Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris-Zaga: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:01, 19 January 2022

Kris-Zaga

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Princess of Ara 17:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Princess of Ara 17:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - promotional article by UPE editor. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Article not promotional, keep to encourage new editors, still being developed and similar to many (over 64k) ^[1] underdeveloped, not notable and or promotional articles in english wikipedia,(nigeria). Most of the cited articles below does not meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. example are but not limited to ^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8]^[9]^[10]^[11]^[12]^[13]^[14]^[15]^[16]^[17]^[18]^[19] Aspaman (talk) 20:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly see WP:ATA, Princess of Ara 20:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ orphaned
^ Chime_Tsnare
^ Mr_2Kay
^ DJ_Big_N
^ DJ_Caise
^ Idahams
^ Mary_Uranta
^ Bola_Are
^ Dunni_Olanrewaju
^ A-Q
^ Afro_Candy
^ Ali_Jita
^ Dice_Ailes
^ Emeka_Nwokedi
^ /May7ven
^ Mr_Real
^ Mr_Raw
^ Ruby_Gyang
^ Yung6ix

Princess of Ara Thank you; As you recommend references i read and learn more, so much to learn and understand plus school works, This is my first ever article and i want to be a long time contributor here and i am pleading or begging everyone making a contribution to see this deletion process as a last resort, to give a chance for improvement, some subjects may not be notable when pages are created, as time goes on they might meet notability requirements and this is how many orphaned articles that i have seen on english wikipedia gets improved. I understand this process now, please do me a big favour to keep the article. Aspaman — Preceding undated comment added 17:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. The argument that we keep articles because someone might become notable later is ludicrous as policy explicitly states that we should delete in these situations. There is a reason why reviewers declined a draft on this subject three times. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GPL93 -- what is the main reason why all the articles referenced above and over 64k orphaned articles still remained and not being considered for deletion? i've been studying these articles referenced; from the standards you mentioned, none of them meets notability. the recommendation for deletion is BIAS. please explain further and try to look at the referenced articles thanks. Also reviewers declined the draft for this article because it was not well written, secondly, copyright issues and these are good reasons. That is also to show you that this is a learning process; i believe an experienced editor may write it better and it be accepted just like the rest as referenced above. I am interested in understanding why some articles without notability get to stay and some that have been placed on others permanent watch list gets to be deleted.

[1] rphaned

[2] Chime_Tsnare

[3] Mr_2Kay

[4] DJ_Big_N

[5] DJ_Caise

[6] Idahams

[7] Mary_Uranta

[8] Bola_Are

[9] Dunni_Olanrewaju

[10] A-Q

[11] Afro_Candy

[12] Ali_Jita

[13] Dice_Ailes

[14] Emeka_Nwokedi

[15] /May7ven

[16] Mr_Real

[17] Mr_Raw

[18] Ruby_Gyang

[19] Yung6ix

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 :: [[User:Princess of Ara|Princess of Ara]] Thank you; As you recommend references i read and learn more, so much to learn and understand plus school works, This is my first ever article and i want to be a long time contributor here and i am pleading or begging everyone making a contribution to see this deletion process as a last resort, to give a chance for improvement, some subjects may not be notable when pages are created, as time goes on they might meet notability requirements and this is how many orphaned articles that i have seen on english wikipedia gets improved. I understand this process now, please do me a big favour to keep the article. [[User:Aspaman|Aspaman]]  <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 17:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 *'''Delete''' fails [[WP:MUSICBIO]] or [[WP:GNG]]. The argument that we keep articles because someone might become notable later is ludicrous as [[WP:TOOSOON|policy explicitly states that we should delete in these situations]]. There is a reason why reviewers declined a draft on this subject three times. Best, [[User:GPL93|GPL93]] ([[User_talk:GPL93|talk]]) 23:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
+::[[User:GPL93|GPL93]] -- what is the main reason why all the articles referenced above and over 64k orphaned articles still remained and not being considered for deletion? i've been studying these articles referenced; from the standards you mentioned, none of them meets notability. the recommendation for deletion is BIAS.  please explain further and try to look at the referenced articles thanks. Also reviewers declined the draft for this article because it was not well written, secondly, copyright issues and these are good reasons. That is also to show you that this is a learning process; i believe an experienced editor may write it better and it be accepted just like the rest as referenced above. I am interested in understanding why some articles without notability get to stay and some that have been placed on others permanent watch list gets to be deleted.