Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sukmit Gurung (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)
Inspect61 (talk | contribs)
keep
Line 21: Line 21:
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' Source analysis required<br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 18:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Sukmit Gurung (2nd nomination)]]</noinclude></p>
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' Source analysis required<br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 18:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Sukmit Gurung (2nd nomination)]]</noinclude></p>
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' source analysis didn't happen, but should for consensus. 3rd time's a charm?<br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Calibri; font-weight:bold;">[[User:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#a117f2;">Star</span>]] [[User talk:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#df00fe;">Mississippi</span>]]</span> 02:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Sukmit Gurung (2nd nomination)]][[Category:AfD debates relisted 3 or more times|3 Sukmit Gurung (2nd nomination)]]</noinclude></p>
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' source analysis didn't happen, but should for consensus. 3rd time's a charm?<br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Calibri; font-weight:bold;">[[User:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#a117f2;">Star</span>]] [[User talk:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#df00fe;">Mississippi</span>]]</span> 02:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Sukmit Gurung (2nd nomination)]][[Category:AfD debates relisted 3 or more times|3 Sukmit Gurung (2nd nomination)]]</noinclude></p>
*'''KEEP''' A notable Nepali singer Passes [[WP:NSINGER]]

Revision as of 03:37, 17 March 2022

Sukmit Gurung

Sukmit Gurung (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No famous songs that have any news. This is a local singer with no reputation. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 02:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

coverage should not just be in depth. But it should also be reliable. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 22:57, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Laptopinmyhands:-Yes off-course! [1] is the most reputable publication, a sister org of Kantipur Publications, hence reliable. In case you cant understand, use google translate. Other sources are often reliable, but not always. Why I use those sources? Because in this particular case, they are reliable. How I know they are reliable? Because I am from Nepal and have a good gauge when they are NOT reliable. nirmal (talk) 13:27, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Source analysis required
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 18:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: source analysis didn't happen, but should for consensus. 3rd time's a charm?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]