Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kepler-1972: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Dating comment by Nguyễn Trí Nguyên - ""
Nwhyte (talk | contribs)
Line 9: Line 9:
*'''Redirect''' to [[List of exoplanets discovered in 2022]] for now. I could find no evidence of notability. [[User:Praemonitus|Praemonitus]] ([[User talk:Praemonitus|talk]]) 15:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to [[List of exoplanets discovered in 2022]] for now. I could find no evidence of notability. [[User:Praemonitus|Praemonitus]] ([[User talk:Praemonitus|talk]]) 15:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
**We still can wait until NASA reveals a system, is it a option can you at least remove this page, unless it proved they exist by Publishers, i only found one: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11459 - [[User:Nguyễn_Trí_Nguyên|TriNguyen12348]] 10:56 January, 30th, 2022 <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 15:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
**We still can wait until NASA reveals a system, is it a option can you at least remove this page, unless it proved they exist by Publishers, i only found one: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11459 - [[User:Nguyễn_Trí_Nguyên|TriNguyen12348]] 10:56 January, 30th, 2022 <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 15:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*'''Delete.''' Also last sentence of article makes no sense. [[User:Nwhyte|Nwhyte]] ([[User talk:Nwhyte|talk]]) 22:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:13, 30 January 2022

Kepler-1972 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO. Single source, a preprint and apparently not yet even accepted for publication. Even accepting the source, this is not a notable object and fails on the WP:NASTCRIT criteria. At best, it is too soon. Lithopsian (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]