Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GeraldFord1980: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Adding sockpuppet incident. |
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===={{big|Comments by other users}}==== |
===={{big|Comments by other users}}==== |
||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
How can [[User:GF1980|GF1980]] be a sock of [[User:GF1980|GF1980]]? Can a sock be a sock of itself? This is exactly what Jgstokes is asserting in his comments. Stokes' claim makes no sense at all.[[User:GF1980|GF1980]] ([[User talk:GF1980|talk]]) 18:28, 23 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
===={{big|Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments}}==== |
===={{big|Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments}}==== |
||
Revision as of 18:28, 23 March 2022
GeraldFord1980
- GeraldFord1980 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GeraldFord1980/Archive.
A clerk or checkuser recommends that new socks in this case not receive tags per WP:DENY.
This case's socks should have their talk page and email access revoked due to abuse.
23 March 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- GF1980 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools
Appears to be the latest GF1980 sock, based on this (lds-centric nonsensical edit, copy/pasting unrelated reference to make it look legitimite). CU request for any sleepers. Oversight intervention requested to strike personal information from edit history. --Jgstokes (talk) 18:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
How can GF1980 be a sock of GF1980? Can a sock be a sock of itself? This is exactly what Jgstokes is asserting in his comments. Stokes' claim makes no sense at all.GF1980 (talk) 18:28, 23 March 2022 (UTC)