User talk:GizzyCatBella: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:GizzyCatBella/Archives/2023/February. (BOT) |
HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs) →AE result: new section |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=User talk:GizzyCatBella/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=90|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=User talk:GizzyCatBella/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=90|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
||
== AE result == |
|||
This is to let you know that I've closed the AE request about TrangaBellam. Of the evidence that related to you, some showed a pattern of lengthening discussions without progressing them towards a conclusion, and of off-topic or derailing comments—in particular, addressing meta or procedural aspects but not the matter at hand. While this does not rise to the level of requiring a formal sanction, I will be logging a warning as a record that this conduct has been discussed. I would politely ask you to restrict your comments to content matters going forward. My hope is that that is the end of the matter, but note that similar conduct comes to admins' attention in the future, it is very likely to result in a formal sanction. As a logged warning, this is appealable in accordance with the [[Wikipedia:Contentious_topics#Appeals_and_amendments|appeal procedure]]. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<b style="color: teal; font-family: Tahoma">HJ Mitchell</b>]] | [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<span style="color: navy; font-family: Times New Roman" title="(Talk page)">Penny for your thoughts?</span>]] 19:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:12, 7 March 2023
| Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days | ||
|---|---|---|
Detailed traffic statistics |
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
AE result
This is to let you know that I've closed the AE request about TrangaBellam. Of the evidence that related to you, some showed a pattern of lengthening discussions without progressing them towards a conclusion, and of off-topic or derailing comments—in particular, addressing meta or procedural aspects but not the matter at hand. While this does not rise to the level of requiring a formal sanction, I will be logging a warning as a record that this conduct has been discussed. I would politely ask you to restrict your comments to content matters going forward. My hope is that that is the end of the matter, but note that similar conduct comes to admins' attention in the future, it is very likely to result in a formal sanction. As a logged warning, this is appealable in accordance with the appeal procedure. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)