Talk:Kuwait Armed Forces: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:01, 1 March 2022

Western Asia: Kuwait Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kuwait (assessed as High-importance).

Military history: National / Middle East C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Many problems with this article

This article has a great many failings. Essentially, it seems to have been written as an official history designed to present its subject from a uniformly favourable point of view (POV), sourced almost entirely by its subjects Web site. When some of these problems were corrected, the unsuitable information was reinstated without explanation; no edit summary, no Talk.

Some, not all issues: WP:PEACOCK, praise rather than information (unsupported by independent sources). MOS:HONORIFIC: titles which are purely honorific rather than informative should not be used. Pol098 (talk) 10:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Later edits are making this article worse, rather than improving it. It reads even more like an official history. There is much talk abouyt the dastardly Ikhwan; where is their opinion? Read guidelines carefully, including MOS:HONORIFIC, WP:PRIMARY, WP:REPEATLINK. And repeated references to the same source should be consolidated into a single reference cited repeatedly. Pol098 (talk) 21:13, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added some information from independent sources, including such basics as total strength. Pol098 (talk) 11:54, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kuwait Military Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Kuwait Military Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kuwait Military Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

fit for military service is impossibly high!

according to the citation for "fit for military service" the data is clearly ten times what the citation listed. please review and edit. 184.160.96.212 (talk) 03:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 17:35, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
+== fit for military service is impossibly high! ==
+according to the citation for "fit for military service" the data is clearly ten times what the citation listed. please review and edit. [[Special:Contributions/184.160.96.212|184.160.96.212]] ([[User talk:184.160.96.212|talk]]) 03:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)