User talk:WightElk: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:15, 31 December 2021

This is WightElk's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Navalny 35 (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Each individual is notable and the action might be notable, but I do not see a single source cited here that actually refers to the group as the "Navalny 35" or anything similar. Also, for a potentially contentious page, significantly undercited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Navalny 35 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Navalny 35, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 23:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WightElk! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 23:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WightElk! Thank you for starting the translation of the Russian article ru:Список Навального. During translation, you have omitted some references, and I believe that this was the reason of receiving a response that "they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". I introduced some of these references. Of course, it would be nice to have references in English, but already now the Russian references should be enough. Please try to find more references, better in English. — Ace111 (talk) 17:15, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 |}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
 [[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]
+Hi WightElk! Thank you for starting the translation of the Russian article [[:ru:Список Навального]]. During translation, you have omitted some references, and I believe that this was the reason of receiving a response that "they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|''reliable'']], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|''secondary'']] sources that are ''[[Wikipedia:Identifying and using independent sources|independent]]'' of the subject". I introduced some of these references. Of course, it would be nice to have references in English, but already now the Russian references should be enough. Please try to find more references, better in English. — [[User:Ace111|Ace111]] ([[User talk:Ace111|talk]]) 17:15, 31 December 2021 (UTC)