Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Jihad International: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:31, 1 March 2007

tagged as possibly lacking notability for just under a month, nothing available in terms of independant verification or attention from reputable sources. seems like a web-based organisation, in which case fails WP:WEB (or WP:ORG if it is otherwise). in any case, nothing to suggest the organisation is even remotely notable. hence, Delete. ITAQALLAH 02:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions. ITAQALLAH 02:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per lack of notability and lack of soruces.--Sefringle 02:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. So far, the most notable thing about the site is simply the number of places the link has been placed. Shenme 03:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lack of notability. bibliomaniac 1 5 04:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. Realkyhick 06:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:N. Terence Ong 恭喜发财 08:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable and very few content. Peace. --Nielswik_(talk) 16:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *'''Delete,''' not notable. [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] 06:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''', [[WP:N]]. [[User:Terence Ong|Terence]][[User talk:Terence Ong| Ong]] [[Chinese New Year|恭喜发财]] 08:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' not notable and very few content. ''Peace''. --'''[[User:Nielswik|Nielswik]]'''<sub>[[User Talk:Nielswik|(talk)]]</sub> 16:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)