Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maropost (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
संजीव कुमार (talk | contribs) →Maropost: +delete |
Assirian cat (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|list of Internet-related deletion discussions]]. — <span style="background: linear-gradient(#990000,#660000)">[[User:Red-tailed hawk|<span style="color: white">Red-tailed hawk</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Red-tailed hawk|<span style="color: white">(nest)</span>]]</sub></span> 14:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|list of Internet-related deletion discussions]]. — <span style="background: linear-gradient(#990000,#660000)">[[User:Red-tailed hawk|<span style="color: white">Red-tailed hawk</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Red-tailed hawk|<span style="color: white">(nest)</span>]]</sub></span> 14:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete'''' I didn't find any reliable source which makes it notable.<span style='color:green;'>☆★</span>[[User:संजीव कुमार|<u><span style='color:Magenta;'>Sanjeev Kumar</span></u>]] ([[User talk:संजीव कुमार|<span style='color:blue;font-size:8pt;'>talk</span>]]) 08:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''' I didn't find any reliable source which makes it notable.<span style='color:green;'>☆★</span>[[User:संजीव कुमार|<u><span style='color:Magenta;'>Sanjeev Kumar</span></u>]] ([[User talk:संजीव कुमार|<span style='color:blue;font-size:8pt;'>talk</span>]]) 08:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per WP:GNG at least. I've added several reliable sources (launch of da vinci platform -MartechSeries and a Bloomberg article) and a line about Maropost Ventures (sources are with passing mentions but it's enough to mention a venture arm of the company). [[User:Assirian cat|Assirian cat]] ([[User talk:Assirian cat|talk]]) 10:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:08, 25 September 2022
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Maropost (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. The sources in the article are insufficient, as shown below:
WP:NCORP assessment table | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am likewise unable to find multiple sources that describe this company in-depth from independent reliable secondary sources. As such, I believe that this article should be deleted for failure to meet the relevant notable criteria at WP:NCORP in line with WP:DEL-REASON#8. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:54, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Advertising, India, and Canada. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:54, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The page has the minimum level of notable sources to pass GNG and remain in Wikipedia --Dark Juliorik (talk) 12:14, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: Notable company and appears to be sufficiently covered to meet WP:GNG. --Bigneeerman (talk) 13:51, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment as nom. This is a for-profit corporation. Per WP:NCORP,
the guideline establishes generally higher requirements for sources that are used to establish notability than for sources that are allowed as acceptable references within an article.
As such, for-profit companies are not evaluated by GNG, but instead by the higher sourcing standards for notability. I'd ask those who claim that this passes a particular notability standard to explicitly state the sources they believe get the company over the hump so that others can evaluate their reasoning; I've already analyzed the sources in the article above and I don't really see any specific pushback against that analysis either based on contesting it directly or finding sources not mentioned in it that contribute towards the company's notability. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC) - Weak Keep -- The article needs some work and more sources, but the company is clearly notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 不和の林檎 (talk • contribs) 07:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Can you provide sources that you believe show that this meets WP:NCORP? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete' I didn't find any reliable source which makes it notable.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 08:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GNG at least. I've added several reliable sources (launch of da vinci platform -MartechSeries and a Bloomberg article) and a line about Maropost Ventures (sources are with passing mentions but it's enough to mention a venture arm of the company). Assirian cat (talk) 10:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC)