User talk:Thisaccountis42: Difference between revisions
Tag: |
m fix |
||
| Line 196: | Line 196: | ||
Enjoy the reading! |
Enjoy the reading! |
||
-- [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 10:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
<small>[[:m:Global message delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia|Subscribe to the newsletter]]</small> |
<small>[[:m:Global message delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia|Subscribe to the newsletter]]</small> |
||
Revision as of 10:19, 3 December 2022
test
Milton Rubincam moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Milton Rubincam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kj cheetham (talk) 22:37, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Milton Rubincam has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Gusfriend (talk) 05:25, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Universalisation (cultural studies)
Thank you for creating Universalisation (cultural studies). In order for the article to be passed as reviewed, please consider returning to it and addressing the tagged issues. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Universalisation (cultural studies) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universalisation (cultural studies) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
A loose necktie (talk) 02:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Universalization (social work)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Universalization (social work) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://whoatwherewhy.com/what-is-meant-by-universalization/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. A loose necktie (talk) 02:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- I made this article from Universalization, which I just nominated for speedy deletion as well. Thisaccountis42 (talk) 03:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Universalisation (cultural studies)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Universalisation (cultural studies) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.artsnova.com/blog/2018/06/25/1239/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. A loose necktie (talk) 02:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Universalization
I have undone your edits to Universalization as follows:
- Removed the db-copyvio template because the copyvio text has been removed.
- Removed the AFD template because it is malformed, no AFD discussion.
If you want to nominate it for AFD, please try again. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:20, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
New Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions updates are out
There are new updates for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions! Please, come and read them!
On July 12, an update regarding the latest team and development news has been published.
On July 15, an essay regarding the potential of Abstract Wikipedia, written by Denny, has been published.
Subscribe · Translate this message
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:40, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
New Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions updates are out
There are new updates for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions! Please, come and read them!
On July 20, an update regarding the latest additions to the team has been published.
On July 29, an essay regarding long typed lists and how to deal with them, written by Denny, has been published.
On August 5, an essay regarding a proposed launch plan for Wikifunctions, written by Denny, has been published.
Enjoy the reading!
Subscribe · Translate this message
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
New Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions updates are out
There are new updates for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions! Please, come and read them!
On August 9, an update regarding the launch of Wikifunctions Beta has been published.
On August 19, an update regarding the proposed template language syntax for Wikifunctions and the Wikimania 2022 sessions dedicated to Wikifunctions and Ninai-Udiron has been published.
Enjoy the reading!
Subscribe · Translate this message
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
New Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions updates are out
There are new updates for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions! Please, come and read them!
On September 23, an update regarding the state of Abstract Wikipedia's Natural Language Generation workstream has been published. This entry is also available as a Wikimedia Diff blog post.
On September 27, an update regarding how to create a Wikifunctions guideline for staff contribution has been published. Please, take some time to contribute to the discussion.
Enjoy the reading!
Subscribe · Translate this message
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
New Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions updates are out
There are new updates for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions! Please, come and read them!
On September 30, an update regarding Cory Massaro's arts residency in Istanbul has been published.
On October 5, a comprehensive update about the last two months of Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions technical developments has been published.
Enjoy the reading!
Subscribe · Translate this message
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:59, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
New Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions updates are out
There are new updates for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions! Please, come and read them!
On October 14, we welcomed Stef Dunlap in our team as Quality and Test Engineer.
On October 20, an update regarding a new Wikifunctions demo (also available here) has been published.
On October 27, we shared a summary of what we achieved thanks to the efforts of six Google Fellows, whose fellowship has come to an end.
Enjoy the reading!
Subscribe · Translate this message
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
New Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions updates are out
There are new updates for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions! Please, come and read them!
On November 4, an essay from Denny about the possible evolutions of natural language generation tasks on Wikifunctions was published.
On November 9, an update about a new browser-based tool, Form Checker, was published (instructional video available here).
Also, we have a new channel on IRC, called "wikipedia-abstract-tech", which is also bridged with Telegram. Find out more about (and maybe join) our official channels here.
Enjoy the reading!
Subscribe · Translate this message
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
New Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions updates are out
There are new updates for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions! Please, come and read them!
On November 17, we announced the beginning of the consultation about Wikifunctions' Code of Conduct. You are invited to express your opinions in the talk page.
On November 23, we posted a brief newsletter announcing the interview to former Google Fellow and returning Wikipedian Ori Livneh. You can read his full interview on the Diff blog.
Also, we remind you that we have a new channel on IRC, called "wikipedia-abstract-tech", which is also bridged with Telegram. Find out more about (and maybe join) our official channels here.
Enjoy the reading!
Subscribe · Translate this message
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:11, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
A new Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions update is out
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue: news about Natural Language Generation (NLG) meetings, a new Mastodon account for the project, and the latest development updates.
Also, we remind you that:
- the discussion about Wikifunctions' Code of Conduct is still open, please come and have your say
- if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next Volunteers' Corner will be held on 5 December 2022, 18:30 UTC (link to the meeting)
Enjoy the reading! -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)