondary sources for credits, and the only notable need for that was for pre-release. Using the cite video game after every name for a game with a credits sequence would be redundant and I haven't seen any other video game infobox do that. What I'm confused on as well is that you left the designer and composer, who are not mentioned in the article via secondary sources, meaning they were also taken from the in-game credits.Rakewater (talk) 11:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rakewater: you seem to be correct, i reverted my edit --FMSky (talk) 02:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Luis Garavito page.

A substantial amount of information has been removed in your revision regarding Luis Alfredo Garavito Cubillos' childhood infobox. These things retain crucial information in regard to Garavito's early childhood suffering in the context of him being name-called, abused, and bullied by his father and schoolmates. It also particularly notes his early life insecurities, and blossoming personality disturbances. In contrast with other pages relating to serial killers such as Dennis Nilsen and Edmund Kemper, it describes their personal feelings and outlook on things at that particular time in their life. Unless "duplicate content" refers to something completely different than what I (a new member) see it as, why does it necessitate removal when it is completely consistent and crucial to the subject? Thank you for your substantial changes.

- EDIT: Nevermind, hahah. Ignore this rambling; thank you once more for tweaking the article to a much more refined state. :)

Edd Wesson (talk) 12:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, i noticed that some stuff was mentioned twice or was even contradicting (like the part about his mother), so i merged it and deleted some parts to make more sense --FMSky (talk) 16:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent tidy-ups to conspiracy theorist articles

Hi, I noticed your improvements to Sacha Stone and Mark Steele (conspiracy theorist). Thank you for your attention to detail. One of these days I'd also like to get Draft:Geza Tarjanyi over the line. He's a person of very similar qualities to the others. Salimfadhley (talk) 19:54, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spielberg and Scorsese regarding One Eyed Jacks

Hello, FMSky, my source for mentioning Scorsese's and Spielberg's intense reverence for One Eyed Jacks is a 14-minute speech Scorsese gave at the New York Film Festival in 2016 when introducing their restoration of the film. I was there and saw him speak at length about it, which is readily available on YouTube and also embedded into an article about the speech in IndieWire by Mark Burger titled "Martin Scorsese Analyzes Marlon Brando in 15-Minute ‘One-Eyed Jacks’ Discussion — Watch." Whenever I get time, I'll work on inserting a citation for that into the Brando article. Thanks for your kind attention and letting me know. I hope I manage to get that done before it recedes into the mists of my memory. Thanks again, FMSky. The Final Edict (talk) 18:51, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you literally follow my edit history?

It seems as though you specifically attempt to undo or misconstrue edits I make on various pages conveniently after I edit. TheXuitts (talk) 04:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i look over your edits on the XXXTentacion page, cause most of them aren't helpful FMSky (talk) 06:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, you’ve literally followed my edits on Brandon Bernard, Ted Bundy, Nate Woods, and many others. And yes, my edits aren’t helpful even though I’ve added tons of info that only you have an issue with because facts don’t fit with your narratives. Get a life, dude. TheXuitts (talk) 06:58, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent contributions to Ant McPartlin

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ant McPartlin. Jonathon Phelps (talk) 12:45, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]