Jump to content

User talk:Kyo Aston: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kyo Aston (talk | contribs)
→‎Unblock request: new section
Kyo Aston (talk | contribs)
Line 34: Line 34:


{{unblock|Please review my edits - they were all as part of a counter-vandalism effort, hindered by having to respond to the many unfounded grievances and complaints seen on my talk page. This is a particularly clear cut case of editors banding together to harass and disparage someone who is trying to protect the site from vandals.}} [[User:Kyo Aston|Kyo Aston]] ([[User talk:Kyo Aston#top|talk]]) 12:27, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|Please review my edits - they were all as part of a counter-vandalism effort, hindered by having to respond to the many unfounded grievances and complaints seen on my talk page. This is a particularly clear cut case of editors banding together to harass and disparage someone who is trying to protect the site from vandals.}} [[User:Kyo Aston|Kyo Aston]] ([[User talk:Kyo Aston#top|talk]]) 12:27, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
:I would also recommend that [[user:GiantSnowman|GiantSnowman]] receive a short punitive block (e.g. ~2/3 days) to allow them to cool off. [[User:Kyo Aston|Kyo Aston]] ([[User talk:Kyo Aston#top|talk]]) 12:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:28, 29 December 2021

Stop please

Please stop your reverts which make no sense and are unexplained Dr Salvus 12:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My edits are reverting vandalism. Kyo Aston (talk) 12:06, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Information icon Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to user talk:q28. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Q28 (talk) 12:12, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read the above very carefully. M.Bitton (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Duly noted, and duly ignored. There was never any doubt that I was going to lose the popularity contest in being a recent changes patroller, and I'm certainly not going to fold just because some disgruntled editors can't handle being put in their place. Kyo Aston (talk) 12:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyo Aston: (talk) I can assure you that indeed there is a protein named Sonic hedgehog as can be seen by following the link. Please retract the vandalism warning from my talk page. Thank you, Facts707 (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Calling b.s on that one I'm afraid. So no, I will not retract the vandalism warning. Kyo Aston (talk) 12:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, from Portugal,

false vandalism accusation, been here for 15 years and i take great pride in fighting vandalism in all its forms. No worries, now the player's height is listed at 1,88 with a source that reads 1,83!

Happy 2022 --193.137.135.2 (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check again... Kyo Aston (talk) 12:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check what, if you please? --193.137.135.2 (talk) 12:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GiantSnowman 12:26, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Kyo Aston (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please review my edits - they were all as part of a counter-vandalism effort, hindered by having to respond to the many unfounded grievances and complaints seen on my talk page. This is a particularly clear cut case of editors banding together to harass and disparage someone who is trying to protect the site from vandals.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Please review my edits - they were all as part of a counter-vandalism effort, hindered by having to respond to the many unfounded grievances and complaints seen on my talk page. This is a particularly clear cut case of editors banding together to harass and disparage someone who is trying to protect the site from vandals. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please review my edits - they were all as part of a counter-vandalism effort, hindered by having to respond to the many unfounded grievances and complaints seen on my talk page. This is a particularly clear cut case of editors banding together to harass and disparage someone who is trying to protect the site from vandals. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please review my edits - they were all as part of a counter-vandalism effort, hindered by having to respond to the many unfounded grievances and complaints seen on my talk page. This is a particularly clear cut case of editors banding together to harass and disparage someone who is trying to protect the site from vandals. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Kyo Aston (talk) 12:27, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would also recommend that GiantSnowman receive a short punitive block (e.g. ~2/3 days) to allow them to cool off. Kyo Aston (talk) 12:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]