Talk:Linux Documentation Project: Difference between revisions
→How-To redirect: new section |
Aethalides (talk | contribs) →Completely gone: Reply |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
The domain tldp.org has gone completely offline now. The tldp.net one still exists but is a very old outdated one containing only a handful of pages. Interestingly though it has also disappeared from the mirrors. [[User:Aethalides|Aethalides]] ([[User talk:Aethalides|talk]]) 10:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC) |
The domain tldp.org has gone completely offline now. The tldp.net one still exists but is a very old outdated one containing only a handful of pages. Interestingly though it has also disappeared from the mirrors. [[User:Aethalides|Aethalides]] ([[User talk:Aethalides|talk]]) 10:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC) |
||
:Replying to my own note, tldp.org has long since come back online |
|||
:[[User:Aethalides|Aethalides]] ([[User talk:Aethalides|talk]]) 16:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== How-To redirect == |
== How-To redirect == |
||
Revision as of 16:30, 16 July 2022
 | Linux Start‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 September 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
wiki
Glad to see this. As of September 2088, LDP is still alive a doing well, even building a wiki
Jdd (talk) 20:45, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Wikifying the Linux Documentation Project
I've seen some wikis for Linux. It got me wondering if anyone had considered turning the Linux Documenation Project into one big wiki ... use the HOWTOs as the foundation and let the masses do their additions and corrections. Any thoughts?
Yes. I have a thought: that's exactly why I looked up Linux and the LDP here. Perhaps the issue is quality? That said, it would seem to be an ideal wiki application particularly if 'static' versions checked for factual errors were also available. If the LDP don't want to host a wiki, a wikibook in Wikipedia might be a very useful thing. Wikipedia could port LDP documents into wiki format if they were able to get the permission of their principal authors (see here). This is their boilerplate licence (although variations will exist):
Copyright (c) 2000 by John Doe (change to your name)
Please freely copy and distribute (sell or give away) this document in any format. It's requested that corrections and/or comments be fowarded to the document maintainer. You may create a derivative work and distribute it provided that you:
1. Send your derivative work (in the most suitable format such as sgml) to the LDP (Linux Documentation Project) or the like for posting on the Internet. If not the LDP, then let the LDP know where it is available.
2. License the derivative work with this same license or use GPL. Include a copyright notice and at least a pointer to the license used.
3. Give due credit to previous authors and major contributors.
If you're considering making a derived work other than a translation, it's requested that you discuss your plans with the current maintainer.
State of wiki-discussions at TLDP
Wififying documents have been discussed for a while. One editable and commentable demo is now (2005) available [1]. Also the Wikipedia was reviwed as an example for use at TLDP [2]. The conclusion was negative.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Linux Documentation Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130204081408/http://www.linux.com/ldp-index to https://www.linux.com/ldp-index
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Is the project still active anywhere?
It appears like TLDP has gone silent.
Should this wiki page should be updated to reflect that?
It's April 2018, but the most recent update on the site appears to be Jan 2015.
The TLDP wiki page is only slightly better with the most recent changes being Jan 2016, but they were almost all SPAM fixes.
Trying to figure out what is going on, I searched around, and found that there were concerns about TLDP having grown stale years before all activity on the project seemed to halt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmkit (talk • contribs) 20:23, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Completely gone
The domain tldp.org has gone completely offline now. The tldp.net one still exists but is a very old outdated one containing only a handful of pages. Interestingly though it has also disappeared from the mirrors. Aethalides (talk) 10:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Replying to my own note, tldp.org has long since come back online
- Aethalides (talk) 16:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
How-To redirect
The How-To redirect should reasonably point to Owner's manual or to a more appropriate page (maybe a new one needs to be created?) instead of this very specific Linux project.
An example is The Complete Manual of Suicide, in which the "How-To" genre redirects to the "Content" section of this page. MatMasIt (talk) 14:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)