User talk:Adamtt9

Proposed deletion of Indrit Cullhaj

The article Indrit Cullhaj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOLYMPICS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Indrit Cullhaj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indrit Cullhaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indrit Cullhaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sangay Tenzin

The article Sangay Tenzin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOLYMPICS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Sangay Tenzin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sangay Tenzin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangay Tenzin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Ross Stone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ross Stone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ross Stone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Timothy Rezelman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy Rezelman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Rezelman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Adamtt9,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 803 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 856 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Advice

Since you are a major creator of articles in the tennis project, i strongly suggest you to familiarize with External Links and References and the differences between the two in order to convey the same grade of standard actual and previous editors in this wiki project have used so far. In particular avoid to gather all links, inline citations and not, under the same header at the bottom of the article, and if you use some standard model to create these articles, make sure to extend the needed corrections also there in order not to propagate it further. Thanks. --Opencross (talk) 21:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gabriel Debru

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gabriel Debru requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Coco (talk) 14:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Adamtt9,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 13732 articles, as of 10:00, 15 July 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

2023-24 ucl

Is not to soon! Only 10 months! 2A01:117F:432:CC00:B8FA:BD47:731B:70AF (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Simanga Dlamini

The article Simanga Dlamini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; lack of significant coverage from third-party sources. This is the closest thing to SIGCOV I could find.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 23:34, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Please check my edit

Hi Adam, I've just updated the page Francisco Comesaña, as you might remember I'm active in it.wiki and I dont have much experience about en.wiki standards, please check if my edit is ok, thank you. Carlo58s (talk) 03:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

@Carlo58s: It's great. I just made a few changes to keep consistency but other than that it's good. Adamtt9 (talk) 03:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

New page creation

Hello Adamtt9,

I need to create a new page for a professional tennis player. I can write down my research, but can you please code it and publish it? I am new here, and not really sure how to create a good page. You have created similar pages, so I think you will be a big help to me. Please let me know what you think. Thanks! Pascolor (talk) 14:47, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

• @Pascolor: please review the guidelines laid out at WP:NTENNIS. Any player that doesn't meet one of these guidelines is unlikely to meet notability criteria and is likely to be deleted on Wikipedia if an article is created. Adamtt9 (talk) 15:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Hey Adamtt9, so I read the guidelines and I think he meets the criteria. Please let me know what I should send you. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pascolor (talk • contribs) 17:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

• @Pascolor: If you could send over the player's name and any sources that go into detail over the player's career or results, I can take a look Adamtt9 (talk) 19:39, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

I have prepared this in a Word file. Please use this and change it accordingly. Let me know what you think. Thanks!

Country: USA Born: August 1, 2001 in Oyster Bay, New York Height: 5ft 10 inches Plays: Right Handed (two-handed backhand) Coach: Todd Widom College: Louisiana State University (LSU) - https://lsusports.net/sports/mt/roster/season/2021-22/player/ronald-hohmann/ Prize Money: $4,560 Highest Singles Ranking: 1370 on November 25, 2019 Highest Doubles Ranking: 1650 on January 6, 2020 - https://www.atptour.com/en/players/ronald-hohmann/h0cu/overview

Ronald Hohmann is an American tennis player. He was born on August 1, 2001, in Oyster Bay, New York. He has a career high ATP singles ranking of 1370 achieved on November 25, 2019. - https://www.tigerrag.com/world-of-talent-after-being-tested-atop-lsus-lineup-against-some-of-the-nations-best-ronald-hohmann-is-primed-to-put-it-all-together/

Career

In 2017, Hohmann won the boys 16s Eddie Herr International Championships. https://newyorktennismagazine.com/new-yorker-ronnie-hohmann-takes-his-game-next-level-florida

In 2019, Hohmann played Main Draw of US Open Juniors and an ATP 80 Challenger. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_US_Open_–_Boys%27_singles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Kentucky_Bank_Tennis_Championships_–_Men%27s_singles

In the same year, he won the Easter Bowl 18s along with Emma Navarro, an ITF Level B 1 and a USTA Level event as a qualifier, by winning all 9 matches he played in, making him the first player in 52 years to do so. - https://www.usta.com/en/home/stay-current/national/qualifier-ron-hohmann--emma-navarro-capture-18s-titles-at-adidas.html https://www.desertsun.com/story/sports/tennis/2019/03/31/qualifier-makes-easter-bowl-history-wins-usta-national-championship/3328251002/

He has a career record of 35-28 in ITF World Tour and Challenger events. - https://www.itftennis.com/en/players/ronald-hohmann/800476450/usa/mt/s/overview/

ITF World Tour – Singles - https://www.itftennis.com/en/players/ronald-hohmann/800476450/usa/mt/s/itf-points-breakdown/#pprofile-info-tabs

Tournament Category Points M15 East Lansing, MI 2021 M15 1

M25 Houston 2019           M25       3

ITF World Tour – Doubles

Tournament Category Points M15 Tallahassee, FL 2019 M15 2

Awards & achievements

2019 USTA Gold Ball - https://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/fl-cn-sp-coral-springs-widom-tennis-20190508-story.html

2021 All SEC Second Team - https://lsusports.net/news/2021/04/30/mens-tennis-ronald-hohmann-named-to-second-team-all-sec/

2022 All SEC Second Team - https://lsusports.net/news/2022/04/29/hohmann-hunter-tabbed-second-team-all-sec/

2022 ITA All American - https://lsusports.net/news/2022/05/25/hohmann-falls-in-round-of-16-and-returns-an-ita-all-american/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pascolor (talk • contribs) 21:52, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

@Pascolor: There was a draft for this player just recently that was denied and then deleted. He doesn't meet the criteria outlined at WP:NTENNIS as he has not participated in any ATP tour-level events nor has he had any success at the Challenger level. The sources you have sent me are almost all exclusively from LSU and don't show any indication that this player is notable beyond his time at LSU. Maybe if any success is achieved in the future, an article will be created, but for now, I am afraid not. Adamtt9 (talk) 21:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

I see. Can you please still publish it? It's totally fine if it gets deleted. Pascolor (talk) 13:59, 4 August 2022 (UTC)