User talk:173.162.211.85: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→October 2021: Oops! |
→October 2021: Reply |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> [[User:ClueBot NG|ClueBot NG]] ([[User talk:ClueBot NG|talk]]) 05:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC) |
Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> [[User:ClueBot NG|ClueBot NG]] ([[User talk:ClueBot NG|talk]]) 05:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC) |
||
:Yeah, OK, it’s a hill not worth fighting for, and probably more appropriate to the talk page, if someone cares to copy&paste it there, for the sake of easy access to my critique of (a/various) colleague’s’ not-trashworthy-but-clumsy organization or wording. No-harm-no-foul, hopefully on either side. My current situ’n impedes my contrib’ng efficiently. ‘’Best wishes to all/Good luck to all of you, boys’’, and blame me rather than any fellow users of this node.<br>—[[Special:Contributions/173.162.211.85|173.162.211.85]] ([[User talk:173.162.211.85#top|talk]]) 07:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)<br> |
:Yeah, OK, it’s a hill not worth fighting for, and probably more appropriate to the talk page, if someone cares to copy&paste it there, for the sake of easy access to my critique of (a/various) colleague’s’ not-trashworthy-but-clumsy organization or wording. No-harm-no-foul, hopefully on either side. My current situ’n impedes my contrib’ng efficiently. ‘’Best wishes to all/Good luck to all of you, boys’’, and blame me rather than any fellow users of this node.<br>—[[Special:Contributions/173.162.211.85|173.162.211.85]] ([[User talk:173.162.211.85#top|talk]]) 07:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)<br> |
||
:::: I feel a little silly advising you as (for reasons too boring to go into) one ip-user to another, but give a thot to declaring a unique username, if only bcz yr edits will generally be accorded more respect. (I was an early adopter — and in fact an early administrator, in due time). ip-userNote that one facet of reg-Ed-ship is that a “handle (radio)” radically improves one’s own, and the project’s effectiveness. (I may have lost enuf of my effectiveness, that my own re-registration as editor, let alone admin is not worth the effort, so [[do-as-I-say]]. (And “Remember Woody!”)<br>—15:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)<br> [[Special:Contributions/173.162.211.85|173.162.211.85]] ([[User talk:173.162.211.85#top|talk]]) 15:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:56, 10 March 2022
October 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to What Women Want have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: What Women Want was changed by 173.162.211.85 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866292 on 2021-10-24T05:31:23+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, OK, it’s a hill not worth fighting for, and probably more appropriate to the talk page, if someone cares to copy&paste it there, for the sake of easy access to my critique of (a/various) colleague’s’ not-trashworthy-but-clumsy organization or wording. No-harm-no-foul, hopefully on either side. My current situ’n impedes my contrib’ng efficiently. ‘’Best wishes to all/Good luck to all of you, boys’’, and blame me rather than any fellow users of this node.
—173.162.211.85 (talk) 07:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- I feel a little silly advising you as (for reasons too boring to go into) one ip-user to another, but give a thot to declaring a unique username, if only bcz yr edits will generally be accorded more respect. (I was an early adopter — and in fact an early administrator, in due time). ip-userNote that one facet of reg-Ed-ship is that a “handle (radio)” radically improves one’s own, and the project’s effectiveness. (I may have lost enuf of my effectiveness, that my own re-registration as editor, let alone admin is not worth the effort, so do-as-I-say. (And “Remember Woody!”)
—15:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
173.162.211.85 (talk) 15:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- I feel a little silly advising you as (for reasons too boring to go into) one ip-user to another, but give a thot to declaring a unique username, if only bcz yr edits will generally be accorded more respect. (I was an early adopter — and in fact an early administrator, in due time). ip-userNote that one facet of reg-Ed-ship is that a “handle (radio)” radically improves one’s own, and the project’s effectiveness. (I may have lost enuf of my effectiveness, that my own re-registration as editor, let alone admin is not worth the effort, so do-as-I-say. (And “Remember Woody!”)