Talk:Noric steel: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Added content and correction. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
According to Dr. Brigitte Cech, Austrian archaeologist, Romans never excavated iron ore from Erzberg mountain, Styria. This source of |
According to Dr. Brigitte Cech, Austrian archaeologist, Romans never excavated iron ore from Erzberg mountain, Styria. This source of |
||
raw material became important only from Middle Ages onwards. (Gottfried Wernig, A-9341 Strassburg) |
raw material became important only from Middle Ages onwards. (Gottfried Wernig, A-9341 Strassburg) |
||
Gottfried is right. |
|||
Erzberg ore is not Noricum. |
|||
It is purer in iron, also less concentrated. |
|||
The point about Noricum ore from Knappenberg/Huettenberg, and other small mines in the area, is that it has natural work-hardening alloying elements in it. It is also more highly concentrated in iron % than Erzberg ore. |
|||
A visit to the museum at Knappenberg is well worthwhile (I was there yesterday!) Frankly it is better informed about local iron-making than the Technische Museum Wien. |
|||
It's possible that other mines around Friesach have similar properties. Friesach is considerably easier to access, as a trading and administration centre. |
|||
Incidentally, I asked if Turrach iron claimed to be Noricum (I was there last week). The answer is no. Turrach can claim the first Bessemer converter in Austria. |
|||
This article needs some references. My sources, apart from the museums, include 'Eisenbahnen am Kärntner Erzberg: Bilder von den Förderbahnen, Bergbauen, und Bergleuten am Hüttenberger Erzberg (Archiv für vaterländische Geschichte und Topographie) (German Edition) |
|||
Hohn, Manfred' |
|||
(Andrew Starr A9020 Klagenfurt) |
|||
<!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/91.119.16.124|91.119.16.124]] ([[User talk:91.119.16.124#top|talk]]) 06:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 14:32, 18 August 2022
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Classical Greece and Rome Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Metalworking Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
According to Dr. Brigitte Cech, Austrian archaeologist, Romans never excavated iron ore from Erzberg mountain, Styria. This source of raw material became important only from Middle Ages onwards. (Gottfried Wernig, A-9341 Strassburg)
Gottfried is right. Erzberg ore is not Noricum. It is purer in iron, also less concentrated. The point about Noricum ore from Knappenberg/Huettenberg, and other small mines in the area, is that it has natural work-hardening alloying elements in it. It is also more highly concentrated in iron % than Erzberg ore. A visit to the museum at Knappenberg is well worthwhile (I was there yesterday!) Frankly it is better informed about local iron-making than the Technische Museum Wien. It's possible that other mines around Friesach have similar properties. Friesach is considerably easier to access, as a trading and administration centre. Incidentally, I asked if Turrach iron claimed to be Noricum (I was there last week). The answer is no. Turrach can claim the first Bessemer converter in Austria.
This article needs some references. My sources, apart from the museums, include 'Eisenbahnen am Kärntner Erzberg: Bilder von den Förderbahnen, Bergbauen, und Bergleuten am Hüttenberger Erzberg (Archiv für vaterländische Geschichte und Topographie) (German Edition) Hohn, Manfred' (Andrew Starr A9020 Klagenfurt)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.119.16.124 (talk) 06:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)