User talk:Winhunter

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:Winhunter/Archive-Jul07. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

---

Archives: Inappropriate/Offensive, /Archive-Apr06 (+before April), /Archive-May06, /Archive-Jun06, /Archive-Jul06, /Archive-Aug06, /Archive-Sep06, /Archive-Oct06, /Archive-Nov06, /Archive-Dec06

---

Research about Wikipedia in CityU

Hi,Winhunter. Glad to see your contribution to the article about CityU. Actually I am a research student in the Business School of CityU. And now I am doing a very interesting research concerning people's contribution to Wikipedia in the organization context. From your user page I am so happy to find that you are an administrator of English Wikipedia who may have plenty of experience about Wikipedia and also very interested in the business subject. So if possible could you please share your valuable experience with me and help me to get a further or broader understanding about the Wikipedia issue especially in the organization context.You could contact me via email yuzhong2@student.cityu.edu.hk or the phone of my office 2788-9974.Or you could leave your contact information for me if convenient. Wait for your reply.Thanks. 202.125.223.145 7 February 2007(UTC)

Why did you delete the Conservapedia article?

Why did you delete the Conservapedia article? Should Wikipedia practice censorship? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.205.191.56 (talk) 22:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC).

Please note that the article was deleted according to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservapedia, recreation of the article is generally not allowed. --WinHunter ^(talk) 05:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I have posted a request for a deletion review of Conservapedia. here. I have not participated in this particular process before, so I may not have done everything correctly. It appears that the site has gained some notability since the original RFD back in December. I voted to delete the article back then. Personally, I could go either way at this point. If the article is undeleted, and the usual policies of NPOV and V are upheld, it could be a benefit to the project. Let me know if I have messed anything up. I haven't been keeping track of this since January. Some recent discussion popped up on the Talk:Conservapedia page. Thanks - Justin (Authalic) 19:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 9	26 February 2007	About the Signpost

Three users temporarily desysopped after wheel war	Peppers article stays deleted
Pro golfer sues over libelous statements	Report from the Norwegian (Bokmål) Wikipedia
WikiWorld comic: "Pet skunk"	News and notes: New arbitrators appointed, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 10	5 March 2007	About the Signpost

New Yorker correction dogs arbitrator into departure	WikiWorld comic: "The Rutles"
News and notes: Picture of the Year, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:48, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Whoa, bot!

This edit is kind of pointless, isn't it? *Mishatx*-In\Out 02:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)