User talk:Dan Wescher

ANY SPAM- OR HARASSMENT-RELATED SECTIONS WILL BE REMOVED AND KEPT OUT OF THE ARCHIVE(S).

Archive 1

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Squid Game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page O Yeong-su.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice

This notice is mandatory per the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Header.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Dan Wescher. Thank you. — Bilorv (talk) 08:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 11:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

• With permission from Ferret (talk · contribs), I have amended this block so you will only be prevented from editing the article namespace. You will be able to use talk pages and participate in the above-linked discussion of your behaviour. Stifle (talk) 13:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Request for block removal

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Dan Wescher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

1) I had never heard of "The Iron Warrior" prior to being blocked for supposedly being a "sockpuppet" of him. How can this account be a puppet of a user I didn't even know existed? 2) I will admit that I let my temper get the best of me and may have treated some users unfairly, but I can assure you that starting edit wars was not my intention. If I do get unblocked, I promise that I won't fight users and make more constructive contributions. 3) I promise to change my behavior by listening to other users and not breaking the privacy rules. 4) I also request that the autoblock be removed as I feel it's excessive, and I don't plan on making anymore accounts.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=1) I had '''''never''''' heard of "The Iron Warrior" prior to being blocked for supposedly being a "sockpuppet" of him. How can this account be a puppet of a user I didn't even know existed? 2) I will admit that I let my temper get the best of me and may have treated some users unfairly, but I can assure you that starting edit wars was not my intention. If I do get unblocked, I promise that I won't fight users and make more constructive contributions. 3) I promise to change my behavior by listening to other users and not breaking the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Privacy of names|privacy rules]]. 4) I also request that the autoblock be removed as I feel it's excessive, and I don't plan on making anymore accounts. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=1) I had '''''never''''' heard of "The Iron Warrior" prior to being blocked for supposedly being a "sockpuppet" of him. How can this account be a puppet of a user I didn't even know existed? 2) I will admit that I let my temper get the best of me and may have treated some users unfairly, but I can assure you that starting edit wars was not my intention. If I do get unblocked, I promise that I won't fight users and make more constructive contributions. 3) I promise to change my behavior by listening to other users and not breaking the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Privacy of names|privacy rules]]. 4) I also request that the autoblock be removed as I feel it's excessive, and I don't plan on making anymore accounts. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=1) I had '''''never''''' heard of "The Iron Warrior" prior to being blocked for supposedly being a "sockpuppet" of him. How can this account be a puppet of a user I didn't even know existed? 2) I will admit that I let my temper get the best of me and may have treated some users unfairly, but I can assure you that starting edit wars was not my intention. If I do get unblocked, I promise that I won't fight users and make more constructive contributions. 3) I promise to change my behavior by listening to other users and not breaking the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Privacy of names|privacy rules]]. 4) I also request that the autoblock be removed as I feel it's excessive, and I don't plan on making anymore accounts. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

For unblock patrollers: I blocked this user on a combination of behavioral and checkuser technical information. I believe I've made the correct determination, and as such, the user would be under 3X community ban. Please contact me for details, including a bit of private evidence. -- ferret (talk) 22:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

As far as I'm concerned, the indefinite block is warranted even if―purely for the sake of argument―we drop all talk about sockpuppetry. I'm thoroughly unconvinced by: I will admit that I let my temper get the best of me and may have treated some users unfairly, but I can assure you that starting edit wars was not my intention. This isn't an admission that they started an edit war, nor acknowledgement of the majority of the issues I raised in the ANI thread, and moreover there is no convincing description of how they will change their behaviour. — Bilorv (talk) 22:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

I updated it to acknowledge how I will change my behavior. Anyway, I really do promise to change my ways. —ÐW-🇺🇦^(T·C) 22:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Can you say specifically what you did wrong? For instance, what "biography rules" did you break and in what way? Your comments are very vague. — Bilorv (talk) 22:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

The rules stated at "Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Privacy of names". —ÐW-🇺🇦^(T·C) 22:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)