Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snazzy the Optimist: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:12, 29 May 2022

Snazzy the Optimist

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The entity fails the general notability guideline. The sources used for the entity are directorys such as MusicBrainz and FilmFreeway. Nigerian Tribune would help to establish notability BUT just it can't. The Billboard article says nothing about Snazzy the Optimist, as it wasn't even talking about it in the first place. Lambo Xtra and the Pulse Nigeria article are both paid posts. Others are content farms. Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 14:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Nigeria, and South Africa. Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 14:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with nom, most sources aren't just what's used to establish notability. Oaktree b (talk) 16:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Plausibly Notable and MusicBrainz used for the entry is only showcasing and supporting the words "Musical artist" as it is in the article, beside MusicBrainz is the 5th source. The references of this article it's clearly talking about the subject and it's clearly plausibly notable, according to the nominator stating some of the sources are paid posts, is not true. No disrespect but i would highly recommend the nominator to systematically review it again, thank you so much. Gelchi (talk) 16:59, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 16:59, 29 May 2022 edit Gelchi (talk \| contribs) 50 edits →‎Snazzy the Optimist: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:12, 29 May 2022 edit undo Gelchi (talk \| contribs) 50 edits →‎Snazzy the Optimist Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*'''Delete''' agree with nom, most sources aren't just what's used to establish notability. [[User:Oaktree b\|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b\|talk]]) 16:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)		*'''Delete''' agree with nom, most sources aren't just what's used to establish notability. [[User:Oaktree b\|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b\|talk]]) 16:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

	:'''Keep''' Plausibly Notable and [[MusicBrainz]] used for the entry is only showcasing and supporting the words "Musical artist" as it is in the article, beside [[MusicBrainz]] is the 5th source. The references of this article it's clearly talking about the subject and it's clearly plausibly notable, according to the nominator stating some of the sources are paid posts, is not true. No disrespect but i would highly recommend the nominator to systematically review it again, thank you so much. [[User:Gelchi\|Gelchi]] ([[User talk:Gelchi\|talk]]) 16:59, 29 May 2022 (UTC)		*'''Keep''' Plausibly Notable and [[MusicBrainz]] used for the entry is only showcasing and supporting the words "Musical artist" as it is in the article, beside [[MusicBrainz]] is the 5th source. The references of this article it's clearly talking about the subject and it's clearly plausibly notable, according to the nominator stating some of the sources are paid posts, is not true. No disrespect but i would highly recommend the nominator to systematically review it again, thank you so much. [[User:Gelchi\|Gelchi]] ([[User talk:Gelchi\|talk]]) 16:59, 29 May 2022 (UTC)