Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of photovoltaics companies (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 15: Line 15:
::It has a tag saying its factual accuracy is disputed so how do you know it is valid? Re being dated the deletion policy says that deletion "is appropriate for articles which cannot be improved". [[User:Chidgk1|Chidgk1]] ([[User talk:Chidgk1|talk]]) 11:09, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
::It has a tag saying its factual accuracy is disputed so how do you know it is valid? Re being dated the deletion policy says that deletion "is appropriate for articles which cannot be improved". [[User:Chidgk1|Chidgk1]] ([[User talk:Chidgk1|talk]]) 11:09, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
:::It says "This article's factual accuracy is disputed. (June 2016)". So the tag is outdated. I see references throughout the article. The information is listed by year, so people know when it was last updated. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 11:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
:::It says "This article's factual accuracy is disputed. (June 2016)". So the tag is outdated. I see references throughout the article. The information is listed by year, so people know when it was last updated. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 11:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
::Keep it, but it would be nice if it was updated. [[Special:Contributions/2603:7081:7C03:21AA:D860:4F31:C37E:1B4B|2603:7081:7C03:21AA:D860:4F31:C37E:1B4B]] ([[User talk:2603:7081:7C03:21AA:D860:4F31:C37E:1B4B|talk]]) 10:05, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:05, 7 May 2022

List of photovoltaics companies

List of photovoltaics companies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Impossible to keep up to date Chidgk1 (talk) 14:48, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep The article features a lot of random statistics and everything. The article would be easier to manage if it were a simple list. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 16:18, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You think someone might change it to a simple list? Chidgk1 (talk) 11:09, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Valid navigational and information list. Not being able to keep something up to date is not a valid reason to delete it. Dream Focus 21:17, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It has a tag saying its factual accuracy is disputed so how do you know it is valid? Re being dated the deletion policy says that deletion "is appropriate for articles which cannot be improved". Chidgk1 (talk) 11:09, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It says "This article's factual accuracy is disputed. (June 2016)". So the tag is outdated. I see references throughout the article. The information is listed by year, so people know when it was last updated. Dream Focus 11:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it, but it would be nice if it was updated. 2603:7081:7C03:21AA:D860:4F31:C37E:1B4B (talk) 10:05, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]