Talk:National Maternity Hospital, Dublin: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:37, 13 May 2022

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Ireland Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

petition numbers

I've reverted a few edits from Bann Smaori which has changed text "a petition to opposed to them being the sole owners has been signed by more than 100,000 people"' to "a petition to opposed to them being the sole owners has been signed by less than 50,000 people.". It's outright false, and bordering on vandalism to change "over 100,000" to "under 50,000". The source is quite clear that the number to "over 100,000". Edits in question: first example, second example ____Ebelular (talk) 11:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Respected obstetricians?

There is some controversy in Ireland at the moment, with various obstetricians espousing differing views on the upcoming abortion referendum. The living person referred to in the article has often been reported in the media as tending towards the single-patient style of obstetrics in cases where some other obstetricians might take the two-patient view. So, the question is - should we differentiate between the two-patient and single-patient obstetricians in Ireland at the moment? I think some would say that the living person referred to was a respected single-patient obstetrician, while others would say he is respected without qualification.

So... could we add clarity without bias? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.156.185 (talk) 19:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appointment of board members

The article says : In 2022, ownership of the order's shares in SVHG was transferred to a newly formed company, St Vincent's Holdings, whose directors were appointed by the order. I don't see any source for this statement. This is also likely a false claim since it was reported in good sources that the order left management in 2017 and no longer have any role.Aerchasúr (talk) 00:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 So... could we add clarity without bias?  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.40.156.185|86.40.156.185]] ([[User talk:86.40.156.185#top|talk]]) 19:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+==Appointment of board members==
+The article says : In 2022, ownership of the order's shares in SVHG was transferred to a newly formed company, St Vincent's Holdings, '''whose directors were appointed by the order.''' I don't see any source for this statement. This is also likely a false claim since it was reported in good sources that the order left management in 2017 and no longer have any role.[[User:Aerchasúr|Aerchasúr]] ([[User talk:Aerchasúr|talk]]) 00:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)